In the context of rising authoritarianism, civil society plays a crucial role in shifting the power balance to ensure societies are more peaceful and just. Nongovernmental organizations, civic associations and activists are far from passive victims of authoritarian rule. They can deploy a wide range of tactics and strategies — from lobbying to protesting and other forms of nonviolent action — to effectively challenge unjust power structures and bring about peaceful change. This is true even as they face authoritarians who have increasing access to digital technologies and artificial intelligence, allowing for more sophisticated surveillance and censorship.  

On November 15, USIP hosted a conversation with civic leaders, scholars and donors on the role of civil society actors in authoritarian contexts and what the international community can do to support them. The discussion drew on their experiences and knowledge to share lessons about how advocacy and other forms of nonviolent action can be effective in closed civic spaces. 

Speakers

Rosie Levine, opening remarks
Senior Program Analyst, China, U.S. Institute of Peace 

Florence Nakazibwe, moderator 
Senior Legal Advisor, International Center for Not-for-Profit Law 

Jessica Teets
Professor, Middlebury College; Associate Editor-in-Chief, The Journal of Chinese Political Science

Ivan Marovic
Executive Director, International Center on Nonviolent Conflict

Sokphea Young
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Anthropology Department, University College London

Related Publications

Whither Cease-fire Talks After Hamas Kills 6 Israeli Hostages?

Whither Cease-fire Talks After Hamas Kills 6 Israeli Hostages?

Wednesday, September 4, 2024

Israeli soldiers’ discovery of six of their country’s hostages shot dead in a tunnel underneath Rafah, Gaza has placed the question of a cease-fire’s prospects in stark relief. Coming as the U.S. had already stepped up efforts to push for an Israel-Hamas agreement, the grim fate of the hostages can simultaneously be viewed as providing a catalyst for the urgent conclusion of a deal, or as a harbinger of diplomatic derailment for a process the U.S., Egypt and Qatar had been in the throes of pushing to resolution.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & PreventionPeace Processes

The New Dynamics of Contemporary Conflicts (Discussion Paper 24-003)

The New Dynamics of Contemporary Conflicts (Discussion Paper 24-003)

Thursday, August 29, 2024

USIP convened an expert panel of scholars and researchers over a four-month period in 2023–24 to explore lessons learned from the management of conflicts in prior periods of global turbulence. This is the first paper in a three-part series from the convenings and focuses on the examination of contemporary conflict trends, drivers, and dynamics and how these differ from prior conflicts.

Type: Discussion Paper

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Israel-Hezbollah Contained Escalation Halts Concern Over Broader Mideast War

Israel-Hezbollah Contained Escalation Halts Concern Over Broader Mideast War

Thursday, August 29, 2024

For weeks, concerns over the risk of miscalculation or even intentional escalation between Israel and Hezbollah have dominated attention. Ramped up cross-border attacks between the two sides on Sunday, August 25 have left each side simultaneously claiming success “for now,” suggesting a much-feared larger conflagration may have been averted in the near term. However, implications for longer-term risk and mutual deterrence, Iran’s calculations for escalation, and linkage to the still-elusive Gaza cease-fire remain uncertain.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Western Sahara’s conflict is over. Negotiating the terms comes next.

Western Sahara’s conflict is over. Negotiating the terms comes next.

Wednesday, August 14, 2024

One of Africa’s longest wars shifted toward a conclusion in July when France recognized Morocco’s claim of sovereignty over the Western Sahara. That action, alongside Morocco’s military advantage, effectively will leave the indigenous Sahrawi independence movement with no choice but to eventually settle for some form of autonomy within Morocco. While this reality will be unsatisfactory for the estimated 173,000 Sahrawis living in refugee camps, their best option, and that of their backer, Algeria, is now to seize the opportunity to negotiate for best-possible peace terms with Morocco. Ending a war that keeps so many stateless and living in squalor while also removing a major irritant to the Moroccan-Algerian relationship will improve regional stability.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

View All Publications