On June 2, 2015, the U.S Institute of Peace and the FP Group, publisher of Foreign Policy magazine and foreignpolicy.com, hosted the fourth installment of PeaceGame. This PeaceGame tackled one of the most challenging of issues confronted by the U.S. government and stakeholders worldwide: the global rise of radical groups and violent extremism.

PG

Building on a successful first session in December exploring the political and economic roots of extremism and violence, our June event will focus on the human element: why do today’s extremist movements attract recruits worldwide, and how can the international community more effectively both counter this appeal and manage the reintegration of radicalized individuals.  

Employing PeaceGame’s innovative, scenario-based, multi-media model, our diverse group of participants will together work through the range of complex challenges around both the recruitment and the return of foreign fighters – from strategies to counter recruitment efforts to the risks and potential rehabilitation of fighters returning from conflict. 

Agenda

7:30-8:30 a.m. Registration and Breakfast

8:30-8:45 a.m. Welcome and Introduction
David Rothkopf, CEO and Editor, The FP Group
Nancy Lindborg, President, United States Institute of Peace

8:45-9:45 a.m. Framing Discussion: “The Search for an Effective Counter Strategy”

9:45-10:00 a.m. Break and Refreshments

10:00-12:15 p.m. Scenario I: “What if They Gave a War and Nobody Came?: Commanding the Virtual High Ground and Other Strategies for Preventing and Defeating Information Age Insurgencies

12:15-1:00 p.m. Lunch Break

1:00-2:00 p.m. Framing Discussion: “Offering Alternatives to Today’s Insurgents: Myths and Realities About What Works”

2:00-4:15 p.m. Scenario II: “Combatting Contagion: What’s Next for the Defeated or Homeward Bound Extremist?”

4:15-4:30 p.m. Break and Refreshments

4:30-5:15 p.m. Concluding Session: “Formulating Recommendations: Shaping Strategies and Setting Priorities”

5:15 p.m. Event Concludes
 

PeaceGame 2015 Participants

  • H.E. Rouda Al Otaiba, UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  • Muath Al Wari, Washington, D.C.-based Middle East Analyst
  • Graham Allison, Director, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School of Government
  • Nada Bakos, Former CIA analyst
  • BG Shlomo Brom, Center for American Progress
  • Katherine Brown, King’s College of London
  • Dan Brumberg, U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP)
  • Mary Casey-Baker, The Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington
  • Jocelyne Cesari, Georgetown University Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs
  • Leanne Erdberg, U.S. Department of State
  • Masood Farivar, Voice of America
  • Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, Foundation for Defense of Democracies
  • Viola Gienger, U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP)
  • Amb. Gordon Gray, Former U.S. Ambassador to Tunisia; now Deputy Commandant, National War College
  • Stephen J. Hadley, Chairman of the Board, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Michael Wahid Hanna, The Century Foundation
  • Simon Henderson, The Washington Institute
  • Nicholas Heras, Center for a New American Security
  • Georgia Holmer, U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP)
  • Nkechi “Payton” Iheme, White House, Office of Science and Technology Policy
  • Jorgen Ilum, Danish National Police
  • James Jeffrey, Former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey
  • Brian Michael Jenkins, RAND Corporation
  • Emad Kiyaei, Princeton/American Iranian Council
  • Nancy Lindborg, President, U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP)
  • Sascha Meinrath, X-Labs
  • Jonathon Morgan, CrisisNET
  • Douglas Ollivant, New America Foundation
  • Manal Omar, U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP)
  • Farah Pandith, Former Special Representative to Muslim Communities, U.S. Department of State
  • Tom Parker, United Nations Counterterrorism Implementation Task Force
  • Thomas Pierret, University of Edinburgh
  • Taufiq Rahim, Globesight
  • Susan Reichle, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
  • Sarnata Reynolds, Refugees International
  • David Rothkopf, CEO and Editor, Foreign Policy
  • Tom Sanderson, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)
  • Edit Schlaffer, Women Without Borders
  • Barbara Slavin, The Atlantic Council
  • Phillip Smyth, University of Maryland
  • Thomas Staal, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
  • Lara Talverdian, The Atlantic Council
  • Tomicah Tillemann, New America
  • Rabih Torbay, International Medical Corps
  • Gregory Treverton, Chairman, National Intelligence Council
  • Lorenzo Vidino, has held positions at CSS, RAND, Belfer Center

 

Related Publications

The Latest: 3 Things to Know on Rohingya Refugees in Bangladesh

The Latest: 3 Things to Know on Rohingya Refugees in Bangladesh

Tuesday, June 6, 2023

By: Geoffrey Macdonald, Ph.D.

In August 2017, Myanmar’s military drove around 750,000 Rohingya Muslims into Bangladesh. The Bangladeshi government and citizens responded generously, providing food, shelter and other forms of assistance. But a USIP survey shows that Bangladeshis' views on the situation have markedly changed in the last five years, with many supporting less assistance and harsher policies toward the Rohingya. USIP’s Geoffrey Macdonald, who is also a senior advisor for Asia at the International Republican Institute, discusses why Bangladeshi views have evolved, what conflict dynamics inside and outside of refugee camps look like, and what policymakers should do to help address the situation.

Type: Blog

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Understanding India’s Manipur Conflict and Its Geopolitical Implications

Understanding India’s Manipur Conflict and Its Geopolitical Implications

Friday, June 2, 2023

By: Binalakshmi Nepram;  Brigitta W. Schuchert

Since May 3, the northeastern Indian state of Manipur has witnessed repeated inter-ethnic clashes primarily between two local ethnic communities, the Meitei and Kuki. The violence has resulted in over 75 deaths and the burning of at least 1,700 buildings (including homes and religious sites). More than 35,000 people are currently displaced as well, with many now living in one of the 315 relief camps in the state. As the fighting continues, these numbers may also be rising.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Why We Should All Worry About the China-India Border Dispute

Why We Should All Worry About the China-India Border Dispute

Wednesday, May 31, 2023

By: Nishant Rajeev;  Alex Stephenson

The December 2022 clash between Chinese and Indian troops along the two countries’ 2,100-mile-long contested border — known as the Line of Actual Control (LAC) — highlights a worrying “one step forward, two steps back” trend. This brawl was the worst since 2020, when fighting in the Galwan Valley took the lives of 20 Indian and at least four Chinese soldiers. Although these clashes are often followed by dialogue and other steps to reduce tensions, both sides have increasingly militarized their border policies and shown no indication of backing down. And the situation on the border remains tense, as Beijing and New Delhi are hardening their positions on either side of the LAC, with the potential for escalation between the two nuclear-armed powers.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

The Latest @ USIP: Peace Games and Crisis Preparedness

The Latest @ USIP: Peace Games and Crisis Preparedness

Tuesday, May 23, 2023

By: Sale Lilly

When a crisis or disaster strikes, organizations and institutions usually don’t have time to suddenly revise or change their policy. Games or simulations allow actors to plan ahead and ensure that their response system is prepared for whatever might unfold. Sale Lilly, a designer of war games and crisis simulations, discusses applying his work to peacebuilding, why building off historical scenarios can add a layer a realism to the exercise, and why inviting the right people is just as important as the design itself.

Type: Blog

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications