A conflict early warning and early response (EWER) ecosystem has been developing in West Africa as multilateral organizations, governments, civil society groups, and others have established systems that detect threats and provide critical information to relevant authorities. Yet individual EWER systems are prone to a range of failures—from gaps in data to decision-making bottlenecks to response coordination breakdowns. This report argues that linking individual systems—a network-of-networks approach—can improve outcomes for people across West Africa and serve as a model for other conflict-affected regions around the world.

Zenabou Coulibaly Zongo, consultant and founding member of the Council of Burkinabe Women, speaks at a mosque in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, on October 27, 2021. Her work attempts to address gaps in public health efforts, one of the challenges that have led to an increase in violent conflict. (Photo by Sophie Garcia/AP)
A consultant and founding member of the Council of Burkinabe Women speaks at a mosque in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, on October 27, 2021, to improve public health, an area where shortfalls may increase violent conflict. (Photo by Sophie Garcia/AP)

Summary

Most types of violent conflict in West Africa increased between 2016 and 2021, as economic and security challenges eroded public confidence in governance and groups competed for scarce resources. Data show increases in violent extremism, communal violence, political violence, and criminal violence; and trends indicate a further escalation over the next decade, with devastating humanitarian implications.

For at least 10 years, many institutions and organizations in West Africa have sought to head off these patterns of violence by establishing early warning and early response (EWER) systems at the regional, national, and local levels. These systems are intended to provide information on conflict risk to allow actors with a mandate and ability to respond to do so in a timely manner and prevent the escalation or spread of violence.

However, each system, no matter how sophisticated, eventually encounters the same points of failure: gaps in data and information on factors contributing to conflict, as well as problems around coordination, collaboration, and flow of critical information and analysis to those best positioned to respond.

Research has shown that a network-of-networks approach can help reduce the barriers to successful conflict management and prevention. Because conflict dynamics are so complex, no single EWER system can be flexible enough to reliably and effectively scale, adapt, and respond. But linking existing networks can significantly increase the impact of these systems. To provide evidence, examples of EWER systems operating at the regional, national, and local levels are detailed in this report. They demonstrate how a network-of-networks approach can help address some of the persistent shortcomings of existing EWER systems.

About the Report

This report examines the early warning and early response ecosystem in West Africa. It explores how existing systems track conflict risk for analysis and response planning, and where there might be opportunities to build on them and create deeper linkages and synergies. The research—supported by the United States Institute of Peace and carried out by the Fund for Peace—draws on data from eight early warning systems, extensive social network analysis, and interviews.

About the Authors

Nate Haken is the vice president for research and innovation at the Fund for Peace in Washington, DC. Patricia Taft Nasri is chief of party for Democracy International in Tunisia. Haken and Taft Nasri are the authors of Violence in Nigeria: Patterns and Trends, published by Springer in 2015. Nikita Reece, a PhD candidate at Universitat Jaume I, is a former research associate at the Fund for Peace.


Related Research & Analysis

What Do Changes in China’s Nuclear Program Mean for India?

What Do Changes in China’s Nuclear Program Mean for India?

Thursday, March 13, 2025

At the end of 2024, the annual U.S. Department of Defense report on military and security developments in China reinforced evolving assessments of China’s rapid nuclear expansion with an alarming projection: The U.S. expects China to have 1,000 nuclear warheads by 2030 despite having maintained a nuclear arsenal of approximately 300 warheads for decades.

Type: Analysis

Taiwan Stronger: Ramping Up Defense Resilience to Counter China

Taiwan Stronger: Ramping Up Defense Resilience to Counter China

Monday, March 10, 2025

The direct threat that China poses to Taiwan continues to rise and is far more severe and serious today than ever before. In addition to the increasing daily tempo of gray-zone coercion and armed provocations all around Taiwan, the specter of an outright attack or naval blockade by China looms larger than at any other time in the post-Cold War era.

Type: Analysis

Sectarian Violence Threatens Syria’s Shaky Transition

Sectarian Violence Threatens Syria’s Shaky Transition

Monday, March 10, 2025

Syria is witnessing the most significant sectarian violence since the fall of the Assad regime on December 8, 2024. Unverified estimates put the death toll over 1,000, with civilians comprising the vast majority of those killed. Clashes have largely been centered in Alawite strongholds along Syria’s Mediterranean coast, from the city of Tartus north to Latakia. The violence prompted large-scale protests in Damascus and other cities, while many anxious Alawite families have fled their homes along the coast. Syria’s interim president, Ahmed al-Shara, has called for “civil peace” and announced the launching of an independent committee to investigate the killings.

Type: Question and Answer

Xi Jinping’s Calculus of Cross-Strait Conflict

Xi Jinping’s Calculus of Cross-Strait Conflict

Wednesday, February 19, 2025

The strategic costs to China incurred by a comprehensive military campaign to compel unification with Taiwan likely are myriad and exorbitant. However, Taiwan’s prominent position in the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) core-interest hierarchy complicates assessments of the extent to which any cost drive the party’s decisions regarding use of force for unification. Beijing’s calculation of costs of action versus perceived cost of restraint is a foremost consideration in any Chinese use-of-force equation, and therefore critical in weighing U.S. options for deterring Chinese military action against Taiwan.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis