USIP has been convening Asia-Pacific naval attaches in Washington to discuss the significant strategic shifts in that vital region, an effort to encourage dialogue that reflects the “rebalancing” of U.S. policy toward the Asia-Pacific.

USIP’s NAVARM Building Asia-Pacific Understanding
Photo Credit: New York Times

Since the death of Kim Jong-il and the ascension of his son, Kim Jong-un, as the leader of North Korea, events on the Korean Peninsula have ratcheted up tensions in the region significantly, albeit with an unpredictable ebb and flow. As the international community struggles to understand and deal with a young, intransigent and bellicose new leader, it employs the blunt instrument of increasing sanctions to try to compel the North Korean leader to acquiesce. But this strategy also carries with it risks of unintended consequences. Kim Jong-un’s demonstrated willingness to test nuclear weapons and launch advanced long-range missiles—while issuing state propaganda that proclaims aspirations to bomb the United States—have broken new ground, raising security concerns among the United States and its allies while alarming the Congress and the American people.

North Korea’s conduct may have drawn most of the public attention on Asia-Pacific security issues of late. But more broadly, the economic dynamism, political trends and advancing military capabilities in the region provide the context for a much broader and deeper shift in America’s posture: the rebalancing of U.S. foreign policy to the Asia-Pacific region, an approach first rolled out by the Obama administration in 2011.

So, it seemed only natural that the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) would move to take into account this national policy movement.  Sensing a lack of opportunities for foreign naval attaches stationed in Washington to regularly convene and discuss issues of critical importance to conflict prevention and mutual understanding, USIP chose to launch the NAVARM (Naval Attaché Roundtable Meetings) for Asia-Pacific naval attachés in November 2012.  Naval attaches join with U.S. policy-making, military, think tank and USIP experts to discuss topics of strategic regional importance and promote dialogue among Washington’s attaché corps. Hosting Asia-Pacific naval attachés at USIP helps advance U.S. Navy and interagency understanding of how these attachés interact on critical regional issues.  Those participating also learn about USIP’s analytical and programming capabilities.

On April 24, USIP hosted its third in a continuing series of NAVARMs. Naval attaches and members of several U.S. agencies were briefed by Ambassador Clifford A. Hart, Jr., the U.S. Special Envoy for the Six-Party Talks, on the topic “Korean Peninsula:  Challenges to Diplomacy.” Sifting through North Korean rhetoric and U.S. policy and political factors on North Korea, the NAVARM discussed the past patterns of North Korea-related security flare-ups, as well as the current trajectory of events on the peninsula and regional responses. The attendees had the opportunity to discuss this important topic in an intimate, non-attribution forum.

There will, no doubt, be much to discuss in the future, and the forum we’ve established can play a useful role in building better understanding and contacts for everyone involved.

Lieutenant Commander Aaron R. Austin came to the U.S. Institute of Peace as an interagency professional-in-residence in spring 2012 from the U.S. Navy (USN). He currently works as a Northeast Asia specialist and on projects related to the development of increased relations between the USN, USIP and the NGO community.

Explore Further


Related Publications

Increasing Information Access for the North Korean People

Increasing Information Access for the North Korean People

Monday, April 15, 2024

In recent years, North Korea has become more repressive, more impoverished and more allergic to the outside world. Already turning inward after the failure of diplomatic efforts in 2019, the North Korean government isolated itself further amid the global COVID-19 pandemic. North Korea has learned to operate, and Kim Jong Un has learned to rule, with greater levels of self-isolation than aggressive international sanctions regimes could ever hope to impose. Given North Korea’s current mode of rejecting even humanitarian assistance and its recent turn toward Russia, the chances for diplomatic breakthroughs with Pyongyang look like a wishful long-term hope at best.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

It’s Time to Resolve the Korean War

It’s Time to Resolve the Korean War

Monday, April 1, 2024

The greatest challenge to peaceful coexistence between North Korea and the United States is the technical state of war between the two countries. The United States and the Soviet Union may have been at ideological loggerheads, used proxies in regional conflicts and come close to direct superpower blows — but they were not in a state of war. Resolution of the Korean War should be set as a stated U.S. policy objective. This is a necessary Step Zero on the road to peaceful coexistence with North Korea today and could reduce the risk of deliberate or accidental conflict, nuclear or otherwise.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Three Conditions for Successful Engagement with North Korea

Three Conditions for Successful Engagement with North Korea

Monday, March 25, 2024

The September 13, 2023, meeting between Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un in Russia’s Amur Oblast marked a significant crippling of the decades-long U.S. pressure-based approach toward North Korea. The strategy of isolating and pressuring North Korea through United Nations Security Council resolutions to compel its nuclear disarmament in exchange for providing normalized relations, economic aid and sanctions relief may or may not ever have been a winning strategy, but now is no longer viable. The strategy required cooperation among the United States, South Korea, China and Russia, but this now seems a distant prospect.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Building Trust through Health Cooperation with North Korea

Building Trust through Health Cooperation with North Korea

Monday, March 18, 2024

The United States needs to address the existing trust deficit with North Korea if it wants to coexist peacefully with that country. Trust building through health cooperation may be the least contentious way politically and the most likely to succeed. However, engagement on health and humanitarian assistance with North Korea, like security negotiations, has been undermined by geopolitics.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

View All Publications