With the diplomatic peace process between Israelis and Palestinians at a standstill and religiously motivated attacks on the rise, a delegation of senior religious leaders from the Council of Religious Institutions of the Holy Land (CRIHL) gathered at the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) on February 28 in a public demonstration of their intention to continue efforts to foster interfaith peace.

With the diplomatic peace process between Israelis and Palestinians at a standstill and religiously motivated attacks on the rise, a delegation of senior religious leaders from the Council of Religious Institutions of the Holy Land (CRIHL) gathered at the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) on February 28 in a public demonstration of their intention to continue efforts to foster interfaith peace.

“The very existence of this Council is remarkable,” noted David Smock, the senior vice president of the Religion and Peacemaking Center at USIP.

With its financial and moral support, the Institute was an early backer of interfaith dialogue that produced what is known as the Alexandria Declaration, a pledge by religious leaders from the Holy Land to work together to end violence and promote peace that was signed in Alexandria, Egypt, in 2002. CRIHL is the successor body to the Alexandria Declaration and the subsequent Alexandria Process

Canon Trond Bakkevig, CRIHL’s convener and a pastor of the Church of Norway, said, “We are promoting peace and a culture of peace…and aid all those who work for peace in the Holy Land.” Arguing that it is important to “say it again and again” that peace remains possible, Bakkevig said of CRIHL: “We have managed to stay together to keep the dialogue going thoughout all of this.”

Several members of the CRIHL delegation spoke at the USIP event:

Mahmoud Habbash. Peace “has to be based on a clear principle of justice, comprehensively, and everybody should get their rights,” said Habbash, the Palestinian minister of Waqf and religious affairs. He said that “no one can accept that peace can be achieved” if only one side of the conflict enjoys freedom, dignity, rights and privileges. And neither side, he added, can “build your life at the expense of others.” Habbash argued that even though “Israel was established at the expense of these [Palestinian] people,” both sides “have to move forward.” Said Habbash, “We have to give up concessions--a little bit--but don’t ask me to give up everything.” A peace settlement that called for restoring the borders of Palestine as they existed in 1967—an area far smaller than pre-Israel Palestine--would be “a very dear and painful price to pay” but one that Palestinians are prepared to accept, he said.

Yona Metzger. The Ashkenazi chief rabbi since 2003, Metzger said he believes there is a desire for peace among Palestinians. “I believe in peace,” he said. But the parties to the conflict must recognize that “peace is not only land. Peace is trust between people.” He condemned attacks on holy sites and places of worship, noting that he had visited a burned mosque in the Israeli city of Haifa and that such attacks are the “antithesis” of Jewish teaching. Metzger described himself as a “devotee” of personal, interfaith meetings, and he said his “hope and dream” is “the establishment of the United Nations for religion.”

Fouad Twal. Twal, the Latin patriarch of the Holy Land and Jordan, said that “as religious leaders, we can have influence on our faithful…to encourage the culture of peace.” He added, “We can prepare a new generation that can accept the other, dialogue [with] the other.” In the Holy Land, he said, “we cannot have peace for one people and not the other….I think we are condemned to live together.” All three of the Abrahamic faiths represented in the CRIHL delegation—Judaism, Christianity and Islam--teach that one should love God, one’s neighbors and even one’s enemies, Twal said. “Otherwise, we go on this cycle, this cycle of violence.”

Related Publications

Is a Saudi-Israel Normalization Agreement on the Horizon?

Is a Saudi-Israel Normalization Agreement on the Horizon?

Thursday, September 28, 2023

By: Lucy Kurtzer-Ellenbogen;  Ambassador Hesham Youssef;  Robert Barron;  Adam Gallagher

In recent months, a drumbeat has built around the U.S. effort to negotiate a normalization agreement between Israel and Saudi Arabia. The deal would be a tectonic shift in Middle East geopolitics, but also carries major implications for other actors beyond the three negotiating parties. Israel would, of course, benefit from normalized relations with the Saudis — long seen as the “holy grail” of potential normalization agreements for the country. The Saudis, in turn, would see their interests advanced through strengthened U.S partnership in key areas. But this deal could also have serious implications for the future of the Palestinian national movement and, further afield, for the role of China in the Middle East.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Peace Processes

How a Gaza Marine Deal Could Benefit Palestinians, Israelis and the Region

How a Gaza Marine Deal Could Benefit Palestinians, Israelis and the Region

Thursday, August 3, 2023

By: Ambassador Hesham Youssef

Amid today’s dismal Israeli-Palestinian context, positive developments have been in short supply. However, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s June announcement of preliminary approval for the development of the Gaza Marine gas fields provided a rare glimpse of a potential win-win opportunity. For the Palestinians, it could provide a much-needed boost to their lagging economy and the cash-strapped Palestinian Authority (PA). On the Israeli side, it allows the Netanyahu government to claim it is assisting in improving living conditions in Gaza and could lead to less U.S. pressure on issues like settlement expansion. In the big picture, this is another example of how energy is increasingly becoming a focus for potential win-win agreements in the East Mediterranean.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Economics

Is China Preparing to Make a Run at Israeli-Palestinian Peace?

Is China Preparing to Make a Run at Israeli-Palestinian Peace?

Thursday, June 22, 2023

By: Adam Gallagher

Since April of last year, Xi Jinping and China’s foreign policy apparatus have been touting the Chinese leader’s vision of an alternative to the U.S.-led global security order, dubbed the Global Security Initiative (GSI). While Beijing has incrementally elaborated on Xi’s GSI, it remains an inchoate, fuzzy concept. What is clear is that Beijing wants to be seen as a global force for peace and stability that is capable of resolving international issues that appeared intractable under the U.S.-led security order. And it has repeatedly pointed to the detente it brokered between longtime foes Iran and Saudi Arabia as an example of its peacemaking prowess. As China deepens its involvement in the Middle East and campaigns for the GSI, is it gearing up to take on one of the region’s most vexing challenges, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Global PolicyPeace Processes

Regional Actors Seek to Douse Flames Fueled by Jerusalem Tensions

Regional Actors Seek to Douse Flames Fueled by Jerusalem Tensions

Thursday, April 13, 2023

By: Lucy Kurtzer-Ellenbogen;  Ambassador Hesham Youssef

The saying that history doesn’t repeat, but rhymes is no truer than in Jerusalem. Two years have yet to pass since the large-scale escalation that took root in the city morphed into deadly violence between Arab and Jewish citizens of Israel and an Israel-Hamas military escalation that claimed the lives of over 200 Palestinians and 12 Israelis. Now, once again, events in and around Al-Aqsa Mosque during Ramadan have become proximate cause for a cascading series of violent events that have victimized Palestinians and Israelis, and opened another chapter of contested narratives and mutual recriminations.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications