Rebuilding economies after protracted chaos or violent conflict requires careful thought and political courage. By creating dynamic and inclusive growth, reconstruction zones could help countries stand on their own feet, consolidate peace, and overcome the unsustainable aid dependency to which they have grown accustomed. This event examined the validity of this approach, using Afghanistan and Pakistan as case studies.

Rebuilding economies after protracted chaos or violent conflict requires careful thought and political courage.  As outlined in a recent USIP Special Report, “business as usual is not an option.”  Poorly conceived strategies could be costly, counterproductive and unpopular.  Failure to address a complex array of issues, including infrastructure deficits, market failure, resource scarcity and human capacity constraints has compromised many economic reconstruction efforts and left many frustrated, disillusioned and vulnerable.

In her October 2011 USIP Special Report, Graciana del Castillo argues that reconstruction zones consisting of two distinct but synergistic areas (one focusing on local production and the other on exports) could provide an effective and integrated strategy for economic reconstruction.  In her view, using foreign assistance to support the provision of key infrastructure and services in these zones could jump-start productive sectors and create jobs and entrepreneurship in agriculture, light manufacturing, and services, both for domestic consumption and for exports.

By creating dynamic and inclusive growth, reconstruction zones could help countries stand on their own feet, consolidate peace, and overcome the unsustainable aid dependency to which they have grown accustomed.  This event examines the validity of this approach, using Afghanistan and Pakistan as case studies.

To accommodate for international audiences, this event will also be hosted online on the International Network for Economics and Conflict, a comprehensive website for practitioners of economic development working in fragile states.  You can watch the presentations and commentary online here and submit questions via chat on the event page or email.  Questions will be answered in real time by our panelists.

Speakers:

  • Graciana del Castillo, Presenter
    Author of "Rebuilding War-Torn States" (Oxford, 2008), former senior research scholar and adjunct professor of economics at Columbia University, and author of the USIP Special Reports The Economics of Peace and Reconstruction Zones in Afghanistan and Haiti
  • Roger B. Myerson, Discussant
    Glen A. Lloyd Distinguished Service Professor Department of Economics, University of Chicago and 2007 Nobel Prize winner in Economics
  • Shuja Nawaz, Discussant
    Director of the South Asia Center of the Atlantic Council and former Managing Editor of ‘Finance & Development’ (the multilingual quarterly of the IMF and the World Bank) and member of the Editorial Advisory Board of the World Bank Research Observer.
  • Raymond Gilpin, Moderator
    Director, Center for Sustainable Economies
    U.S. Institute of Peace

Explore Further

Related Publications

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Thursday, May 9, 2024

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant. Indeed, at the end of March, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of ISIS launched a devastating attack outside of Moscow, killing over 140 people.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyViolent Extremism

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

At midnight on the night of February 24-25, 2021, India and Pakistan reinstated a cease-fire that covered their security forces operating “along the Line of Control (LOC) and all other sectors” in Kashmir, the disputed territory that has been at the center of the India-Pakistan conflict since 1947. While the third anniversary of that agreement is a notable landmark in the history of India-Pakistan cease-fires, the 2021 cease-fire is fragile and needs bolstering to be maintained.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Days after Pakistan’s February 8 general election, the Election Commission of Pakistan released the official results confirming a major political upset. Contrary to what most political pundits and observers had predicted, independents aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) won the most seats at the national level, followed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). No party won an absolute majority needed to form a government on its own. The resultant uncertainty means the United States may have to contend with a government that is more focused on navigating internal politics and less so on addressing strategic challenges.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

Tamanna Salikuddin on Pakistan’s Elections

Tamanna Salikuddin on Pakistan’s Elections

Monday, February 12, 2024

Surprisingly, candidates aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan won the most seats in Pakistan’s elections. But while voters “have shown their faith in democracy,” the lack of a strong mandate for any specific leader or institution “doesn’t necessarily bode well for [Pakistan’s] stability,” says USIP’s Tamanna Salikuddin.

Type: Podcast

View All Publications