The ouster of Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak in February 2011 was brought about using the tools of nonviolent action, including massive protests and nationwide strikes. Yet the transition that followed showed that initiating change through nonviolent action is no guarantee of a peaceful, smooth path to democracy. This report, based on data on 72 political transitions that occurred between 1945 and 2019, provides key insights into the kinds of mobilization, in terms of tactics and actors, that tend to be most effective in carrying transitions to a democratic outcome.

Protesters celebrate in Tahrir Square in downtown Cairo on February 12, 2011, the day after the announced resignation of President Hosni Mubarak, who had led the country for 30 years. (Photo by Emilio Morenatti/AP)
Protesters celebrate in Tahrir Square in downtown Cairo on February 12, 2011, the day after the announced resignation of President Hosni Mubarak, who had led the country for 30 years. (Photo by Emilio Morenatti/AP)

Summary

Nonviolent action has been a potent force in initiating peaceful transitions away from authoritarian regimes and promoting democratization. Yet the initial breakthrough of a nonviolent action campaign is no guarantee of a future peaceful democracy. Political transitions following nonviolent action campaigns are fraught with challenges, particularly related to the need to continue civic mobilization to shape a transition’s trajectory and hold new elites accountable. Research to date has provided little systematic information on how civic mobilization evolves during these periods of political transition, or on how patterns of mobilization affect the possibility of democracy and the potential for transitional violence. This report describes and presents findings from one of the first data collection efforts aimed at filling this gap: the Civic Mobilization in Civil Resistance Transitions (CM-CRT) dataset. The dataset contains detailed information on roughly 1,600 mobilization events in 72 political transitions that took place between 1945 and 2019.

Analysis of these data help answer three key questions: first, what are the general patterns and trends of mobilization in transitions following nonviolent action campaigns? Second, which forms of mobilization impact the likelihood of democracy? Third, which forms of mobilization tend to lead to violence? The report finds that mobilization by workers during a transition has positive effects on the likelihood of post-transition democracy, and that events that involve violence or that have narrow, factionalizing goals have negative effects on post-transition democracy. Confrontational public tactics like marches, protests, and sit-ins are correlated with a risk of transitional violence, though much of this risk appears to be due to the increased probability of government repression. 

The report concludes with recommendations for greater engagement with organized labor, and, when possible, security sector reform to reduce the likelihood of government repression. Training activists in nonviolent discipline may also be a fruitful avenue for reducing the likelihood of transitional violence.

About the Report

This report examines the dynamics of civic mobilization in political transitions initiated through major nonviolent action campaigns, with a particular focus on forms of mobilization that promote democracy and prevent breakdowns into violence. It is based on data in the Civic Mobilization in Civil Resistance Transitions (CM-CRT) dataset on 72 political transitions that occurred between 1945 and 2019. The research was supported by an interagency agreement between the United States Institute of Peace and USAID’s Center for Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance.

About the Author

Jonathan Pinckney is a senior researcher with the Program on Nonviolent Action at the United States Institute of Peace. He is the author of several USIP reports, journal articles, and the study From Dissent to Democracy: The Promise and Peril of Civil Resistance Transitions, which was published in 2020 by Oxford University Press.
 

Related Publications

What to Know About Gabon’s Coup

What to Know About Gabon’s Coup

Thursday, August 31, 2023

By: Archibald S. Henry;  Elizabeth Murray

On August 30, just hours after Gabon’s election commission announced that President Ali Bongo Ondimba had been elected to a third term, a group of Gabonese military officers from the elite presidential guard unit seized power and placed the president under arrest at his palace. Later that day, the officers declared General Brice Oligui Nguema as chairman of the transition. While the election itself had been marred by reports of irregularities, the officers’ coup marks the latest in a long line of recent military takeovers across the African continent that have jeopardized regional stability and security.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Democracy & Governance

La movilización juvenil genera esperanza para el futuro democrático de Guatemala

La movilización juvenil genera esperanza para el futuro democrático de Guatemala

Wednesday, August 30, 2023

By: Miriam Psychas

El 20 de agosto, los guatemaltecos votaron decisivamente a favor de Bernardo Arévalo en la segunda vuelta de las elecciones presidenciales, dando paso al que probablemente será el presidente más progresista del país en décadas. En apenas dos meses, el Partido Movimiento Semilla de Arévalo condujo una campaña de bajo presupuesto impulsada, desde las redes sociales, que llevó a un candidato poco conocido a una victoria aplastante de 20 puntos.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Democracy & GovernanceYouth

Youth Mobilization Sparks Hope for Guatemala’s Democratic Future

Youth Mobilization Sparks Hope for Guatemala’s Democratic Future

Monday, August 28, 2023

By: Miriam Psychas

On August 20, Guatemalans voted decisively in favor of Bernardo Arévalo in their runoff presidential election, ushering in what will likely be the country’s most progressive president in decades. In just two months, Arévalo’s Movimiento Semilla party used its low-budget, social media-fueled campaign to propel him from obscure underdog candidate to a 20-point landslide victory.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Democracy & GovernanceYouth

¿Cómo deberían responder los Estados Unidos a la influencia China en América Latina?

¿Cómo deberían responder los Estados Unidos a la influencia China en América Latina?

Monday, August 28, 2023

By: Nicolás Devia-Valbuena;  Gen. Alberto Mejia

El 21 de agosto, el Parlamento Centroamericano – organismo regional regional que representa a Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, la República Dominicana y Panamá – votó a favor de expulsar a Taiwán como observador permanente y sustituirlo por la República Popular China (RPC).

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Democracy & GovernanceGlobal Policy

View All Publications