Peacebuilding programs too often can secure funding only for relatively short-term projects, even though successful efforts require a long-term commitment at all levels of society. Donors, too, increasingly emphasize sustainability and lasting impact. On November 10, the Conflict Prevention and Resolution Forum with Search for Common Ground hosted a forum at the U.S. Institute of Peace, where leading practitioners and scholars discussed how to achieve sustainability in a competitive funding environment.

LP
Pictured left to right, Craig Zelizer, Julia Roig, Theo Sitther, Lauren Van Metre, Ambassador Ken Yalowitz

The relatively short-term nature of funding provided by most donor organizations can be a major challenge to those in the field of peacebuilding, as pressure grows to create sustainable programs. In practice, there is little determination of exactly what constitutes sustainability or how to achieve it in a competitive funding environment.

The panelists focused on developing a long-term vision and approach to build sustainable programs and institutions. They discussed topics ranging from funding peacebuilding activities at the community level to working with private and public donors to maximize the impact of peacebuilding. Continue the conversation on Twitter with #CPRF.

Since 1999, the Conflict Prevention and Resolution Forum has provided a monthly platform in Washington for highlighting innovative and constructive methods of conflict resolution. The forum aims to (1) provide information from a wide variety of perspectives; (2) explore possible solutions to complex conflicts; and (3) provide a secure venue for stakeholders from various disciplines to engage in cross-sector and multi-track problem-solving. The forum is traditionally hosted at Johns Hopkins University’s Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) and is organized by the Conflict Management Program in conjunction with Search for Common Ground.

The forum is co-sponsored by a consortium of organizations that specialize in conflict resolution and/or public policy formulation: Search For Common Ground; the Alliance for Peacebuilding: American University’s International Peace and Conflict Resolution Program; George Mason University’s School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution; Georgetown University’s Conflict Resolution Program; Johns Hopkins University’s Nitze School of Advanced International Studies’ Conflict Management Program; Partners for Democratic Change; the United States Institute of Peace; and the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

Participants

Ambassador Ken Yalowitz
Director, Conflict Resolution Program, Georgetown University

Julia Roig
President, Partners Global (Formerly Partners for Democratic Change)

Lauren Van Metre
Acting Vice President, Applied Research on Conflict, USIP

Theo Sitther
Legislative Secretary for Peacebuilding Policy, Friends Committee on National Legislation

Craig Zelizer, Moderator
Associate Director, Conflict Resolution Program, Georgetown University

Jeff Helsing, Introductory Remarks
Acting Vice President, Academy for International Conflict Management and Peacebuilding, USIP

Related Publications

The Latest @ USIP: Preventing Conflict Over Critical Minerals

The Latest @ USIP: Preventing Conflict Over Critical Minerals

Tuesday, April 23, 2024

Critical minerals underpin the world economy, powering everything from batteries and computers to the global energy transition. But, as a new USIP senior study group report reveals, competition over securing critical mineral supply lines can also upend stability and security in developing countries. Ambassador Dave Miller, president of the U.S. Diplomatic Studies Foundation, discusses how peace games offer U.S. and international policymakers a chance to practice strategies for preventing conflict — a skillset that will only become more valuable as demand for critical minerals increases.

Type: Blog

EnvironmentEconomics

How ‘Traumatic Decarbonization’ Can Impact Political Stability and Peace

How ‘Traumatic Decarbonization’ Can Impact Political Stability and Peace

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

The process of decarbonization — that is, the replacement of fossil fuels with non-hydrocarbon-based forms of energy — is essential for the world to meet its climate goals. But in many fragile oil-producing states, hydrocarbon revenues are not just central to national economies. They also bind together the political system through elite revenue-sharing pacts. The rapid, unplanned decarbonization of these countries would spark political crisis, a process known as “traumatic decarbonization.”

Type: Question and Answer

EnvironmentFragility & Resilience

Critical Minerals in Africa: Strengthening Security, Supporting Development, and Reducing Conflict amid Geopolitical Competition

Critical Minerals in Africa: Strengthening Security, Supporting Development, and Reducing Conflict amid Geopolitical Competition

Tuesday, April 9, 2024

The United States Institute of Peace convened a senior study group to explore the role Africa plays in the United States’ efforts to diversify US critical mineral supply chains and how new investment in partnerships with African countries could help drive economic development and strengthen peace and security on the African continent. Based on meetings and interviews with relevant technical, operational, and policy experts, the study group developed multiple recommendations for the United States to support mutually beneficial public and private partnerships with African nations.

Type: Report

EconomicsEnvironmentGlobal Policy

View All Publications