The ouster of Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak in February 2011 was brought about using the tools of nonviolent action, including massive protests and nationwide strikes. Yet the transition that followed showed that initiating change through nonviolent action is no guarantee of a peaceful, smooth path to democracy. This report, based on data on 72 political transitions that occurred between 1945 and 2019, provides key insights into the kinds of mobilization, in terms of tactics and actors, that tend to be most effective in carrying transitions to a democratic outcome.

Protesters celebrate in Tahrir Square in downtown Cairo on February 12, 2011, the day after the announced resignation of President Hosni Mubarak, who had led the country for 30 years. (Photo by Emilio Morenatti/AP)
Protesters celebrate in Tahrir Square in downtown Cairo on February 12, 2011, the day after the announced resignation of President Hosni Mubarak, who had led the country for 30 years. (Photo by Emilio Morenatti/AP)

Summary

Nonviolent action has been a potent force in initiating peaceful transitions away from authoritarian regimes and promoting democratization. Yet the initial breakthrough of a nonviolent action campaign is no guarantee of a future peaceful democracy. Political transitions following nonviolent action campaigns are fraught with challenges, particularly related to the need to continue civic mobilization to shape a transition’s trajectory and hold new elites accountable. Research to date has provided little systematic information on how civic mobilization evolves during these periods of political transition, or on how patterns of mobilization affect the possibility of democracy and the potential for transitional violence. This report describes and presents findings from one of the first data collection efforts aimed at filling this gap: the Civic Mobilization in Civil Resistance Transitions (CM-CRT) dataset. The dataset contains detailed information on roughly 1,600 mobilization events in 72 political transitions that took place between 1945 and 2019.

Analysis of these data help answer three key questions: first, what are the general patterns and trends of mobilization in transitions following nonviolent action campaigns? Second, which forms of mobilization impact the likelihood of democracy? Third, which forms of mobilization tend to lead to violence? The report finds that mobilization by workers during a transition has positive effects on the likelihood of post-transition democracy, and that events that involve violence or that have narrow, factionalizing goals have negative effects on post-transition democracy. Confrontational public tactics like marches, protests, and sit-ins are correlated with a risk of transitional violence, though much of this risk appears to be due to the increased probability of government repression. 

The report concludes with recommendations for greater engagement with organized labor, and, when possible, security sector reform to reduce the likelihood of government repression. Training activists in nonviolent discipline may also be a fruitful avenue for reducing the likelihood of transitional violence.

About the Report

This report examines the dynamics of civic mobilization in political transitions initiated through major nonviolent action campaigns, with a particular focus on forms of mobilization that promote democracy and prevent breakdowns into violence. It is based on data in the Civic Mobilization in Civil Resistance Transitions (CM-CRT) dataset on 72 political transitions that occurred between 1945 and 2019. The research was supported by an interagency agreement between the United States Institute of Peace and USAID’s Center for Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance.

About the Author

Jonathan Pinckney is a senior researcher with the Program on Nonviolent Action at the United States Institute of Peace. He is the author of several USIP reports, journal articles, and the study From Dissent to Democracy: The Promise and Peril of Civil Resistance Transitions, which was published in 2020 by Oxford University Press.
 

Related Publications

Have Haitians Finally Found the Formula for Moving Forward?

Have Haitians Finally Found the Formula for Moving Forward?

Wednesday, March 22, 2023

By: Keith Mines

The headlines from Haiti have been so bad for so long that few get the world’s attention anymore. It seems like nearly every day there are stories of dozens being killed in the country’s capital or of the U.S. Coast Guard stopping hundreds of Haitian migrants from reaching U.S. shores. Then there are the more ominous headlines that say war or even a Rwanda-style massacre are approaching amid the countries “nightmarish conditions.” But at the end of last year, an underreported development could help put the country on a new path, injecting a glimmer of hope despite much pessimism.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Democracy & GovernanceFragility & Resilience

Ask the Experts: What Does Libya Need for Elections to Succeed?

Ask the Experts: What Does Libya Need for Elections to Succeed?

Monday, March 20, 2023

By: Thomas M. Hill;  Tarek Megerisi

Abdoulaye Bathily, the U.N. secretary-general’s special representative for Libya, recently announced his new plan for elections in Libya, which he hopes will take place later this year. But the plan itself was light on implementation, and after similar plans collapsed in 2021, the U.N. will need to learn from past shortcomings to ensure there is not only a solid basis for elections, but a strong foundation for what comes after as well.

Type: Blog

Democracy & GovernancePeace Processes

Nigeria’s Vote Signals Risks: How Its Partners Can Support Democracy

Nigeria’s Vote Signals Risks: How Its Partners Can Support Democracy

Thursday, March 9, 2023

By: James Rupert

Nigeria’s disputed election 12 days ago is raising protest at home and concern abroad over its implications for the strength of democracy in that country and across Africa. Yesterday’s new wrinkle was the postponement of this week’s planned election for Nigerian state governors. Nigeria’s electoral commission is working to fix problems in a vote management system that failed to transparently process and report a result on February 25. An erosion of democracy’s credibility in Africa’s most populous nation would be catastrophic.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Democracy & GovernanceElectoral Violence

What Does U.S. Reengagement in Papua New Guinea Mean for Bougainville?

What Does U.S. Reengagement in Papua New Guinea Mean for Bougainville?

Thursday, March 9, 2023

By: Gordon Peake, Ph.D.;  Camilla Pohle-Anderson

As Washington reengages in the Pacific, it must not overlook Bougainville, an autonomous and want-away region of Papua New Guinea. The United States is neutral on Bougainville’s future political status, which is for Papua New Guinea and Bougainville to resolve. Nevertheless, Washington should recall long U.S.-Bougainville historical ties, and consider how the Pacific Partnership Strategy could be leveraged to benefit the people of Bougainville, whatever their future political status might be.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Global PolicyDemocracy & Governance

View All Publications