On June 2, 2015, the U.S Institute of Peace and the FP Group, publisher of Foreign Policy magazine and foreignpolicy.com, hosted the fourth installment of PeaceGame. This PeaceGame tackled one of the most challenging of issues confronted by the U.S. government and stakeholders worldwide: the global rise of radical groups and violent extremism.

PG

Building on a successful first session in December exploring the political and economic roots of extremism and violence, our June event will focus on the human element: why do today’s extremist movements attract recruits worldwide, and how can the international community more effectively both counter this appeal and manage the reintegration of radicalized individuals.  

Employing PeaceGame’s innovative, scenario-based, multi-media model, our diverse group of participants will together work through the range of complex challenges around both the recruitment and the return of foreign fighters – from strategies to counter recruitment efforts to the risks and potential rehabilitation of fighters returning from conflict. 

Agenda

7:30-8:30 a.m. Registration and Breakfast

8:30-8:45 a.m. Welcome and Introduction
David Rothkopf, CEO and Editor, The FP Group
Nancy Lindborg, President, United States Institute of Peace

8:45-9:45 a.m. Framing Discussion: “The Search for an Effective Counter Strategy”

9:45-10:00 a.m. Break and Refreshments

10:00-12:15 p.m. Scenario I: “What if They Gave a War and Nobody Came?: Commanding the Virtual High Ground and Other Strategies for Preventing and Defeating Information Age Insurgencies

12:15-1:00 p.m. Lunch Break

1:00-2:00 p.m. Framing Discussion: “Offering Alternatives to Today’s Insurgents: Myths and Realities About What Works”

2:00-4:15 p.m. Scenario II: “Combatting Contagion: What’s Next for the Defeated or Homeward Bound Extremist?”

4:15-4:30 p.m. Break and Refreshments

4:30-5:15 p.m. Concluding Session: “Formulating Recommendations: Shaping Strategies and Setting Priorities”

5:15 p.m. Event Concludes
 

PeaceGame 2015 Participants

  • H.E. Rouda Al Otaiba, UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  • Muath Al Wari, Washington, D.C.-based Middle East Analyst
  • Graham Allison, Director, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School of Government
  • Nada Bakos, Former CIA analyst
  • BG Shlomo Brom, Center for American Progress
  • Katherine Brown, King’s College of London
  • Dan Brumberg, U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP)
  • Mary Casey-Baker, The Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington
  • Jocelyne Cesari, Georgetown University Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs
  • Leanne Erdberg, U.S. Department of State
  • Masood Farivar, Voice of America
  • Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, Foundation for Defense of Democracies
  • Viola Gienger, U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP)
  • Amb. Gordon Gray, Former U.S. Ambassador to Tunisia; now Deputy Commandant, National War College
  • Stephen J. Hadley, Chairman of the Board, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Michael Wahid Hanna, The Century Foundation
  • Simon Henderson, The Washington Institute
  • Nicholas Heras, Center for a New American Security
  • Georgia Holmer, U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP)
  • Nkechi “Payton” Iheme, White House, Office of Science and Technology Policy
  • Jorgen Ilum, Danish National Police
  • James Jeffrey, Former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey
  • Brian Michael Jenkins, RAND Corporation
  • Emad Kiyaei, Princeton/American Iranian Council
  • Nancy Lindborg, President, U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP)
  • Sascha Meinrath, X-Labs
  • Jonathon Morgan, CrisisNET
  • Douglas Ollivant, New America Foundation
  • Manal Omar, U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP)
  • Farah Pandith, Former Special Representative to Muslim Communities, U.S. Department of State
  • Tom Parker, United Nations Counterterrorism Implementation Task Force
  • Thomas Pierret, University of Edinburgh
  • Taufiq Rahim, Globesight
  • Susan Reichle, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
  • Sarnata Reynolds, Refugees International
  • David Rothkopf, CEO and Editor, Foreign Policy
  • Tom Sanderson, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)
  • Edit Schlaffer, Women Without Borders
  • Barbara Slavin, The Atlantic Council
  • Phillip Smyth, University of Maryland
  • Thomas Staal, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
  • Lara Talverdian, The Atlantic Council
  • Tomicah Tillemann, New America
  • Rabih Torbay, International Medical Corps
  • Gregory Treverton, Chairman, National Intelligence Council
  • Lorenzo Vidino, has held positions at CSS, RAND, Belfer Center

 

Related Publications

Myanmar Coup Weakens Southeast Asia Security and Cooperation

Myanmar Coup Weakens Southeast Asia Security and Cooperation

Tuesday, April 13, 2021

By: Brian Harding; Jason Tower

Southeast Asian governments have reacted to the coup in Myanmar in diverse ways that reflect divergent interests. Some, such as Singapore, have condemned the generals’ violence against anti-coup protesters. Others, including Vietnam, have strategic concerns behind their limited willingness to speak out. Cambodia may believe it benefits from the takeover as international attention shifts to Myanmar. They can all agree, though, that fallout from the coup is damaging the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) at a time when the broader regional order is in flux.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Global Policy

Getting to the Source: The Importance of Field Research

Getting to the Source: The Importance of Field Research

Wednesday, April 7, 2021

By: Alastair Reed; Boglarka Bozsogi

Travel restrictions and social distancing practices put in place in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have largely ground field research to a halt. Fieldwork plays an essential but often underappreciated role in both understanding violent extremism and developing policy responses to it. It is vital, therefore, that funders and policymakers support the return of such important work in a post-pandemic world.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Education & Training

China’s High-Stakes Calculations in Myanmar

China’s High-Stakes Calculations in Myanmar

Wednesday, April 7, 2021

By: Jason Tower

The ultimate outcome of Myanmar’s nine-week-old coup will affect a range of international actors — but none more than China. As Asia’s greatest power, China has strategic and economic stakes in its neighbor to the south that leave little space for genuine neutrality behind a façade of non-interference. Since February 1, Beijing has profoundly shaped the trajectory of post-coup violence and blocked international efforts to restore stability.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Global Policy

Toward a Gender-Inclusive National Security Strategy

Toward a Gender-Inclusive National Security Strategy

Tuesday, March 30, 2021

By: Anthony Navone

With the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) Act of 2017, the United States is the only country in the world to codify into law women’s critical role in building peace and security. The law requires the Department of Defense, among several U.S. government agencies, to create strategies that prioritize the perspectives, safety and meaningful participation of women across all facets of national security — a critical factor in addressing the complex challenges facing the United States.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Gender; Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications