Over 35 million Ukrainians are eligible to choose their next president on March 31. However, several million voters in Russia-annexed Crimea and rebel-held parts of east Ukraine will not be able to vote, demonstrating how the conflict with Moscow looms large over these elections. Of the 44 candidates registered by the Central Election Commission (CEC), incumbent President Petro Poroshenko, former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko and comedian Volodymr Zelensky are the top contenders. If no candidate secures 50 percent of the vote, a run-off will take place on April 21. USIP’s Ambassador Bill Taylor and Jonas Claes look at the risk of election violence and how Russia has interfered in Ukraine’s electoral process.

Waving their country's flag, pro-Ukrainians rally for a march in Donetsk, Ukraine, April 28, 2014. (Sergey Ponomarev/The New York Times)
Waving their country's flag, pro-Ukrainians rally for a march in Donetsk, Ukraine, April 28, 2014. (Sergey Ponomarev/The New York Times)

A recent USIP Special Report on Ukraine’s 2019 elections finds that while the risk of widespread election violence is low, intimidation, cyberattacks and post-election violence are likely to occur. With the vote just days away, how would you assess the risk of election violence now? Have there been any major incidents?

Claes: Fortunately, there have not been any major incidents or reports of widespread pre-election violence, preliminarily confirming the findings from our report. However, we will receive a more complete picture once reports from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe’s (OSCE) Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, OPORA and other election observation missions come through next week, but so far violence levels have remained low.

Preliminary reports did note sporadic and localized attacks against election observers and campaign materials, and denial-of-service cyberattacks on the CEC. Attacks against journalists, minority groups, and civic activists that human rights groups have reported for years have also persisted through the campaign period, negatively impacting participation of vulnerable groups in the electoral process.

The majority of the intimidation and violence against the Roma and other minority groups is perpetrated by far-right nationalist groups. These groups, which have a degree of public support for their patriotism in the war against Russia-backed forces in the Donbas, have continued to make their intimidating presence felt throughout the campaign period. One group, the National Militia, has even been registered by the CEC to formally observe the elections.

In the early months of the campaign period the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission observed an increase in the number of cease-fire violations in the Donbas region. While this violence has been linked to the presidential race, there has not been a major escalation of the conflict between Ukraine and Russia-backed forces.

Observers will carefully look at how Election Day unfolds. Post-election violence remains a concern, particularly if the leading candidates and their supporters do not accept the result if they do not make it to the run-off. The violence that has occurred to date has not drastically shaped the election process, so Ukraine remains on route to a close and competitive, yet stable election process.

What are expectations for the credibility of these polls?

Claes: The competitive nature of the election, with several candidates contesting a close race, is a good sign. The political and economic environment is less challenging compared to the 2014 early presidential elections that immediately followed the “Revolution of Dignity” (also known as Euromaidan). However, let’s not forget that an estimated 12 percent of the population will not be able to vote on Sunday because of the occupation of Crimea and the conflict in the Donbas.

Ukraine’s electoral institutions have the necessary capacity and professionalism to organize peaceful and credible elections, but voters in Ukraine have little trust in government institutions and the CEC. Most election commissioners were only appointed a little over six months ago, and as such have had little time to prepare for the elections and gain much-needed trust from the voters.

Preliminary reports indicated widespread vote-buying efforts, as candidates use all means at their disposal to tip the balance into their favor. There have also been challenges related to the high number of candidates and registered observer groups. Looking ahead to the parliamentary elections in October and local elections in 2020, incremental reforms will be needed to ensure greater inclusion of internally displaced people, a functioning framework for local elections, and a stronger enforcement mechanism to counter electoral offenses.

Another finding from the USIP report suggested that Russia was likely to interfere in the elections. How has Moscow sought to influence this election and sow discord in Ukraine in the lead up to the vote?

Taylor: Russia continues to try to destabilize Ukraine. The Russian invasion of Crimea and the Donbas, attacks on Ukrainian navy vessels in the Black Sea, and its holding 24 sailors as prisoners of war, all serve to keep Ukrainians from the hard work of reform and democracy—including elections. All those actions have turned Ukrainians against Russia. A significant portion of the Ukrainian people used to support good relations with Russia. No more.

All leading candidates running for president oppose Russian aggression and support closer ties with Europe and the United States. In response to a long history of Russian interference in U.S., Brexit and other European elections, the Ukrainian government has taken extraordinary measures to deter and counter expected Russian cyberattacks and interference in its presidential elections on social media.

If these measures prove effective, other nations, including the United States, will want to learn from the Ukrainian experience.


Related Research & Analysis

Can India Advance Peace in Ukraine?

Can India Advance Peace in Ukraine?

Tuesday, January 14, 2025

Since the start of Russia’s war in Ukraine, India has worked to protect its strategic relationship with Russia while maintaining its burgeoning ties with the United States and Europe. India’s balancing act was on display earlier this year when Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Russia in July and made a historic trip to Ukraine the following month. Modi has portrayed a neutral stance on the Ukraine war and positioned India as a key player in any potential peace process.

Type: Question and Answer

Donald Jensen on the War in Ukraine’s Trajectory

Donald Jensen on the War in Ukraine’s Trajectory

Friday, January 3, 2025

As Ukraine considers the “politically loaded” question of whether to lower the age of military mobilization, Putin increasingly sees the war “not just as a land grab, but as a civilizational battle between Russia and the West,” says USIP’s Donald Jensen, adding: “We should not think that the war is anything close to being settled.”

Type: Podcast

Ukraine: The Inflection Point in the China-Russia Axis

Ukraine: The Inflection Point in the China-Russia Axis

Thursday, December 19, 2024

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has catalyzed a profound shift in global power dynamics: the deepening of the partnership between China and Russia. This relationship, while rooted in history, represents a significant departure from previous patterns of cooperation. China-Russia ties have evolved from a transactional relationship of convenience to a more durable strategic alignment, while continuing to fall short of a full-blown military alliance. This development challenges traditional Western assumptions about the limits of authoritarian cooperation and may signal the emergence of a new model of international partnership.

Type: Analysis

Protecting Water Infrastructure During War

Protecting Water Infrastructure During War

Friday, December 6, 2024

The weaponization of water resources is among the most devastating tools used in violent conflict. And while this tactic has been pervasive throughout history, it’s on the rise. State and non-state actors across the globe are increasingly exploiting the capture, control and outright destruction of water resources and related infrastructure to inflict indiscriminate human suffering and further their own strategic and military aims. To put this devastating trend into historical context: Out of all the recorded incidents targeting water infrastructure over the last 2,000 years, 41 percent have occurred since 2020.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis