In a surprise move, the European Union on December 14 agreed to start accession talks with Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy described the news as “a victory of Ukraine … a victory that motivates, inspires and strengthens.”

From left: European Council President Charles Michel, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen attend a European Union-Ukraine Summit in Kyiv on February 3, 2023. (Emile Ducke/The New York Times)
From left: European Council President Charles Michel, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen attend a European Union-Ukraine Summit in Kyiv on February 3, 2023. (Emile Ducke/The New York Times)

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who is seen as close to Russian President Vladimir Putin, is vehemently opposed to EU membership for Ukraine. However, Orbán decided to walk out of the room when EU leaders voted on starting accession talks — effectively abstaining from the vote. Orbán later threatened to “slam the brakes” on the accession process. Hours after the accession process vote, Hungary blocked €50 billion in EU aid to Ukraine.

USIP’s Katie Ruppert discussed the significance of EU membership for Ukraine, and the way ahead.

What led the EU to vote in favor of accession talks for Ukraine?

Ruppert: The EU has supported Ukraine’s application for membership since June 2022 when it offered Ukraine (and Moldova) candidate status. The Ukrainians have been working since then to make the changes necessary to progress to the next step in the accession process. 

The EU requires that any prospective member state meet certain political and economic benchmarks to join. These are often extensive and require everything from strong democratic institutions to an independent judiciary to a competitive, vibrant financial system. In its recommendation, the EU cited significant progress on these benchmarks since 2014.

It’s really a testament to the Ukrainian government and the Ukrainian people that they were able to complete so many reforms at such a record pace. All but one EU member — Hungary — agreed on December 14 that Ukraine was ready to progress to the next step — actual negotiations leading to membership. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán had threatened to stop this decision, but the collective pressure of the other 26 members forced him to back down and allow the decision to go forward. This is a monumental step on Ukraine’s path to Europe and away from Russia.

What benefits will Ukraine get from EU membership?

Ruppert: Beyond the obvious economic and social benefits, EU membership locks Ukraine into Europe, forever precluding Russia from controlling Ukraine as Vladimir Putin is obsessed with doing. Ukraine belongs in Europe.

What are the next steps in the membership process? Is it smooth sailing from now on for Ukraine?

Ruppert: Accession is a yearslong process, but the Ukrainians are absolutely determined to get there — they say in two years. The European Commission’s report cited that Ukraine still needs to work on judicial reforms and strengthening its economy to better function within EU economic institutions, although the commission itself acknowledged that the latter is largely due to the conflict.

Are there implications for Ukraine’s NATO ambitions?

Ruppert: It definitely helps. Ukraine has just received formal approval from EU members that it is on the right path on reforms and that Brussels and member states want to welcome it fully into the European community. With the EU membership momentum, Ukraine is looking toward the NATO summit in Washington next July to receive an invitation to begin negotiations that would lead to NATO membership when the war ends.

There are different requirements for EU membership and NATO membership — one is more focused on political and economic and the other on military and security — but it’s definitely a boost for Ukraine’s Euro-Atlantic ambitions.


Related Publications

What’s Driving a Bigger BRICS and What Does it Mean for the U.S.?

What’s Driving a Bigger BRICS and What Does it Mean for the U.S.?

Thursday, October 17, 2024

Leaders from Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) will gather in Kazan, Russia, next week for the group’s annual summit, along with an expanded roster of members. This is the first BRICS summit since Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the UAE joined earlier this year. Russia, which holds the BRICS presidency this year, has also invited over two dozen other countries, which have expressed interest in joining the group, for the first “BRICS+” summit. For President Vladimir Putin, hosting this summit is an opportunity to show that Western efforts to isolate Moscow for its illegal war on Ukraine have not been successful and that Russia has friends around the globe.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

India’s BRICS Balancing Act

India’s BRICS Balancing Act

Thursday, October 17, 2024

Leaders of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) will meet in Kazan, Russia from October 22-24 for the 16th BRICS Summit. BRICS will welcome its five new members (Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates), with at least 24 other prospective members joining the summit. As BRICS expands and looks to become a more influential player in world affairs, India faces the increasingly complicated task of continuing to deepen ties with the United States and play a leading role in Russian- and Chinese-dominant global forums, like BRICS.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

Ambassador William Taylor on Ukraine’s Refusal to Cede Territory to Russia

Ambassador William Taylor on Ukraine’s Refusal to Cede Territory to Russia

Thursday, October 3, 2024

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s speech at the U.N. General Assembly made clear that Ukraine will not give up claims to territory. “Even if they don’t get [the land] all back right away, they will eventually get it back,” says USIP’s Ambassador William Taylor, which will leave Putin with “no choice but to look for a way out.”

Type: Podcast

Why Is the U.S. Deploying Long-Range Missiles in Germany?

Why Is the U.S. Deploying Long-Range Missiles in Germany?

Wednesday, August 21, 2024

On the sidelines of last month’s NATO summit, the United States and Germany announced that Washington will begin episodic deployments of long-range conventional capabilities to Germany. In 1987, the United States and Soviet Union agreed to eliminate these systems under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, but Russia’s violations led the United States to withdraw from the treaty in 2019. Three years later, Russia invaded Ukraine and has engaged in nuclear saber-rattling since then. Washington plans to deploy these systems to strengthen deterrence, but Moscow has criticized them.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications