More women are participating in peace processes, but institutions still need to make sure that women’s roles are meaningful rather than just symbolic — and that requires looking far beyond reserving seats at the table during peace negotiations.

A scene from discussions on how women contribute to peace in their communities in Madura Island, Indonesia. October 7, 2017. (Ryan Brown/U.N. Women)
A scene from discussions on how women contribute to peace in their communities in Madura Island, Indonesia. October 7, 2017. (Ryan Brown/U.N. Women)

The peacebuilding field needs to elevate women’s diverse voices in decision-making, as their inclusion is a crucial boost for the likelihood of success. “When women are part of the peace process, [those peace outcomes] are 35 percent more likely to last beyond 15 years," said Liz Hume, the executive director of Alliance for Peacebuilding.

Speaking at a virtual event, Hume and other women practitioners and researchers from a range of generational and geographical backgrounds discussed equity and inclusion in the peacebuilding field.

One theme was constant over the course of the conversation: The status of women in a society indicates what challenges those women will face when that society is in conflict. “It is so important that, when we look at how to prevent conflict, we ask ‘Where are women in this context?’” said Dorothy Nyambi, the president and CEO of Mennonite Economic Development Associates. “If women have agency at all levels within societies ... the ability for us to prevent conflict has become higher.’”

The Importance of Cultural Context

However, perceptions of what constitutes women’s inclusion — as well as how to best facilitate it — vary across cultural contexts and even within cultures themselves. “Culture is also not a monolith … from organization culture, professional culture, and even what I would call generational culture,” said Esra Çuhadar, a senior expert on dialogue and peace processes for USIP.

Issue prioritization can vary greatly across these cultures. Therefore, recognizing intersectionality across cultural and generational perceptions is a key to understanding women’s existing roles in peacebuilding and peacemaking.

But for all the variance across cultures and generations, women peacebuilders do share some lived experiences — which makes standardizing women’s inclusion in peacebuilding through frameworks like the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda a useful baseline to work from if implementers are mindful of context-specific perspectives

These sort of systemic challenges and cultural perceptions can impact how communities view equity and inclusion, along with how success is defined in creating inclusive spaces. “It can be uncomfortable in the peacebuilding system, in Washington, D.C., in particular, to name ‘patriarchy’ as a system that is negatively impacting peacebuilding work ... and yet it is one,” said Shannon Paige, a policy associate at Peace Direct. “[Patriarchy] manifests differently in different contexts, which is where we have to have that cultural understanding, that ability to turn to local communities and say, ‘What does this look like for you?’”

Finding the Gaps

Peacebuilders and peacemakers in both the Global North and Global South face gaps between the proclaimed goals for women’s inclusion in the field and the steps that are being taken toward actualizing those goals.

Western organizations sometimes make the mistake of imposing perceptions of feminism on communities where the realities of women’s roles are quite different. “We defer to local leadership for how to reach communities … [but in some instances] we have failed to recognize what that looks like when these communities are different and may not value women’s leadership in the same way,” said Paige.

Sometimes, even once women are hired as co-facilitators in peacemaking processes, their colleagues hesitate to share resources or power. This stems in part from what Çuhadar calls an “identity threat.” Some groups perceive women’s involvement as a threat to their own social identity — that women’s inclusion is a Western idea being imposed on them, or that it’s a threat to the traditional family structure. Overturning systems that stifle women’s inclusion requires questioning the roots of this hesitancy, so that there might be cooperation between Global North and Global South systems.

It is not enough to get women involved, they must be supported and protected in their roles. “About 20 percent of women mentioned that they were threatened physically or did not feel safe,” said Çuhadar. “Protection of women peacebuilders on the ground is a real necessity.”

Surface-level symbolic inclusion can also prevent women from meaningfully engaging in peacebuilding spaces. “Sometimes, people in different organizations don’t act in a purely exclusive way … On the surface, they include women, but there are so many subtle non-inclusive ways that they are using,” said Çuhadar.

“Power analysis and conversations around power need to be put on the table,” added Nyambi. Power imbalances lead to the kind of surface-level, symbolic inclusion in the name of the WPS agenda that hinders women’s opportunities to contribute their knowledge and experience to peacebuilding processes.  

Empowerment cannot start with bringing women to the table for peacemaking negotiations — it needs to go back further. A lot of precursors to conflict and hindrances to women’s inclusion can also be traced to inequities, some of which are connected to climate change, economic challenges and gaps in educational access. “For women to have a voice and bring agency [to the peacebuilding field], they need to be economically empowered” as well, Nyambi explained.

