Amid intensifying strategic competition, mutual suspicions, and more frequent close encounters between U.S. and Chinese crafts in the air and at sea, there is a growing danger that an inadvertent crisis between the two countries could catalyze a military clash. And yet, both sides lack effective communication channels and other mechanisms that would reduce the risk of escalation. U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently sought a meeting with his Chinese counterpart but was rebuffed by Beijing officials, who blamed Washington for the challenges in bilateral military-to-military communications.  

U.S. efforts to establish crisis communication mechanisms have a history of failure. Some observers now speculate that it will take a bilateral crisis as potentially catastrophic as the Cuban missile crisis before U.S.-China crisis management mechanisms are institutionalized.  

On June 13, USIP hosted a discussion on the challenges of U.S.-China crisis management. The conversation explored the assumptions that the United States and China hold about one other that could turn a crisis into a conflict, considered how to mitigate this possibility, and discussed previous efforts to negotiate improved communications with Beijing.

Take part in the conversation on Twitter using #USChinaComms.

Speakers

Chad Sbragia 
Research Analyst, Institute for Defense Analyses

Devin Ellis 
Senior Faculty Specialist, College of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Maryland

Michael D. Swaine 
Senior Research Fellow, Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft

Carla Freeman, moderator
Senior Expert, China, U.S. Institute of Peace
 

Related Publications

Blinken’s China Trip Shows Both Sides Want to Stabilize Ties

Blinken’s China Trip Shows Both Sides Want to Stabilize Ties

Tuesday, April 30, 2024

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken traveled to China last week as part of a series of recent high-level contacts between Washington and Beijing. Although no major breakthroughs came out of the trip, it demonstrates that both sides want to prevent bilateral ties from sinking any lower, even as U.S.-China competition continues to intensify.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

China's Vision for Global Security: Implications for Southeast Asia

China's Vision for Global Security: Implications for Southeast Asia

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

China’s Global Security Initiative (GSI) marks a new phase in Beijing’s ongoing push to change the international security order. Through the GSI, China seeks to establish itself as a counterbalance to U.S. influence and to reshape security management in a number of strategically important regions. The GSI is still in the early stages of implementation, but it has already demonstrated the potential to disrupt the existing security framework in Southeast Asia. This may lead to increased polarization within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), with some member states aligning with the GSI and others remaining cautious due to their stronger affiliations with the United States.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

China Forces Myanmar Scam Syndicates to Move to Thai Border

China Forces Myanmar Scam Syndicates to Move to Thai Border

Monday, April 22, 2024

While Myanmar has long been the chief venue for the criminal operations of Chinese-origin gangs in Southeast Asia, these organizations have always stood ready to move — internally or across borders — if their sources of protection dissolved. In recent months, the organized crime kingpins have once again faced a fraying safety net. This time, the cause is the weakening of Myanmar’s corrupt coup regime in the face of a rising, multi-front revolution and, perhaps more importantly, an aggressive push by China’s law enforcement authorities.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

View All Publications