A failure by the international community to help rebuild Iraq will leave a vacuum that Russia, Iran or some new extremist group will seek to fill, warned the co-chairman of a working group in the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS. In a recent discussion at the U.S. Institute of Peace, Ekkehard Brose agreed with the top U.S. State Department official on Iraq, Joseph Pennington, that Iraq must ultimately solve its own problems. But at this point, it can’t, Brose said.

Soldiers pick their way through the ruins of Mosul, Iraq, July 11, 2017. Though Iraq officially declared victory over the Islamic State in Mosul on Sunday, a day later artillery fire could be heard in pockets of the city.
Soldiers pick their way through the ruins of Mosul, Iraq, July 11, 2017. Photo Courtesy of The New York Times/Rukmini Callimachi

Only long-term international support will enable the economic and political reforms needed to recover from the damage inflicted by ISIS and the fight against the extremist group, said Brose, a former German ambassador to Iraq who is co-chair of the coalition’s stabilization working group. Pennington, the U.S. deputy assistant secretary of state for Iraq, also serves on the working group.

The 72-nation coalition, led by the U.S., has built support for the Iraqi government through its military campaign and early efforts at stabilization, Brose said in the July 14 discussion at USIP. The event followed coalition meetings in Washington earlier in the week.

“These achievements shouldn’t be endangered by letting Iraq fall into the abyss after it’s been stabilized,” he said.

The three days of coalition meetings in Washington coincided with Iraq’s declaration of victory over ISIS in Mosul, the country’s second-largest city. Coalition members discussed ways to increase the pressure on ISIS in Iraq, Syria and elsewhere around the globe, including by stemming the flow of foreign fighters and disrupting terrorism financing. The sessions also focused on how to improve living conditions enough in recaptured areas for people displaced by the violence to go home.

“How we think about stabilization and what we do collectively as a global community about stabilization will absolutely set the stage for Iraq’s future,” USIP President Nancy Lindborg said in introducing the event.

Just the Basics? Or More?

Stabilization sometimes refers to re-establishing the basics—clearing rubble, restoring electricity, re-establishing markets for food, and reopening schools and hospitals. Others advocate for longer-term assistance to sustain progress, including steps such as bolstering a country’s economy, ensuring economic and political reforms and guiding reconciliation.

Brose and Pennington concurred that rebuilding Iraq will be impossible without investment by the private sector. The estimated cost of reconstruction ranges from $50 billion to $100 billion, an amount no individual nation—or even the entire coalition—realistically will provide in foreign aid, Pennington said.

At the same time, international companies won’t operate in Iraq without economic and legal reforms as well as improved security, Pennington and Brose said. Curbing the country’s pervasive corruption is crucial for attracting foreign investment, they agreed. Brose remarked that, as ambassador, he received frequent complaints from German companies of shakedowns and broken contracts, and he said Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi told him in May that the country’s two most dangerous enemies were ISIS and corruption.

The need to decentralize governance in fractious Iraq, to put decision-making closer to its people, is another key to stability and reconstruction, said Pennington. The U.S. Agency for International Development has contributed significant resources and technical assistance to get the reform underway, he said. Brose said al-Abadi told him “this country doesn’t like decentralization, but we are going to continue.”

No 'Blueprint for Iraq'

The U.S. this month agreed to provide $150 million more for stabilization work administered by the United Nations Development Program and an additional $119 million for humanitarian assistance for the approximately 3 million internally displaced people in Iraq.

The U.S. will remain engaged and prepared to be helpful where possible in mediating among political factions or offering technical advice, but there will be no “blueprint for Iraq” coming out of Washington, Pennington said. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson made clear to the coalition in March that the U.S. “is not returning to a nation-building mode,” he said.

“This is not only because we don’t have the bandwidth and capacity, but also because of lessons learned in the past,” Pennington said. “There’s an Iraqi set of issues that requires Iraqis to sort out.”

The U.S. government’s resistance to assisting with reconstruction beyond immediate needs “would be irresponsible” and possibly dangerous, Brose said. The U.S.  bears heavy responsibility for what has happened in Iraq since 2003, and only basic stabilization without fuller reconstruction will not be sustainable, he said.

If better conditions aren’t established, the resulting vacuum, he said, will generate ominous consequences: a return of ISIS, growing Iranian influence or perhaps a turn to Russia.

“If you like any of those options, don’t do reconstruction,” he said.

Related Publications

How Can U.S. Better Help Tunisia to Curb ISIS Recruitment?

How Can U.S. Better Help Tunisia to Curb ISIS Recruitment?

Tuesday, February 20, 2018

By: USIP Staff

As Tunisia last month celebrated the 2011 overthrow of its dictatorship, thousands of young Tunisians protested in streets nationwide, often clashing with police. Young Tunisians widely voice an angry despair at being unemployed, untrained for jobs, and unable to build futures for themselves. The single democracy to have arisen from the Arab Spring uprisings is undermined by the feelings of hopelessness among many youth, and by their exploitation by extremist groups linked to ISIS and al-Qaida. To help Tunisian, U.S. and other efforts to build hope for Tunisia’s youth, a small, USIP-funded project is measuring which kinds of programs are actually effective.

Violent Extremism; Youth

South Sudan’s Pitfalls of Power Sharing

South Sudan’s Pitfalls of Power Sharing

Friday, February 16, 2018

By: USIP Staff; Susan Stigant; Aly Verjee

This week, a new proposal for a power sharing government was tabled at the ongoing Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) High Level Revitalization Forum (HLRF) peace talks for South Sudan. An earlier, 2015 peace deal also contained a formula for power sharing; that arrangement failed and the civil war re-ignited a year later. Power sharing arrangements are appropriate if certain conditions are met, but not enough has been done to ensure the latest proposal will overcome the obstacles present in South Sudan, according to Susan Stigant, USIP’s director for Africa programs and Aly Verjee, a visiting expert at USIP and a former senior advisor to the IGAD mediation, who comment on the proposal and suggest how it could be improved.

Democracy & Governance; Fragility and Resilience; Global Policy

To Stabilize Iraq After ISIS, Help Iraqis Reconcile

To Stabilize Iraq After ISIS, Help Iraqis Reconcile

Sunday, February 11, 2018

By: USIP Staff; Nancy Lindborg; Sarhang Hamasaeed

An international conference opens in Kuwait Monday to plan ways to rebuild Iraq and secure it against renewed extremist violence following the three-year war against ISIS. A USIP team just spent nine days in Iraq for talks with government and civil society leaders, part of the Institute’s years-long effort to help the country stabilize. The Kuwait conference will gather government, business and civil society leaders to consider a reconstruction that Iraq has said could cost $100 billion. USIP’s president, Nancy Lindborg, and Middle East program director, Sarhang Hamasaeed, say any realistic rebuilding plan must focus also on the divisions and grievances in Iraq that led to ISIS’ violence and that still exist.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Violent Extremism

Understanding China’s Response to the Rakhine Crisis

Understanding China’s Response to the Rakhine Crisis

Thursday, February 8, 2018

By: Adrienne Joy

Following attacks on police posts by an armed Rohingya militia in August 2017, reprisals by the Burmese government have precipitated a humanitarian crisis. More than six hundred thousand Rohingya have fled to Bangladesh, where they face an uncertain future. Publicly stating that the root cause of conflict in Rakhine is...

Global Policy

View All Publications