Despite a tumultuous year, one seemingly defined by devastating civil wars, violent extremism, and countries on the cusp of famine, U.S. Institute of Peace President Nancy Lindborg argues in a new video that “peace is very possible” in part due to the practical solutions that USIP’s teams work on every day.

Humanitarian emergencies in northeast Nigeria, Somalia, South Sudan, and Yemen, alongside a record 65.6 million people displaced by conflict, dominated news headlines this year. But USIP’s “top-down, bottom-up” approach to peacebuilding made meaningful progress towards peace in places as diverse as Colombia, Iraq, Nigeria and Pakistan.

By working from the “top-down,” USIP engages with politicians and influential civic and faith leaders to support inclusive political processes and responsive institutions in conflict zones around the world. In Nigeria, for example, USIP convened both powerful state governors and civil society members to address the crises that have helped fuel the Boko Haram insurgency.

If you can build peace in a place like Mahmoudiya, peace has a chance just about anywhere.

Rusty Barber, Director, Program & Development Operations

USIP complements that “top-down” work with “bottom-up” programs in communities on the front lines of conflict. As Iraq and its international allies reclaimed territory from the Islamic State, USIP was working with local leaders to restore peace and prevent cycles of revenge violence in areas affected by the terrorist group.

Those dialogues built on the lessons from a 2007 partnership with the U.S. Army’s 10th Mountain Division, which led to a peace accord in Mahmoudiya, Iraq, a dangerous region known among American soldiers as the “Triangle of Death.” This year, USIP marked the ten year anniversary of that peace agreement, and honored the soldiers of the 10th Mountain Division for their work in securing a peace that continues to hold to this day.

In Pakistan, USIP used its “bottom-up” approach to counter violent extremism at the local level: rehabilitating youth that had been radicalized as militants and terrorists. “The monitoring center that works on this [program] reports an almost 100 percent success rate,” explains Moeed Yusuf, associate vice president for USIP’s Asia Center.

We’re also seeing the rise of great power competition.

USIP President Nancy Lindborg

Together, these “top-down, bottom-up” initiatives yield constructive, cost-effective solutions to peacefully resolving crises abroad. The insights USIP gathers in these settings also serve to inform its efforts to provide training, analysis, and resources to people, organizations, and governments working to build peace.

Closer to home, USIP launched the Peace Trail on the National Mall, a new app “that highlights peace themes among our nation’s most iconic monuments and memorials,” according to Ann-Louise Colgan, USIP’s director of public education.

USIP also contributed to a smooth transition of power from the Obama administration to the Trump administration by once again hosting the landmark Passing the Baton conference to review the global challenges confronting our nation and advance informed, bipartisan problem-solving on threats to U.S. national interests.

As we enter 2018, Lindborg cites the rise of great power competition as one of those threats, noting that USIP “will remain agile and alert to all the ways that we can contribute to national security and a more peaceful world.” Watch the video above for a more complete summary of USIP’s work in 2017.

Related Publications

In Niger, Foreign Security Interests Undermine Stability—What Can Be Done?

In Niger, Foreign Security Interests Undermine Stability—What Can Be Done?

Wednesday, November 4, 2020

By: Emily Cole; Allison Grossman

Over the past decade, the United States, France, and the European Union (EU) have drastically increased security assistance to countries in the Sahel region. They have done so to address two perceived transnational threats—violent extremism and mass migration to Europe—but have often neglected Sahel countries’ own interests and long-term stability. Nowhere is this more apparent than in Niger, the world’s poorest country. Although in 2018 the country received $1.2 billion in external aid—representing 13 percent of its GDP—it has not made the country safer for Nigeriens. If long-term peace and stability is the end goal of foreign security assistance, donor countries need to center Nigeriens’ priorities in their aid.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Justice, Security & Rule of Law

Four Lessons for Security Sector Reform in Afghanistan

Four Lessons for Security Sector Reform in Afghanistan

Wednesday, October 21, 2020

By: Jason Criss Howk; Andrew Hyde; Annie Pforzheimer

As Afghan peace talks in Doha move forward, a vital component to the success of any peace deal will be how Afghanistan’s security sector can reform to sustain peace after more than 40 years of violence, and how the international community can best assist. This effort would benefit from recalling the lessons of another time when there was need for a comprehensive reconsideration of Afghanistan’s security sector: the two years immediately following the 2001 overthrow of the Taliban regime. Despite the many important changes, the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF) have undergone and a dramatically different context, key lessons from 2002-03 remain relevant to guide thinking ahead of and after a peace agreement.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Justice, Security & Rule of Law

How International Security Support Contributed to Mali’s Coup

How International Security Support Contributed to Mali’s Coup

Monday, September 21, 2020

By: Ena Dion; Emily Cole

Since a 2012 coup, Mali has received significant security assistance from United States, France, the European Union and other foreign donors to address violent extremism and insurgency and help stabilize the country. In the wake of the August military coup, it is clear that strategy has backfired—and that, in fact, the failure of international security sector assistance to prioritize governance likely contributed to the conditions that led to the coup.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Justice, Security & Rule of Law

Five Things to Know About Mali’s Coup

Five Things to Know About Mali’s Coup

Thursday, August 27, 2020

By: Emily Fornof; Emily Cole

On August 18, rising tensions to boiled over into a mutiny, leading to the resignation of President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita. This dramatic chain of events followed three months of protests, calling for Keita’s resignation. As the country grapples with an intractable insurgency and eight years of instability, anger over the government’s failure to resolve conflict, respect democratic norms, and provide basic services pushed citizens and the military to their boiling point. What comes next in Mali over the coming months could have significant implications for the country’s democracy and on the stability of the Sahel.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Justice, Security & Rule of Law; Democracy & Governance; Nonviolent Action

View All Publications