Up an unpaved track, about a two-hour drive from the nearest town in the eastern Andes, sits a small village that could be mistaken for a Colombian hamlet of crude dwellings and vegetable gardens. But appearances aside, something extraordinary is going on here. The outpost’s population, comprised entirely of former guerrillas who fought for the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, the FARC, is engaged in an unplanned experiment in building peace.

A celebration in Bolivar Square of the signing of a peace agreement between the Colombian government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, in Bogota, Sept. 26, 2016. (Federico Rios Escobar/The New York Times)
A celebration in Bolivar Square of the signing of a peace agreement between the Colombian government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, in Bogota, Sept. 26, 2016. (Federico Rios Escobar/The New York Times)

The village, known as Simon Trinidad, is among a score or so of communities where FARC ex-combatants are collectively settling into new lives and economic activities, rather than pursuing individual reintegration under Colombia’s 2006 Social and Economic Reintegration Policy. In these communities, emerging on the sites of government demobilization camps after the 2016 peace agreement, the FARC is maintaining its structure and identity as it transitions from armed group to legal political party.

“If you live here you have to understand how we work as a community and join the effort,” Delia, a former FARC prisoner released under the peace deal, said during on a tour of the site. All residents of Simon Trinidad work together as a single cooperative, organized around production of organic fertilizers and food crops, and pig farming, she said. They also take courses to earn a high-school diploma and attend multiple workshops.

The peace accords signed by the FARC and the Colombian government provided for this novel approach to dealing with former fighters. Besides the customary individual process that has accompanied other disarmament, demobilization and reintegration efforts, the government agreed to support what is called collective, economic and social reincorporation.

Collective reincorporation under the peace deal contemplated that FARC communities might endure as social, political and economic units, but no one expected the transition zones to molt into towns. Whether these communities are sustainable remains to be seen. It can already be said, however, that Colombia’s pathbreaking collective reincorporation points to a possible post-conflict model for other countries where it’s viable and desirable.

From Transition Zones to Reincorporation Spaces

The distinctive collective focus started with 20 “transition zones” established under the accord in scattered rural areas as places for FARC members to live while demobilizing. The government provided basic construction materials to build camps with bedroom units, and communal bathrooms and kitchens. The former guerrillas (about 7,000 men and women) were expected to spend about 180 days at the sites.

Now called “Reincorporation Spaces,” the transition zones have acquired a semi-permanent status and become central to collective reincorporation, supported by government financing and assistance for productive projects. The peace accords called for support of “productive projects” initiated by ex-guerrillas, and the zones have become vital to transforming individual projects into a web of collective enterprises. The material and economic resources for the projects are administered by a FARC-run fund called ECOMUN, while the projects themselves are implemented through locally controlled cooperatives. Some zones feature a single cooperative with assorted productive arms, while others have set up separate coops specializing in activities that include food production, tourism, baking, tailoring and lodging services.

More than providing a spatial infrastructure for the implementation of productive projects, the zones offered incentives for the FARC to make peace and maintain it. They allow the FARC to put down its weapons while maintaining its party infrastructure and political enterprise. Local leaders of the zones are appointed by the FARC secretariat that also controls reintegration funds, letting leaders who bought into the peace process retain their status and influence. At the same time, the zones, situated in the home areas of the armed groups’ members, have become secure centers from which the FARC can peacefully spread its leftist political message as a legal party in regional and local elections in October.

Civilian Life

While the government has been unwilling or unable to protect individual rural activists following the peace agreement, the military has effectively secured the collective reincorporation zones. The zones also give the government insight on where the former guerrillas are and what they’re doing, facilitating monitoring of the reincorporation process. It remains to be seen whether the continuing presence of the FARC in areas it once controlled militarily helps fill a political vacuum that, experience shows, will otherwise draw disruptive and criminal elements.

Reliable security also supports a return to normal, civilian life for the ex-combatants. Although problems in the zones have led many to leave—two are shutting down after an exodus of residents—new people are arriving, transforming individual dorm rooms into family homes. As the Colombian peace commissioner’s team managing the zones put it, “The prospect of peace is correlated with a baby boom.” Indeed, the multitude of strollers parked in communal areas where ex-fighters organize businesses or attend lessons speaks loudly to their hopes for the future.

Still, the outlook for the zones remains murky. The two-year grace period set for these spaces by the peace agreement expires by the middle of this year. Given that the accord didn’t contemplate direct access to land ownership for demobilized FARC, the zones’ sustainability hinges on the government continuing to rent or buying the land and giving property rights to the FARC or its members—a process made difficult by the chaotic state of land titling in rural Colombia. Other challenges include the isolation of productive projects from markets, lack of capital for development and an uneasy balance of power between central and local FARC authorities.

The value of collective reincorporation, and the zones that support it, in resolving any particular conflict will depend, obviously, on local conditions. But Colombia’s novel experiment, whatever its future, has demonstrated that it can be one tool in the kit for demobilizing large insurgent groups with political agendas. It is something to consider for other nations seeking to push forward their own peace processes.

Maria Atuesta is a doctoral candidate at the Graduate School of Design at Harvard University and a USIP Jennings Randolph-Minerva Peace Scholar currently conducting fieldwork in Colombia.

Related Publications

Colombians Rally Online in New Movement for Peace

Colombians Rally Online in New Movement for Peace

Tuesday, July 30, 2019

By: Fred Strasser

It began with a few supporters of Colombia’s 2016 peace agreement meeting at a Bogota cultural center. That gathering, in January of this year, soon led to the creation of a WhatsApp group—a platform to discuss how to how to defend the interests of peace amid concerns about the policies of the new government. By mid-July, a spontaneous citizens movement of thousands of Colombian leaders was making its voice heard. Its objectives: to strengthen popular support for the previous government’s peace deal with the rebels of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and to support the peace process with the National Liberation Army (ELN).

Nonviolent Action; Peace Processes

Colombia Lawmakers Debate Peace Deal Challenges

Colombia Lawmakers Debate Peace Deal Challenges

Tuesday, May 14, 2019

By: Fred Strasser

The peace accord that halted a half-century of violent conflict in Colombia has reached a critical juncture. With the population almost evenly split over the terms of the 2016 agreement and a new government led by the party that opposed it, analysts and political figures see sustainable peace as increasingly endangered.

Peace Processes

Steve Hege on Colombia’s Election

Steve Hege on Colombia’s Election

Thursday, June 21, 2018

By: Steve Hege

Following a peaceful run-off election in Colombia, Steve Hege shares his analysis on the victory of right-wing candidate Ivan Duque over leftist Gustavo Petro. At the top of Duque’s agenda, according to Hege, will be amending the peace accord with the FARC, resuming more aggressive drug eradication programs, increasing security, and strengthening the U.S.-Colombia relationship.   

Episode 54 - Lili Cole and Diego Benitez

Episode 54 - Lili Cole and Diego Benitez

Wednesday, May 23, 2018


Our guests on today's episode are Diego Benitez, a Program Officer at USIP's Office of Learning, Evaluation and Research, and Lili Cole, an expert on reconciliation process and practice. We will be discussing a USIP project called IMPACT Colombia, which combines support for reconciliation projects in Colombia with USIP's own brand of monitoring and evaluation.


View All Publications