Two days into Ukraine’s unfolding counteroffensive, a soldier just back from one of the first probes into Russian defensive lines called me on WhatsApp, giddy with excitement, to report his unit’s unexpected success. “We were told to push them back 600 meters,” he said, “but we got so little resistance, we pushed them back six kilometers! The Russians were soft!”

Protesters in Kyiv show portraits of Ukrainians, many civilians, seized by Russia in the war. As their army’s counteroffensive has begun, Ukrainians say their will to resist Russian rule has only grown over the war. (Brendan Hoffman/The New York Times)
Protesters in Kyiv show portraits of Ukrainians, many civilians, seized by Russia in the war. As their army’s counteroffensive has begun, Ukrainians say their will to resist Russian rule has only grown over the war. (Brendan Hoffman/The New York Times)

It is way too early to judge the success of the Ukrainian counteroffensive. The Russians have spent months hardening their defenses, so early days will be extraordinarily difficult for the Ukrainians. Last week’s destruction of the Kavkhovka dam will make it even more challenging. But the Ukrainian soldier’s high morale, after 15 months of brutal Russian assaults and atrocities, renewed a question central to this war: Why do the Ukrainians fight?

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other Ukrainian leaders for months have reminded the world of one reason: to make possible the kind of world we all want our children and grandchildren to live in — a rules-based order where powerful nations can’t get away with invading smaller nations. Ukrainians emphasize that they fight for principles embodied in the United Nations Charter — sovereignty and territorial integrity — and for freedom and democracy.

In recent visits to Ukraine with USIP colleagues, American officials, humanitarian assistance providers and others, I have heard a second, deeply visceral root of Ukrainians’ determination — even more powerful now than on the first day of Russia’s invasion. Ukrainians will not live under Russia.

In streets and at dining tables in Kyiv last month, visitors organized by the New York-based Renew Democracy Initiative heard Ukrainians describe a third reason for their fight that seems only to be consolidating under the 15 months of trauma in Ukraine and deepening dictatorship in Russia. That is their determination to obliterate from Ukraine the remnants and corruption of past and present Kremlin rule. Among those who emphasized it was Mustafa Nayyem, the Ukrainian former journalist who helped trigger the 2013 “Revolution of Dignity” that ousted Moscow-aligned President Viktor Yanukovych after he tried to block Ukrainians’ popular determination to move from Russia’s old, imperial sphere of dominance to Europe’s community of democracies. “We are fighting for a new Ukraine,” said Nayyem, now a senior official in charge of rebuilding Ukraine’s war-ravaged infrastructure.

The past 15 months have shown ever more vividly the contrast between a nightmarish subjugation to a corrupt Russian regime and the promises of democracy in league with Europe. “We are escaping our past,” Nayyem said.

The mayor of Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second-largest city, echoed that focus on escaping Kremlin corruption. In Washington last month, speaking in careful Ukrainian — no one speaks Russian in public anymore — Mayor Ihor Terekhov said Ukrainians are determined to apply a “wave of transparency and honesty” in shaping their future. Nayyem observed that after the victory, 1 million Ukrainian soldiers will reenter civilian life. They will have no tolerance for corruption.

Among Ukrainians we met in Kyiv, many are in their 30s and 40s. These are people who massed in the streets and squares, the “maidans,” of Ukrainian cities, in that 2013-2014 popular uprising to demand change. Like Nayyem, many of these people are now in Zelenskyy’s government. Former journalists, activists and students, they are now government officials, even ministers, absolutely committed to the new Ukraine.

Others of this generation are fighting on the front lines. A 44-year-old friend — who asked to be named only by his frontline call sign, Morgan — led a squad of protesters on the Maidan in 2014, then later became a senior provincial-level official. As the war approached, he joined the Kyiv territorial defense forces. On February 24, 2022, when the Russians invaded, he took his family to stay with his father in western Ukraine and returned to Kyiv to enlist in the regular army. He is now a lieutenant, fighting on the front lines. Three of us visiting Americans had dinner with him in Kyiv the day before he headed back to the front. “It’s going to be noisy!” he said. His sense of hope and optimism was palpable heading into Ukraine's counteroffensive.

In addition to ministers, generals and lieutenants, we talked to privates, young soldiers visiting from the front and heading back the next day. Among the Ukrainians were two Americans and two Belarusians. They were tired, yet eager to get back to their units. Morale is high.

Ukrainians are united as never before. Opinion polls show 90 percent-plus approval for President Zelenskyy and his refusal to compromise with the Russians. Ukrainian human rights organizations, democracy advocates, humanitarian service organizations, all make the case to Americans and Europeans for military support. Even opposition politicians — several of whom I met in Kyiv last month — support the president. They have concerns about wartime restrictions on media and some political activities, but they are 100 percent behind the president. After the victory, they will ask the hard questions. For now, they are fighting for a new Ukraine.


Related Publications

Why Is the U.S. Deploying Long-Range Missiles in Germany?

Why Is the U.S. Deploying Long-Range Missiles in Germany?

Wednesday, August 21, 2024

On the sidelines of last month’s NATO summit, the United States and Germany announced that Washington will begin episodic deployments of long-range conventional capabilities to Germany. In 1987, the United States and Soviet Union agreed to eliminate these systems under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, but Russia’s violations led the United States to withdraw from the treaty in 2019. Three years later, Russia invaded Ukraine and has engaged in nuclear saber-rattling since then. Washington plans to deploy these systems to strengthen deterrence, but Moscow has criticized them.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

Russia’s War and China’s Rise Set a New Path for South Korea-NATO Relations

Russia’s War and China’s Rise Set a New Path for South Korea-NATO Relations

Tuesday, August 20, 2024

July 2024 marked the third time South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol joined a NATO summit along with the leaders of the alliance’s other Indo-Pacific partner countries (Australia, Japan and New Zealand), informally known as the IP4. This represents a new phase in South Korea’s relations with the Atlantic alliance, but building a lasting friendship will take time and requires navigating a series of challenges. Amid an emerging global division of democratic and authoritarian camps and the challenges posed by China and Russia for both the Indo-Pacific and Euro-Atlantic regions, it is incumbent on both Brussels and Seoul to build a more cooperative relationship. That journey, however, has just begun.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Ukraine’s Pivot Changes the Narrative in Russia’s war; Outcome Remains Unclear

Ukraine’s Pivot Changes the Narrative in Russia’s war; Outcome Remains Unclear

Thursday, August 15, 2024

Almost 30 months into Vladimir Putin’s brutalization of Ukraine with a full-scale invasion that has pulverized vast swaths of its farmlands, towns and cities, Ukrainians have surprised Putin and the world by driving the war back into Russia — a move that, if nothing else, has altered the current narrative around this conflict. Ukraine has again brandished its determination, initiative and innovation, effectively resetting assumptions in its defense against its much larger attacker. The possible outcomes of Ukraine’s strike remain varied and unpredictable — and its eventual implications will rest on the evolutions of several questions, both military and political.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Donald Jensen on Ukraine’s Surprise Incursion into Russia

Donald Jensen on Ukraine’s Surprise Incursion into Russia

Monday, August 12, 2024

The Ukrainian military seized a chunk of territory in the Kursk region of Russia as part of a surprise incursion that has left the Russian military in “a panic,” says USIP’s Donald Jensen, adding that Putin’s strategy until now did not “take into account that Ukraine could strike back, and they certainly have.”

Type: Podcast

View All Publications