Ten months have passed since Myanmar’s military overthrew the country’s elected government, and by now it’s apparent that arrests, executions, torture and financial pressures will not pacify a population unwilling to be ruled by generals. So, the coup’s leader, Commander-in-Chief Min Aung Hlaing, is seeking to recast himself through military-controlled media. Rather than an autocrat who overturned the popular will, he portrays himself as the next in a long line of just and honorable Buddhist warrior-kings, monarchs who protected Buddhism from public apathy and external threats. The military is hoping that a barrage of religious propaganda can accomplish what force and violence have not. 

Buddhist monks protest the army coup of Myanmar in Mandalay, Feb. 27, 2021. However, monks have been less involved than they were in previous movements, such as the monk-led 2007 Saffron Revolution. (The New York Times)
Buddhist monks protest the army coup of Myanmar in Mandalay, Feb. 27, 2021. However, monks have been less involved than they were in previous movements, such as the monk-led 2007 Saffron Revolution. (The New York Times)

The challenge is steep. The generals assumed that their February 1 coup would meet limited resistance because of public frustration with the National League for Democracy-led government and because long-running religious and ethnic divisions would thwart attempts to organize an anti-coup movement. They were wrong on both counts. A forceful, resilient and effective resistance, cutting across religious and ethnic lines, has weakened the junta amid deepening hatred for the military. Even among its usual backers, the military appears to be losing support. In response, the generals have ramped up propaganda to depict themselves as the guardians of Buddhism as they seek to exacerbate fears of foreign and Muslim takeover.

Motivations behind the coup are complex and include economic interests and political aspirations, among other factors. Most of these motivations, though, are embedded within a narrative about the military, deeply held by its soldiers and civilian supporters and central to indoctrination at the Defense Services Academy. Today’s military, this myth holds, is the latest link in a legacy of military institutions in Myanmar — each led by a warrior-king — that defend the nation from the imminent threat of disintegration and commits itself to the protection of Buddhism.

Efforts to reinforce this critical narrative have intensified in recent months. News featuring public displays of military support for Buddhism have increased almost four-fold since the coup, according to a USIP analysis of the military-owned Myawaddy Daily and MRTV from August 2020 until November 2021.

Thus far, the propaganda blitz has had little discernible impact, though it may be helping the military stave off defections by its rank-and-file that could precipitate its collapse. Should these narratives gain traction with the public, however, they could undermine efforts to unify the opposition and spark inter-communal conflict. The military has had success generating fear about a Muslim takeover over the past decade, particularly among Buddhist communities in the Bamar heartland, where the anti-coup movement has had its most success recently.

The Military Attempts to Build Moral Capital and Rouse Latent Fear

The military has deployed four primary narratives to build its moral authority and generate fear that Burmese Buddhism and Myanmar’s sovereignty could crumble.

Narrative 1: The military is a pious institution with deep support from the Buddhist monastic community

Although the military has a history of violence against activist monks, and has arrested scores of non-compliant ones since the coup, it portrays itself as a pious institution with widespread support from within the Buddhist monastic community, the Sangha. USIP’s analysis found that Myawaddy Daily has run stories every day since February 1 that show military officers paying respect to Buddhist monks, visiting pagodas or making donations. Notably, the English-language section of the paper typically elides this imagery, offering an insight into the military’s domestic target audience.  

Narrative 2: The military protects and promotes the Buddhist practice and philosophy

In its effort to demonstrate that it protects the Sasana (a Sanskrit term for Buddhist practice and philosophy), the military regularly displays photos of its campaign to vaccinate and provide basic goods to members of the Sangha.

Monks Vaccines
Photos on military-owned news sites of the military donating basic goods and vaccines.]
Photos on military-owned news sites of the military donating basic goods and vaccines.

It also promotes a narrative that the Sasana is threatened by the National League for Democracy’s (NLD) apathy and that the democracy movement intends to destroy it. Just two weeks after the coup, the military publicized the re-opening of Buddhist sites closed due to COVID-19 under the Aung San Suu Kyi-led NLD government, demonstrating that the Sasana had supposedly declined under the NLD government while the generals were poised to rebuild it. The anti-coup movement, the military suggests, aims to destroy Buddhism. A recent op-ed in the Myawaddy Daily, for example, shows graphic photos of dead monks, alleging they were killed by the resistance movement.