Finding Solutions that Bridge Gaps and Cross Borders

Power-sharing is essential to women’s inclusion in conflict prevention as well as peacebuilding work, and this includes power-sharing across identities and borders. “Women on the ground in Ukraine, in Myanmar, understand their troubles,” said Nyambi. “Northern NGOs need to understand that in-country women and people understand their [own] context. They need power and agency to bring their perspectives to the table.”

Peacebuilding and peacemaking spaces cannot be considered truly inclusive until they are designed to meet the unique physical and circumstantial needs of women. This must not be conflated with a view of women’s exceptionalism that silos them to only working on “women’s issues.” Inclusion is an essential human need, and equity and inclusion need to be embedded at every step of the way in peace processes.

“Nothing changes a society faster than violence … In these social upheavals, gender roles change, and roles become less equal. This is a major challenge in our work,” said Kathleen Kuehnast, director of gender policy and strategy at USIP. Therefore, Kuehnast added, the question must continue to be asked: “How do we [as peacebuilders and in the peacebuilding field] incorporate the diverse perspectives and the diverse contributions of women into justice, diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility?”

Lyndi Tsering is a research analyst for USIP.

Related Publications

Colombian Civic Leader Offers a Grassroots Strategy for Peace

Colombian Civic Leader Offers a Grassroots Strategy for Peace

Friday, May 26, 2023

By: USIP Staff

Nine months into new efforts by Colombia’s administration to achieve “total peace” with remaining armed groups following decades of civil war, that process should make room for the nation’s thousands of grassroots and community organizations to strengthen peace locally when the fighting stops, says a prominent civic leader from one of the country’s most violent regions. Stabilizing Colombia, where migration toward the United States and other countries soared last year, will require steady support from U.S. and international partners, said Maria Eugenia Mosquera Riascos, who helps lead a Colombian network of 140 civic and community organizations working to end violence.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

GenderPeace Processes

The Latest @ USIP: Pakistani Police’s Gender Initiatives Expand Access to Justice

The Latest @ USIP: Pakistani Police’s Gender Initiatives Expand Access to Justice

Tuesday, May 23, 2023

By: Amna Baig

The Pakistani police’s gender protection units ensure that from start to finish, a victim’s case is handled by a staff of female and transgender officers — helping women and transgender victims overcome the cultural and gender barriers that often hamper their access to the justice system. Amna Baig, a Pakistani police superintendent and founder of Pakistan’s first gender protection unit, discusses how these programs work to prevent and counter gender-based violence, what’s needed to help replicate and expand them elsewhere, and how police can better integrate gender initiatives in their work more broadly.

Type: Blog

GenderJustice, Security & Rule of Law

U.N. Conference Highlights Global Unity but Limited Leverage Over the Taliban

U.N. Conference Highlights Global Unity but Limited Leverage Over the Taliban

Thursday, May 4, 2023

By: Belquis Ahmadi;  Kate Bateman;  Andrew Watkins;  Scott Worden

Over a year and a half since the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan, not a single country has recognized its government. Yet, it has resulted in no change in Taliban behavior. The worst predictions of what Taliban rule could be like have come true, as the regime has implemented unprecedented restrictions on women amid a brutal humanitarian crisis. The situation is so bad that U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres convened a special conference in Doha, Qatar this week — with no Taliban representation — to discuss Afghanistan’s international isolation. While there were no tangible outcomes — evidence of how limited the international community’s leverage really is — it did demonstrate remarkable consensus on the imperative to help the Afghan people.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

GenderGlobal PolicyHuman Rights

The Latest @ USIP: Women’s Inclusion and Transitional Justice in Ethiopia

The Latest @ USIP: Women’s Inclusion and Transitional Justice in Ethiopia

Monday, April 24, 2023

By: Filsan Abdi

During Ethiopia’s disastrous two-year civil conflict, women were subjected to countless acts of conflict-related sexual violence by security forces on both sides. Now that a peace process has begun, securing true transitional justice will require women’s participation and leadership throughout the negotiations. Filsan Abdi, founder director of the Horn Peace Institute, discusses her decision to resign from her prior position as Ethiopia’s minister of women, children and youth in protest of the violence, why women’s participation is so vital to the long-term success of peacebuilding and democracy in the Horn of Africa, and why the current peace process gives her hope despite its shortcomings.

Type: Blog

GenderPeace Processes

View All Publications