The joint press conference held by President Trump and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas after their meeting this week was spare of specifics, but abundant in atmospherics. Both leaders seemed intent on conveying the message that this is the start of a new chapter, and that peace—and the U.S.-Palestinian partnership toward that goal—is possible. 

Abbas and Trump
Photo Courtesy of The New York Times/Stephen Crowley

For Trump, this was an opportunity to underscore his seriousness of purpose in pursuing “the toughest deal to make.” For the aging Abbas, it was an effort to affirm his renewed relevance to domestic, global and regional players.

But if the meeting projected a sense of possibility, it offered no concrete next steps. There was no suggestion of renewed talks, and given the psychological and substantive gaps between the parties, this is prudent.

Instead, Trump noted that the U.S. can support efforts by the parties to reach a deal, and provided a thematic list of priorities: an enhanced  security partnership with the Palestinians, ongoing Israeli-Palestinian security coordination, a U.S. commitment to economic growth in the West Bank, and the fostering of an environment in which peace could thrive. These largely echo the areas of focus that emerged when former Secretary of State John Kerry took up the peace process in 2013, despite Trump’s efforts to distinguish himself from the previous administration. 

Yet to achieve an alternative outcome, the administration will need to tie these efforts to a clear endgame, and generate tangible improvements on the ground that suggest meaningful progress toward peace rather than cosmetic adjustments. On politically unpopular security cooperation with Israel, in particular, it will be important that the Palestinians see a benefit to their own security, rule of law, and economic development.

It will be similarly important that an economic focus not be seen as a substitute for a political process. The administration is off to a good start on this score, with Trump’s remarks seeming to emphasize that economic steps will be just part of the efforts to move toward peace.

The elephant in the room, of course, is Gaza, which got no direct play in the public remarks, despite the less-than-subtle efforts of its de facto ruling power, Hamas, to remind Palestinians, the U.S., and the international community of its relevance in the lead up to this meeting. Abbas aimed to speak yesterday for all Palestinians, but progress toward peace will elude the most robust efforts if the issue of Gaza’s growing humanitarian crisis and Hamas control are not addressed at the outset. This will require coordination not only with Abbas, but also with Israel and other regional players.

Trump, who said this week that he wants to prove the peace skeptics wrong, may have a chance to address this when he heads to Israel and Saudi Arabia later this month. Trump will need to show he can leverage the regional dynamics and reset relationships to produce incremental coordinated actions by all sides in a way that neither overpromises nor underwhelms.

Related Publications

Bill Taylor on the Escalation of Conflict in Ukraine

Bill Taylor on the Escalation of Conflict in Ukraine

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

By: William B. Taylor

Ambassador Taylor spoke to SiriusXM POTUS Ch. 124 about Ukraine’s efforts to upgrade its military with U.S. assistance to defend eastern Ukraine from Russian-led militias. Taylor also spoke about U.S. efforts to find a diplomatic solution to ease Russia’s withdrawal from Ukraine, the effect of U.S. and European sanctions on Putin, and the recognition of the U.S. National Defense and National Security Strategies that Russia is a top threat.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

As Vice President Pence Visits the Middle East, Hopes for Diplomacy Languish

As Vice President Pence Visits the Middle East, Hopes for Diplomacy Languish

Friday, January 19, 2018

By: Lucy Kurtzer-Ellenbogen

Vice President Mike Pence heads to Egypt, Jordan and Israel with little diplomatic quiet, and even less hope, on the Israeli-Palestinian front. President Abbas has declared the Oslo peace process dead, and the U.S. mediating role over, President Trump has broken with international consensus on Jerusalem, and pointedly not endorsed a two-state solution since coming to office, and Prime Minister Netanyahu has now hedged on his commitment to the end goal of a Palestinian state.

Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

A Diplomatic Window Opens, Briefly, on the Korean Peninsula

A Diplomatic Window Opens, Briefly, on the Korean Peninsula

Thursday, January 18, 2018

By: Frank Aum

Last week’s “sports diplomacy” between South and North Korean negotiators—the first direct dialogue in more than two years—was a good first step in reducing tensions on the Korean Peninsula. North Korea’s participation in next month’s Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, South Korea, along with news that the joint U.S.-South Korean military exercises will be delayed until late April, has produced a rare window of opportunity for diplomatic progress.

Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

Iraq’s Impasse with Kurds Puts Post-ISIS Stabilization at Risk

Iraq’s Impasse with Kurds Puts Post-ISIS Stabilization at Risk

Thursday, January 11, 2018

By: Andrew Snow

The impasse between Iraq’s central government and its Kurdistan Region is building into an economic problem, and both sides need to quickly find a way to negotiate a solution. While political conflict between the authorities in Baghdad and the regional capital of Erbil has been quieter since Iraqi troops ousted Kurdish forces from disputed territories in October, the Kurdish region’s economy is unraveling, with risks for both sides.

Economics & Environment; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue; Democracy & Governance

View All Publications