Military-owned media shows re-opened Buddhist sites across Myanmar.
Military-owned media shows re-opened Buddhist sites across Myanmar.

Narrative 3: Min Aung Hlaing is a Buddhist warrior-king

Commander-in-Chief Min Aung Hlaing has undertaken two major construction projects to insert himself into the warrior-king lineage. He is building three enormous statues of such figures in the Kokang region of northern Shan State near the Chinese border. Notably, none of the memorialized warrior-kings managed to control the Kokang region, which Min Aung Hlaing did as regional commander in 2009. The statues aim to amplify the image of the Buddhist warrior-king, while subtly allowing the coup maker to associate himself with them.

Min Aung Hlaing is also building what he claims will be the largest seated Buddha statue in the world. The project began before the coup but perhaps with a military take-over in mind; Min Aung Hlaing had the first stone placed on January 30, 2021, just a day before the civilian government was overthrown. The statue was not widely publicized until March 2021, once it became clear that the public would not accept the coup regime. On March 28, the day after the worst massacre by soldiers since the coup, the military published an op-ed in the Myawaddy Daily about the interdependence of the Sasana and the military. The next day, another op-ed saluted Min Aung Hlaing for this project, saying “cultural heritages, including Pagodas and monuments have been built by magnificent religious kings. Today, Senior General Min Aung Hlaing and his followers are similarly building the world’s largest seated Buddha image to prove that Myanmar is a religious contry, where peace and prosperity flourish.”

Military-owned media shows re-opened Buddhist sites across Myanmar.
Military-owned media shows re-opened Buddhist sites across Myanmar.

Narrative 4: Myanmar is vulnerable to Muslim takeover

The military and its supporters also propagate the fabricated narrative of an imminent Muslim takeover and link the NLD and the anti-coup movement to Islam. Plugging into widely held Islamophobia nurtured for years by the military, the generals and their supporters spread narratives of Muslim influence on the NLD and the anti-coup movement, comparing the Peoples’ Defense Forces to the Taliban. Burma Monitor, a Myanmar-based civil society organization that tracks online hate speech and disinformation, catalogued numerous examples of this gambit, including doctored photos of prominent members of the shadow National Unity Government with full beards, one of them holding a large grenade.

More recently, the military junta’s spokesman, Zaw Min Tun, claimed that the army seized a cache of Turkish weapons that were delivered to anti-regime PDF fighters. To hammer the point home, he went on to say, “I assume that the OIC [Organization of Islamic Cooperation] is getting involved in the matter.”

The Military’s Weak Support Within the Sangha

The military’s success in spreading its narrative has been curbed by its limited base of support within the Sangha. Most notably, the highest Sangha body, the State Sangha Ma Ha Nayaka Committee (known as Ma Ha Na), issued a statement in March delicately indicating opposition to the coup regime’s State Administrative Council and signaling its intention to participate in the Civil Disobedience Movement. The statement capped numerous attempts by the chairman of Ma Ha Na, Banmaw Sayadaw, to discourage Min Aung Hlaing from launching the coup and engaging in violence. Ma Ha Na’s defiance was a startling departure from precedent and likely a major blow to military morale. After the statement, only three of the body’s 47 members body expressed public support for the SAC. Ma Ha Na has not made public remarks since, though Min Aung Hlaing met with Banmaw Sayadaw in early November.  

 

Coup leader Min Aung Hlaing meets with Buddhist leader Banmaw Sayadaw in November. (Office of the Commander-in-Chief of Myanmar’s Defense Services.)
Coup leader Min Aung Hlaing meets with Buddhist leader Banmaw Sayadaw in November. (Office of the Commander-in-Chief of Myanmar’s Defense Services.)

It is difficult to determine if the extravagant donation ceremonies and monastery visits indicate support from the monks or caution about rebuffing a murderous general. But the military does retain a few vocal allies within the Sangha. The most prominent is Sitagu Sayadaw, who even traveled with Deputy Commander-in-Chief Soe Win to Russia to observe an arms deal and military competition. For many years, he has offered religious justification for even the most heinous acts, including the Rohingya genocide, and remains the military’s most important monastic ally. Notably, even Sitagu Sayadaw, a member of the powerful Shwe Kyin Sangha Order, signed a letter from the Shwe Kyin executive committee in March asking Min Aung Hlaing to refrain from violence.

