Afghanistan’s government is accelerating its release of thousands of Taliban prisoners as a step toward peace talks, President Ashraf Ghani told an online audience today. The number of prisoners freed should now surpass 3,000, Ghani said, announcing that 2,000 more will be released “within a very short period.” That move, taking the total of freed Taliban fighters to 5,000, would fulfill a central Taliban pre-condition for peace talks. Ghani voiced optimism that a rare “window of opportunity” has opened for peace negotiations, but said further steps are vital to seize the chance to end the nation’s 40-plus years of warfare.

Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, shown speaking at USIP in 2015, announced new Taliban prisoner releases and laid out his vision for Afghanistan’s peace process. He spoke in an online discussion from Kabul that was broadcast nationally in Afghanistan.
Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, shown speaking at USIP in 2015, announced new Taliban prisoner releases and laid out his vision for Afghanistan’s peace process. He spoke in an online discussion from Kabul that was broadcast nationally in Afghanistan.

Following his latest talks with officials from the United States, Pakistan and Qatar, Ghani expressed hope that “next week we should be able to inform the world of the next step” in peace efforts. He spoke from Kabul in an online discussion hosted by USIP and the Washington-based Atlantic Council.

“President Ghani’s optimistic tone reflects significant progress over the past several weeks” said Scott Worden, USIP’s director for Afghanistan. After Taliban violence increased in April, “we saw a series of atrocious attacks by ISIS against Afghan civilians that nearly derailed the peace process,” he noted. “But then a three-day cease-fire in May, over the Eid al-Fitr holiday, reduced violence and led the government and the Taliban closer to talks.” 

That cease-fire came just days after Ghani and his rival in last September’s presidential election, Abdullah Abdullah, reached a power-sharing arrangement following Ghani’s disputed victory in the vote. “Resolving that political impasse was a significant breakthough,” said Worden. In the discussion, Ghani’s described “cooperation between him and Dr. Abdullah on a common approach to peace that significantly strengthens the government’s negotiating hand,” said Worden. Together, the truce and the Ghani-Abdullah accord could prove to have been a turning point in hopes for peacemaking, according to another USIP Afghanistan analyst, Scott Smith.

Ghani: Taliban Must Reciprocate

Ghani’s statements represented an acceptance of the February 29 agreement reached by U.S. and Taliban negotiators. That negotiation—from which the Afghan government was excluded at the Taliban’s insistence—called for 5,000 Taliban and 1,000 government troops or police to be freed by March 10.

Ghani insisted that the government’s accelerated pace of prisoner releases must be reciprocated by the Taliban, which he said has been unclear even about how many government troops and police they are holding prisoner. This “issue needs to be highlighted,” he said. “The members of the Afghan security and defense forces that have been imprisoned by the Taliban have not been completely released. It’s important that the commitment, because this is a mutual commitment, is fulfilled.”

Now, Ghani said, the Taliban are inconsistent about how many government prisoners they hold. “They claimed 1,000; the number keeps shifting,” he said. “We need clarity regarding the fate of those [prisoners] that are with them and assurance that the last person remaining with them is released.

Under the U.S.-Taliban agreement, the Taliban have stopped attacking U.S. troops but are continuing to attack Afghan government forces and civilians. “There has been …[a] reduction of violence,” Ghani said, “but the casualty figures still average around 60 to 70 a day. The number of fatalities, unfortunately, are averaging 30. It’s extremely important for public support that [violence] reduction reaches the maximum effect, and also that we ensure that irreconcilables and spoilers are not given an opportunity.”

President Ghani with USIP’s Stephen Hadley and former Senator Kelly Ayotte. The event was co-hosted by the Atlantic Council.
President Ghani with USIP’s Stephen Hadley and former Senator Kelly Ayotte. The event was co-hosted by the Atlantic Council.

