Despite trillions of dollars invested in the Afghanistan war and reconstruction effort, the U.S. government failed to achieve an inclusive and durable political settlement to the conflict. Why were negotiations among the three main parties to the conflict — the United States, the Taliban and the Afghan government — ultimately unsuccessful? Why did the United States not prioritize a peace process until it was too late?

On October 25, USIP hosted a conference that brought together former senior officials and top experts to explore these critical questions and identify lessons to inform U.S. policy in the future. The conference featured two public panels that looked at why no meaningful intra-Afghan peace talks took place from 2001 to 2021, as well as the missed opportunities and missteps that derailed efforts to reach a political settlement to the conflict.

Drawing on U.S., Afghan, regional, civilian and military perspectives, these discussions explored how the various parties viewed their interests, incentives and leverage over time, and what key assumptions constrained these actors. The conference probed the extent to which the United States had a political strategy to guide its military strategy, the various parties’ goals and strategy during talks in Doha, and why Afghan government leaders failed to achieve a unified position in negotiations when the Afghan Republic had the most to lose from a failed peace process. 

Given the enormous costs of the failure to achieve a political settlement and the dire conditions in Taliban-run Afghanistan today, the goal of these conversations was not only to advance our collective understanding of why the peace process failed but to inform future U.S. policy in Afghanistan and other conflict-affected countries.

Continue the conversation on Twitter using #AfghanistanUSIP.

Speakers

Learning from Missed Opportunities and Mistakes by the U.S. Government

  • Christopher Kolenda
    Retired U.S. Army Colonel; Adjunct Senior Fellow, Center for a New American Security
  • Dipali Mukhopadhyay
    Associate Professor, Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota; Senior Expert, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Tamanna Salikuddin
    Director, South Asia Programs, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Kate Bateman, moderator
    Senior Expert, Afghanistan, U.S. Institute of Peace

Afghan, Regional and International Perspectives on the Failed Peace Process

  • Masoom Stanekzai
    Former Chief Negotiator, Intelligence Chief, and Defense Minister, Islamic Republic of Afghanistan 
  • Habiba Sarabi
    Former Negotiator, Provincial Governor, and Minister of Women’s Affairs, Islamic Republic of Afghanistan 
  • Steve J. Brooking
    Former Special Advisor on Peace and Reconciliation, U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan
  • Kristian Berg Harpviken
    Research Professor, Peace Research Institute Oslo
  • Scott Worden, moderator
    Director, Afghanistan and Central Asia, U.S. Institute of Peace

Related Publications

Asfandyar Mir on Why ISIS-K Attacked Moscow

Asfandyar Mir on Why ISIS-K Attacked Moscow

Monday, April 1, 2024

By: Asfandyar Mir, Ph.D.

ISIS-K’s recent attack on the Russian capital was, in part, intended to assert the organization’s growing capacity to inflict terror beyond its home base of Afghanistan. “By reaching Moscow, ISIS-K is trying to signal it has the geographic reach to hit anywhere in the world,” says USIP’s Asfandyar Mir.

Type: Podcast

Moscow Concert Hall Attack Will Have Far-Reaching Impact

Moscow Concert Hall Attack Will Have Far-Reaching Impact

Wednesday, March 27, 2024

By: Mary Glantz, Ph.D.;  Gavin Helf, Ph.D.;  Asfandyar Mir, Ph.D.;  Andrew Watkins

On Friday, terrorists attacked the Crocus City Hall outside Moscow leaving 140 people dead and 80 others critically wounded. Soon after, the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attack. The terrorist group, which is headquartered in Iraq and Syria, has several branches, including in South and Central Asia. Press reports suggest the U.S. government believes the Afghanistan-based affiliate of the Islamic State, ISIS-Khorasan (ISIS-K), was behind the attack. The Biden administration has publicly noted that it had warned the Russian government of the terrorism threat in early March in line with the procedure of “Duty to Warn.”

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

The Challenges Facing Afghans with Disabilities

The Challenges Facing Afghans with Disabilities

Thursday, February 29, 2024

By: Belquis Ahmadi

In Afghanistan, obtaining accurate data on the number of persons with disabilities — including gender-disaggregated information — has always been a challenging endeavor. But based on the data we do have, it’s clear that more than four decades of violent conflict have left a considerable portion of the Afghan population grappling with various forms of disabilities, both war-related and otherwise. And the pervasive lack of protective mechanisms, social awareness and empathy surrounding disability continue to pose formidable challenges for individuals with disabilities, with women being disproportionately affected.

Type: Analysis

GenderHuman Rights

What to Expect from the Doha Conference on Afghanistan

What to Expect from the Doha Conference on Afghanistan

Thursday, February 15, 2024

By: Kate Bateman;  Andrew Watkins

On February 18-19, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will convene a meeting on Afghanistan in Doha to discuss the ongoing humanitarian and human rights crises and the recent report on a way forward by U.N. Special Coordinator for Afghanistan Feridun Sinirlioğlu. Special envoys from U.N. member states and international organizations will attend; representatives from Afghan civil society, women’s groups and Taliban officials have also been invited. The conference is a critical, high-level opportunity for donors and the region to chart next steps on how to improve the situation in Afghanistan and engage with the Taliban regime.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications