Electing Peace: Violence Prevention and Impact at the Polls examines election violence prevention and assesses the effectiveness of different prevention practices—which are effective, which are not, and under what circumstances.

Targeted peacebuilding efforts are frequently used to prevent election violence. Practitioners possess a variety of programming options, including peace messaging campaigns, preventive diplomacy and monitoring missions. But the ability of election violence prevention to achieve its intended outcome merits further investigation. This edited volume focuses on five electoral democracies: Honduras, Bangladesh, Thailand, Malawi and Moldova. During their most recent election cycle, all five countries displayed similar risk levels but experienced differing levels of electoral violence. Through these case studies and comparative analysis, the authors assess the impact of prevention efforts on the levels of violence and derive lessons-learned that can be applied in other electoral contexts. 

Electing Peace is a rigorous and engaging piece of research on an understudied topic. The volume is set to become a seminal work in the emerging field of electoral violence studies.”
—Sarah Birch, Professor of Comparative Politics, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow

Jonas Claes is a senior program officer in the Center for Applied Conflict Transformation at the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP), where he conducts research and analysis on the prevention of electoral violence and mass atrocities. In this capacity, Claes coordinates USIP prevention projects and consults with senior U.S. and UN officials in fine-tuning prevention practices. 

Contributors:

  • Geoffrey Macdonald
  • Duncan McCargo
  • Petra Desatova
  • Manuela Travaglianti
  • Dominik Tolksdorf
  • Elizabeth Murray

Related Publications

Preventing Election Violence: Equal Risk, Different Results

Preventing Election Violence: Equal Risk, Different Results

Friday, November 7, 2014

By: Ian Proctor

Even in the tumultuous history of Bangladesh, the deadly campaign-related violence that plagued this year’s parliamentary elections seemed unprecedented. Hundreds reportedly were killed amidst bitter feuding between the governing Awami League and the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party. And yet the risk factors for such turmoil aren’t that different from difficult but more peaceful places like Malawi. A USIP project is examining those and three other cases to determine how and when electoral violence prevention efforts might be able to help.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

Q&A: What Works in Preventing Election Violence

Q&A: What Works in Preventing Election Violence

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

By: USIP Staff

The elections this year in the Philippines, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Gabon and even the United States, demonstrate how high-stakes elections frequently trigger anxiety, tension or even violence or the threat of unrest. Properly managed elections allow opposing groups to press their claim to power through a peaceful process. But in fragile democracies, elections frequently feature intimidation or violent protest. U.S. Institute of Peace Senior Program Officer Jonas Claes, editor o...

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Electoral Violence; Democracy & Governance; Fragility and Resilience

View All Publications