Barnett R. Rubin, Chair of the U.S. Institute of Peace's Afghanistan Working Group, addressed a Capitol-Hill based study group on the challenges confronting post-conflict Afghanistan.

On May 24, 2005, Barnett R. Rubin, Chair of the us Institute of Peace’s Afghanistan Working Group, addressed the Capitol-Hill based study group “Security for a New Century 109th Congress” on the challenges confronting postconflict Afghanistan, specifically the illegal narcotics trade. He argued that narcotics trafficking poses a major threat to the future stability of Afghanistan because drug money finances illegal armed groups, illicit government structures and terrorists.

He expressed deep concern that the country and its citizens are at risk of becoming dependent on “dirty money” because illicit narcotics currently constitute such an overwhelming proportion of Afghanistan’s economy. Rubin cautioned, however, that long-term us interests in a stable Afghanistan could be damaged if counter-narcotics operations are not conducted correctly and in the right sequence. He argued in favor of a four-part us policy in the following order:

  • Financial support to develop alternative sources of income for Afghans and provide debt relief to farmers as well as build roads and other infrastructure;
  • Macroeconomic support to help prevent currency collapse and maintain government revenue;
  • Law enforcement assistance focusing on arresting traffickers and political sponsors of the illegal drug trade and shutting down laboratories that convert opium to mescaline and heroin; and,
  • Eradication of poppy fields.

According to Rubin, the Afghan population currently does not see eradication efforts as legitimate at because growing poppy for most farmers is an act of subsistence. If the proper steps are taken to provide alternative livelihoods for farmers, he argued, that will change.

Rubin said that winning and keeping popular support for us policies and the central Afghan government is necessary to successfully root out the narcotics economy in Afghanistan.

 

The views expressed here are not necessarily those of USIP, which does not advocate specific policy positions.


Related Publications

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

When announcing the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in April 2021, President Joe Biden identified counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan as an enduring and critical US national security interest. This priority became even more pronounced after the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, the discovery of al-Qaeda’s leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul less than a year later, and the increasing threat of the Islamic State of Khorasan (ISIS-K) from Afghanistan. However, owing to the escalating pressures of strategic competition with China and Russia, counterterrorism has significantly dropped in importance in the policy agenda.

Type: Report

Violent Extremism

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Thursday, May 9, 2024

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant. Indeed, at the end of March, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of ISIS launched a devastating attack outside of Moscow, killing over 140 people.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyViolent Extremism

Despite Daunting Economic Headwinds, Afghan Private Sector Shows Signs of Life

Despite Daunting Economic Headwinds, Afghan Private Sector Shows Signs of Life

Thursday, May 2, 2024

Three years after the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, the country’s economy remains in a dismal state marked by depression-level price deflation, high unemployment and a collapse of GDP. Still, while the bad news for Afghans is well known, less visible are some green shoots in the country’s private sector that, if properly encouraged, could mitigate the situation. These range from small business activity to Taliban plans for major projects to the potential for an uptick in investment. Clearly nothing in those developments can stimulate a strong economic revival.

Type: Analysis

Economics

The Latest @ USIP: Reclaiming Human Rights in Afghanistan

The Latest @ USIP: Reclaiming Human Rights in Afghanistan

Wednesday, April 17, 2024

Since taking power in 2021, the Taliban have imposed their own interpretation of Islamic law onto the people of Afghanistan and consistently rolled back human rights protections — especially for women and girls — all while the country struggles to recover from decades of conflict and economic crisis. USIP spoke with Fatima Gailani, the former president of the Afghan Red Crescent Society, about the various ways Afghans can put pressure on the Taliban to reclaim their rights and demand a better future.

Type: Blog

GenderHuman Rights

View All Publications