While the military has found limited support within the Sangha, Buddhists and other religious leaders have contributed relatively little backing to the anti-coup movement. In an address to military families soon after the putsch, Min Aung Hlaing highlighted how few monks had joined the protests, and he wasn’t completely wrong. Other than the courageous daily protests by the Mandalay Sangha Union, monks have been less involved than they were in previous movements, such as the monk-led 2007 Saffron Revolution. The reasons for the Sangha’s inaction are unclear, though there are indications that some members of the Sangha developed deeper connections with military affiliates over the past 10 years, making it more difficult for them to speak out. There are some signs that their absence has weakened the moral authority of the Sangha.

Religious Actors Can Help Build Peace and Unity

Religious figures could still be transformative in the months ahead in two major ways.

As the military scrambles to assert itself as the protector of the Sasana, the Sangha could more actively to combat that narrative. Either by refusing military visits or openly supporting the anti-coup movement, efforts that undermine the military’s moral authority could weaken the regime and precipitate more defections, desertion or non-compliance from rank-and-file soldiers.

The anti-coup movement has brought the military to a historically weak position, politically and militarily. Revealing its desperation and strained resources, the military has even begun to arm and train the children and the wives of its soldiers. Nonetheless, the anti-coup movement has not fully unified. It is composed of a dizzying array of actors, many with competing interests and deep mutual distrust. Religious leaders, including Christians, Hindus and Muslims, could play an important role in facilitating dialogue and, eventually, pursuing reconciliation within the anti-coup movement that could establish a foundation for sustainable peace in Myanmar.

Zarchi Oo is a technical specialist for intercommunal harmony in Myanmar at the U.S. Institute of Peace.

Related Publications

Three Priorities for U.S.-Thailand Cooperation in Myanmar

Three Priorities for U.S.-Thailand Cooperation in Myanmar

Wednesday, December 15, 2021

By: Brian Harding;  Jason Tower

Secretary of State Antony Blinken was forced to cut short his first trip to Southeast Asia this week, scrapping plans to meet with Thai officials due to COVID-19 concerns. That talks with Thailand, specifically, were put on hold is an unfortunate development. Because while Blinken’s agenda for the trip was wide-ranging, the crisis in Myanmar was at the top of his list. And with a nearly 1500-mile border and close ties with Myanmar’s military junta, Thailand has the greatest stake in Myanmar’s future among ASEAN countries. As the world discusses a strategy for addressing the crisis in Myanmar, Thailand’s potential influence — especially with respect to humanitarian access — could prove consequential. 

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Fragility & ResilienceGlobal Health

Myanmar Struggles to Reverse a Coup; Democracies Can Help

Myanmar Struggles to Reverse a Coup; Democracies Can Help

Thursday, December 9, 2021

By: Billy Ford;  Jason Tower

Few countries this year dramatize more powerfully the need for a global focus on strengthening democracy than Myanmar, now 10 months into a new chapter of military dictatorship and violence following its February 1 coup. Myanmar is a testament to the vulnerability of democracy when armed forces expect no repercussions for brutality and can rely on support from authoritarian governments which will arm, legitimize and finance them. As the United States and partners seek ways to boost democracy in this week’s White House summit, experts on Myanmar offered recommendations for policy.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Civilian-Military RelationsDemocracy & Governance

Myanmar’s Ongoing War Against Women

Myanmar’s Ongoing War Against Women

Tuesday, November 30, 2021

By: Kathleen Kuehnast, Ph.D.;  Gabriela Sagun

When the United Nations began its annual campaign to end violence against women 30 years ago, no one had Myanmar on their radar. But in recent years, Myanmar’s military has escalated its use of sexual and gender-based violence to terrorize women and girls — most infamously against ethnic minorities, notably the Rohingya. Confronted by these atrocities, the international community has issued widespread demands for accountability and justice that have yet to come to fruition.  

Type: Analysis and Commentary

GenderHuman Rights

View All Publications