Among the key points in Ghani’s discussion were these:

  • Conciliatory language on Pakistan. Ghani noted a visit to Kabul this week by the military commander of neighboring Pakistan, General Qamar Javed Bajwa. While Pakistani officials routinely voice formal support for Afghan peace and independence, Pakistan historically has offered a sanctuary for the Taliban and Pakistani relations with the Afghan government have been strained. “We feel that we have come to the closest alignment with Pakistan in terms of discourse,” Ghani said, and “we hope that we will be able to turn this into opportunity for alignment.” He added that he and Bajwa “both agreed that country is developed within regions and the immense opportunity that India presents is extremely important.” Because Pakistan sees India, to its east, as its greatest security threat, Pakistani leaders historically have been suspicious of close Indian ties with Afghanistan.
  • Ghani’s message for Congress and Americans. Ghani took a question from former U.S. Senator Kelly Ayotte, who co-chairs the Afghanistan Study Group. The group, facilitated by USIP, is conducting a congressionally mandated review of the Afghan peace process and its implications for U.S. interests. Ayotte noted skepticism among many Americans about the value of U.S. help for Afghanistan. Ghani noted that American defense and security officials typically describe to him U.S. interest in Afghanistan as protection against the risks of terrorism that can arise from poorly governed regions. “You have no obligation to us,” he said. “You fulfilled your moral obligation, both in blood and treasure and as always I pay tribute to the fallen heroes of the U.S. forces. This is a partnership that has to have mutual interests and mutual respect.” Ghani said the current peace effort “is a time-bound and condition-based schedule, and I think the goal of the American people can be achieved.” To a query from former CIA director and U.S. commander in Afghanistan David Petraeus, Ghani underscored that he wants to include in any peace agreement with the Taliban their cooperation in rooting out terrorism and Afghanistan’s large illegal narcotics industry.
  • Inclusion of women in a peace process. To questions from listeners online, Ghani said his May 17 agreement with Abdullah has let his government begin preparing for actual peace talks, as Abdullah takes leadership of the government’s High Peace Council. While Afghan women activists have said women are being marginalized from many parts of the peace process, Ghani said women will be well represented both in the peace council and in his new cabinet.
  • Discussion of an interim government ‘premature.’ A Wall Street Journal correspondent asked Ghani about his willingness to step aside in favor of an interim government as part of a peace process. He called the question “premature,” saying, “I serve at the will of the Afghan people, not at the will of the Taliban.” He added: “The key issue is not the president but the republic. Afghan consensus, he said, will insist on retaining “the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan as a sovereign, democratic and united republic” formed of citizens, Ghani said. The formulation is a rebuff to the Taliban notion of an Islamic emirate whose people would be subjects owing the government their fealty.

Related Publications

The Latest @ USIP: Religious Inclusion in Afghanistan

The Latest @ USIP: Religious Inclusion in Afghanistan

Tuesday, February 7, 2023

By: Charles Ramsey

The Taliban often use religious arguments to justify their claim to authority. But the Taliban are just one aspect of Afghanistan, and the caretaker government has failed to justify many of its more draconian policies — especially those against women and girls. Charles Ramsey, a resident scholar at Baylor University's Institute for the Studies of Religion and a senior fellow at the Religious Freedom Institute, discusses the role that other religious actors in Afghanistan can play in shaping the country’s future and how positively engaging with these religious leaders can contribute to building peace.

Type: Blog

Peace ProcessesReligion

Wrestling with a Humanitarian Dilemma in Afghanistan

Wrestling with a Humanitarian Dilemma in Afghanistan

Wednesday, January 25, 2023

By: William Byrd, Ph.D.

Recent decrees by the Taliban barring Afghan women from attending university or working in NGOs are severely damaging the country both socially and economically, especially coming atop a ban on girls’ secondary education last year. The marginalization of half the population also highlights the “humanitarian dilemma” that aid donors and international agencies face: Afghanistan is highly dependent on humanitarian assistance, not only for saving lives and easing deprivation but also to stabilize its economy. The quandary for international donors is what to do when alleviating suffering benefits the Afghan economy and thereby the Taliban regime, even when that regime is harming its own people?

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Economics

Can the Taliban’s Brazen Assault on Afghan Women Be Stopped?

Can the Taliban’s Brazen Assault on Afghan Women Be Stopped?

Thursday, January 12, 2023

By: Belquis Ahmadi;  Kate Bateman;  Andrew Watkins;  Scott Worden

The Taliban marked the New Year by doubling down on their severe, ever-growing restrictions on women’s rights. On December 20, they banned women from all universities — adding to their prior ban on girls attending middle and high school. Then the Taliban announced on December 24 that women cannot work for NGOs, including humanitarian organizations that are providing vital food and basic health services to the population that is now projected at 90 percent below the poverty rate. Western and regional governments have responded with uncommonly unified outrage and many humanitarian organizations have suspended their operations until women are allowed to return to their jobs.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

GenderHuman Rights

View All Publications