In light of the national security importance of India-Pakistan relations, USIP supports two Track-II dialogues on normalization between the two nuclear powers. On July 12, USIP convened a discussion with key participants from these dialogues and Congressional experts for a look ahead at outcomes to expect from reemerging official dialogue between India and Pakistan, and what these talks could mean for stability in South Asia.

 

As the Indian and Pakistani cricket teams met on the pitch in Mohali, India in March of this year, the presence of the Pakistani Prime Minister in the Indian Prime Minister's stadium box indicated that dialogue was reemerging between the two nuclear powers for the first time since the 2008 Mumbai attack.

Both sides have been candid in their admission that India-Pakistan normalization is critical to their interests and the manifestation of stable peace in the South Asian region. Despite this, little progress has been achieved in initial rounds of talks. Questions remain over whether this fresh impetus will last, and on what is required to ensure that the dialogue persists and leads to successful outcomes. Answers to these questions are crucial not only for the two parties involved but also for the U.S. interest to ensure stability in South Asia.

On July 12, USIP hosted a discussion of these central questions, led by a group of former senior officials and experts from both countries and the United States who, with the support of USIP's Pakistan program, participate in ongoing Track-II talks on regional normalization. Panelists discussed the major challenges to moving the India-Pakistan peace bid forward, and examine the potential of underexplored avenues, such as economic cooperation, as a vehicle for ameliorating tensions and bringing South Asia closer to sustainable peace.

Featuring:

  • Ambassador Shamshad Ahmad, panelist
    former Foreign Secretary
    Islamic Republic of Pakistan
  • Jonah Blank, moderator
    Policy Director for South Asia and Southeast Asia
    Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Majority Staff
  • Alexander Evans, moderator
    Henry Kissinger Chair in Foreign Policy and International Relations
    Library of Congress
  • Mohsin Khan, panelist
    Senior Fellow
    Petersen Institute for International Economics
  • Ambassador Dennis Kux, panelist
    Senior Policy Scholar
    Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars
  • Ambassador Lalit Mansingh, panelist
    former Foreign Secretary
    Republic of India
  • Congressman Jim McDermott, introductory remarks
    U.S. House of Representatives, Washington State's 7th District; and
    Founder, Congressional India and Indian-Americans Caucus
  • Michael Phelan, closing remarks
    Senior Professional Staff Member
    Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
  • Ambassador Teresita Schaffer, panelist
    Non-Resident Senior Fellow
    Brookings Institution
  • Inderjit Singh, panelist
    Professor of Economics and Strategic Studies
    National War College
  • William B. Taylor, remarks
    Senior Vice President, Center for Conflict Management
    United States Institute of Peace
  • Moeed Yusuf, remarks
    South Asia Adviser
    United States Institute of Peace

VIEW THE EVENT AGENDA

Explore Further

 Related Academy Courses

 

Related Publications

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

When announcing the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in April 2021, President Joe Biden identified counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan as an enduring and critical US national security interest. This priority became even more pronounced after the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, the discovery of al-Qaeda’s leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul less than a year later, and the increasing threat of the Islamic State of Khorasan (ISIS-K) from Afghanistan. However, owing to the escalating pressures of strategic competition with China and Russia, counterterrorism has significantly dropped in importance in the policy agenda.

Type: Report

Violent Extremism

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Thursday, May 9, 2024

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant. Indeed, at the end of March, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of ISIS launched a devastating attack outside of Moscow, killing over 140 people.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyViolent Extremism

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

At midnight on the night of February 24-25, 2021, India and Pakistan reinstated a cease-fire that covered their security forces operating “along the Line of Control (LOC) and all other sectors” in Kashmir, the disputed territory that has been at the center of the India-Pakistan conflict since 1947. While the third anniversary of that agreement is a notable landmark in the history of India-Pakistan cease-fires, the 2021 cease-fire is fragile and needs bolstering to be maintained.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Days after Pakistan’s February 8 general election, the Election Commission of Pakistan released the official results confirming a major political upset. Contrary to what most political pundits and observers had predicted, independents aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) won the most seats at the national level, followed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). No party won an absolute majority needed to form a government on its own. The resultant uncertainty means the United States may have to contend with a government that is more focused on navigating internal politics and less so on addressing strategic challenges.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

View All Publications