Effective and sustainable state-building requires a balanced application of all instruments of foreign assistance, particularly defense, diplomacy and development (the 3Ds).

Effective and sustainable state-building requires a balanced application of all instruments of foreign assistance, particularly defense, diplomacy and development (the 3Ds). Recent U.S.-led efforts to promote state-building in Iraq and Afghanistan have occasioned a gradual expansion of the military's role in non-kinetic activity, such as economic reform. This has raised concerns about "mission creep" in the military and a possible militarization of foreign assistance. Advocates of "smart power" call for a judicious use of the 3Ds. During her confirmation hearings in January 2009, Secretary of State Clinton promised a balanced approach that would use "the full range of tools at our disposal — diplomatic, economic, military, political, legal, and cultural — picking the right tool, or combination of tools, for each situation." Dr Reuben Brigety examined some implications of what has been described as the Defense Department's expanding role in U.S. foreign assistance in his March 18, 2009 testimony before the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the U.S. House of Representatives. He discussed challenges and opportunities created by the military's increasing non-kinetic opportunities and offered recommendations for a more balanced approach involving the USAID, the State Department and the Defense Department. This event will identify and explore practical measures that could better prepare relevant U.S. agencies for more productive state-building interventions. Lessons from operations in Iraq, the Balkans and parts of Africa will help illustrate and substantiate the panel's recommendations.

Speakers

  • Dr. Reuben Brigety II
    Director, Sustainable Security Program, Center for American Progress
  • Ambassador Charles P. Ries
    Former U.S. Minister for Economic Affairs and Coordinator for Economic Transition in Iraq
  • Colonel Thomas Dempsey (U.S. Army, retired)
    Professor of Security Sector Reform, U.S. Army Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute
  • Colonel Pedro Almeida (U.S. Army)
    Director, U.S. Africa Command Liaison Office
  • Dr. Raymond Gilpin, Moderator
    Associate Vice President, Sustainable Economies, U.S. Institute of Peace

Related Publications

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

When announcing the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in April 2021, President Joe Biden identified counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan as an enduring and critical US national security interest. This priority became even more pronounced after the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, the discovery of al-Qaeda’s leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul less than a year later, and the increasing threat of the Islamic State of Khorasan (ISIS-K) from Afghanistan. However, owing to the escalating pressures of strategic competition with China and Russia, counterterrorism has significantly dropped in importance in the policy agenda.

Type: Report

Violent Extremism

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Thursday, May 9, 2024

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant. Indeed, at the end of March, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of ISIS launched a devastating attack outside of Moscow, killing over 140 people.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyViolent Extremism

Despite Daunting Economic Headwinds, Afghan Private Sector Shows Signs of Life

Despite Daunting Economic Headwinds, Afghan Private Sector Shows Signs of Life

Thursday, May 2, 2024

Three years after the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, the country’s economy remains in a dismal state marked by depression-level price deflation, high unemployment and a collapse of GDP. Still, while the bad news for Afghans is well known, less visible are some green shoots in the country’s private sector that, if properly encouraged, could mitigate the situation. These range from small business activity to Taliban plans for major projects to the potential for an uptick in investment. Clearly nothing in those developments can stimulate a strong economic revival.

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications