USIP Iraq expert Sean Kane takes a look at Iraq in 2010 and the formation of its second democratically elected government since the adoption of its Constitution in 2005.

As 2010 drew to a close, Iraq formed its second democratically elected government since the adoption of its Constitution in 2005. It was a year of change and transition, with the March 2010 national elections resulting in heavy turnover in the Iraqi Parliament and the U.S. ending more than seven years of combat operations in Iraq in August. The nine month government formation process dominated the year’s events, and while it highlighted the increasing primacy of politics as the means for settling disputes in Iraq, it also pointed toward the persistent divisions within Iraqi society.

Prime Minister Maliki’s new cabinet now has a full plate of issues which include defining Iraq’s regional and international relationships, key political matters such as power-sharing, national reconciliation and addressing Arab-Kurdish tensions, and improving upon the previous government’s record on employment, service delivery and corruption.

The conflict in Iraq is not over despite achievement of a new government and the maintenance of hard won security gains as the U.S. drew down to 50,000 troops. The U.S. role is transitioning from military-led to civilian-led with clear goals: an Iraq that is sovereign, stable, self-reliant and can contribute to peace and security in the region. In 2011, the United States and the new Iraqi government will be expected to focus on how a long-term strategic partnership across diplomatic, economic and cultural fields can contribute to this objective and what the nature of security cooperation will be between the two countries after the December 2011 deadline for the withdrawal of all U.S. forces from Iraq.

Please click on the links below for a summary of USIP’s operations in Iraq as well as features on key peacebuilding activities in which it is currently engaged.


Related Research & Analysis

What Does ‘Maximum Pressure’ on Iran Mean for Iraq?

What Does ‘Maximum Pressure’ on Iran Mean for Iraq?

Thursday, March 13, 2025

On March 8, the United States allowed a waiver to expire that had permitted Iraq to buy Iranian electricity. The move was the latest in the Trump administration’s “maximum pressure” campaign to cut off Iran’s revenue streams and push Tehran to negotiate over its controversial nuclear program. The waiver dates back to President Trump’s first term. In 2018, Trump withdrew the U.S. from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which had granted Iran sanctions relief in return for curbing its nuclear program and expanding cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog.

Type: Question and Answer

The Current Situation in Iraq

The Current Situation in Iraq

Monday, February 10, 2025

Iraq continues to recover from cycles of conflict that have displaced millions of people and caused widespread destruction. As the country rebuilds domestically and reintegrates into the region and the international community, it also needs to improve governance, diversify its economy and address water insecurity, among other challenges. Iraq also continues to grapple with the lasting human legacies of ISIS, including the reintegration of returnees from al-Hol camp in Northeast Syria and internally displaced persons.

Type: Fact Sheet

Stigmatization Experienced by Families with Perceived ISIS Affiliation in Anbar Province

Stigmatization Experienced by Families with Perceived ISIS Affiliation in Anbar Province

Wednesday, December 18, 2024

This discussion paper addresses the challenge of stigmatization faced by families in Iraq with perceived ISIS affiliation, particularly in Anbar province, where many have lived in the al-Hol camp. This stigma arises from community beliefs about their connection to ISIS through male relatives or past residence in ISIS-controlled areas. Stigmatization impacts these families' ability to reintegrate and includes harassment, rejection, property appropriation, and legal and social barriers. The paper includes key research findings and policy recommendations in response to these findings.

Type: Discussion Paper

How Assad’s Fall Could Impact Iraq

How Assad’s Fall Could Impact Iraq

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

The fall of President Bashar al-Assad earlier this month and what comes next in Syria will likely have significant security, political and other implications for Iraq. The situation is dynamic and could evolve in favor of Iraq’s stability or pose new challenges for the country. Iraq is one of a key group of actors — along with Iran, Turkey, the Gulf countries and the United States — whose actions could significantly impact Syria’s trajectory in the months ahead.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis