As part of USIP’s work with youth in conflict resolution and peacebuilding, and its efforts to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, USIP staff recently met with OneVoice Palestine and Israel youth leaders to learn more about their work on the ground.

As part of the United States Institute of Peace’s work with youth in conflict resolution and peacebuilding, and its efforts to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, USIP staff recently met with OneVoice Palestine and Israel youth leaders to learn more about their work on the ground.

 “In addition to the important analytical work we do at USIP, it is equally vital that in the context of our work on the Arab-Israeli conflict we familiarize ourselves and engage with the many groups and organizations working at the grassroots level and reaching the people who feel the effects of the conflict on a daily basis,” USIP Center for Mediation and Conflict Resolution’s Lucy Kurtzer-Ellenbogen said. “OneVoice is one such movement.”

OneVoice is a non-profit peace advocacy organization that trains youth leaders in conflict resolution in the Israeli and Palestinian communities. On Sept. 28, 2010, representatives from OneVoice Palestine (OVP) and OneVoice Israel (OVI) met with the Kurtzer-Ellenbogen, who works on the Arab-Israeli conflict, and Stephanie Schwartz from USIP’s Youth Working Group and author of “Youth in Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Agents of Change.” Although there is no formal partnership between USIP and One Voice, USIP recognizes the importance of meeting with youth groups like OneVoice to talk about peacemaking efforts in regions of conflict, like the Middle East.

 “It was great to meet with the OVI and OVP youth leaders to see how young people are hitting the ground running to build grassroots peace movements in their homelands,” said Schwartz. “It’s critical to the work of USIP to touch base with young social entrepreneurs, like the OneVoice Movement, to better understand what they believe, as leaders of the next generation, are the preeminent issues in the places they live, and learn about how they are creatively engaging in peacebuilding.”

USIP has met with OneVoice four times since April 2009. OneVoice was organized in 2002, and has been working as a grassroots organization in Israel and Palestine since 2004. OVI’s Danny Shaket, who works with mainly university groups, said OneVoice has campus chapters at all of the universities in Israel. These university sessions host discussions and debates about the key issues surrounding the Israel-Palestine conflict including access to holy sites and property rights.  OVP’s Ahmad Omeir told USIP staffers how OneVoice has been meeting with young Palestinian refugees and other Palestinian youth to discuss and build support for the two-state solution.

 “The model [OneVoice] employs through its youth leadership network– addressing the internal divisions within Israeli and Palestinian societies – is in keeping with USIP’s own approach to the conflict that attaches as much significance to the internal dynamics of Israeli and Palestinian societies as to the  relationship between the two sides,” said Kurtzer-Ellenbogen.

In 2010-2011, USIP is  examining these internal dynamics through its series of panels on "The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: Internal Challenges on the Road to Peace." Through these public events, and related publications, USIP explores the critical yet oft-neglected internal dynamics of this region: those issues that while, of domestic concern to Israelis or Palestinians, have implications for the broader conflict and for international efforts toward a peaceful resolution. It also seeks to promote debate and discussion around the impact of these issues on consensus-building among the Israeli and Palestinian publics toward a negotiated solution to the conflict

 

 

 


Related Publications

Iran’s Attack and the New Escalatory Cycle in the Middle East

Iran’s Attack and the New Escalatory Cycle in the Middle East

Tuesday, April 16, 2024

The Middle East is entering a new phase after unprecedented attacks by Israel and Iran during the first two weeks of April. Robin Wright, a senior fellow at USIP and the Woodrow Wilson Center who has covered the region for a half century, explores what happened, the strategic implications, the political context and the divided world reaction.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

The Growing Flashpoints Between the U.S. and Iran

The Growing Flashpoints Between the U.S. and Iran

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

Tension between Washington and Tehran has been a growing undercurrent of the war in Gaza, even as both countries tried to prevent it from sparking a direct confrontation during the first six months of fighting. Robin Wright, a joint fellow at USIP and the Wilson Center, explores the evolving flashpoints in the world’s most volatile region as well as the challenges for U.S. diplomacy, the new triggers for a wider regional conflagration and the historical backdrop.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

As Hezbollah-Israel Tensions Simmer, Lebanon’s Domestic Crises Drag On

As Hezbollah-Israel Tensions Simmer, Lebanon’s Domestic Crises Drag On

Monday, April 1, 2024

Nearly six months after Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel, tensions in two key flashpoints — Lebanon and Syria — continue to rise with significant Israeli airstrikes in both countries, leading to the highest death tolls in each country since October 7. Amid these rising tensions, ongoing clashes between the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) threaten to escalate into a wider war. At the same time, Lebanon continues to reel from a series of crises that have unfolded over the past four and a half years, highlighting Lebanon’s perilous position as the Gaza conflict continues to reverberate throughout the region.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

What Does the U.N. Cease-Fire Resolution Mean for the Israel-Gaza War?

What Does the U.N. Cease-Fire Resolution Mean for the Israel-Gaza War?

Tuesday, March 26, 2024

On March 25, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) passed Resolution 2728, calling for an “immediate” cease-fire in Gaza. The motion’s passage came after weeks of back and forth and posturing among the UNSC’s permanent and rotating members. The exact phrasing of the resolution and its relevance to the situation on the ground, as well as bilateral and multilateral relations — particularly U.S.-Israel ties — have been the subject of heavy public and media attention since Monday, raising questions about the resolution’s subtext, intent and limitations. USIP’s Robert Barron looks at these questions.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyPeace Processes

View All Publications