Larger political issues between India and Pakistan—from border conflicts to mutual government mistrust to long-standing rivalry—have been the main driver for the limited trade and economic cooperation between the two countries. This report, however, makes the case that working within existing protocols to enhance existing trade and cooperation, rather than addressing the more obvious and chronic political issues, is necessary to peacebuilding in the region. 

Summary

  • India and Pakistan have a troubled past that includes four wars and countless skirmishes. Even when some form of peace and tranquility has prevailed, conditions have been far from conducive for economic and trade relations.
  • Despite these tensions, bilateral trade has grown many times and is officially reported to be around $2.2 billion today. Unofficial estimates suggest that it is twice this amount, and that the potential for trade is many times what is currently traded.
  • Politics aside, the reasons for limited India-Pakistan trade are rooted in managerial, bureaucratic, transportation, and other local issues.
  • High-profile political initiatives often incur resistance from lobbies and powerful groups, both economic and political, that are opposed to India and Pakistan improving their trade, economic, and political relations.
  • Restricted exportable items, poor rail and road connectivity, logistics, and facilitation are key impediments to expanding trade.
  • Streamlining some of these logistical issues would benefit trade significantly. Not only would trade increase, but welfare gains to the industry and to the consumers would also be substantial in both countries.
  • Peacebuilding and peacemaking will always be subject to the larger political issues between India and Pakistan, but economic and trade cooperation offers a clear way toward greater stability and peace between both countries and across South Asia as a whole.

About the Report

This report makes the case for working within existing protocols to enhance trade and cooperation between India and Pakistan rather than attempting to address chronic bilateral political issues directly. Drawn on numerous published studies and in-country interviews, the report argues that trade between the two countries could play an important role in addressing prospects for peace in South Asia. The report was commissioned by the South Asia program of the United States Institute of Peace given the Institute’s long-standing and wide-ranging commitment to strengthening peacebuilding in the region.

About the Author

S. Akbar Zaidi is a visiting professor at Columbia University in New York, holds a joint position in the School of International and Public Affairs and in the Department of Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies, and is an adjunct professor at the Institute of Business Administration (IBA) in Karachi. Farheen Ghaffar, an IBA graduate, is involved with a Karachi nonprofit that focuses on education. Saba Aslam, also an IBA graduate, is a researcher


Related Research & Analysis

What Do Changes in China’s Nuclear Program Mean for India?

What Do Changes in China’s Nuclear Program Mean for India?

Thursday, March 13, 2025

At the end of 2024, the annual U.S. Department of Defense report on military and security developments in China reinforced evolving assessments of China’s rapid nuclear expansion with an alarming projection: The U.S. expects China to have 1,000 nuclear warheads by 2030 despite having maintained a nuclear arsenal of approximately 300 warheads for decades.

Type: Analysis

Modi’s Washington Visit Signals U.S.-India Ties Will Continue Upswing

Modi’s Washington Visit Signals U.S.-India Ties Will Continue Upswing

Wednesday, February 19, 2025

Last week, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Washington marked the fourth meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and a foreign leader since the start of the new administration. Despite differences over tariffs, Modi’s trip signaled that U.S.-Indian relations will continue along the positive trajectory seen in recent years, particularly in defense and technology cooperation. Trump made clear that he sees value in India’s role as a counterweight to China, but that he also views Delhi as an important player and key partner outside the context of strategic rivalry.

Type: Question and Answer

Daniel Markey on U.S.-India Ties in the Year Ahead

Daniel Markey on U.S.-India Ties in the Year Ahead

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

U.S.-India relations under the new Trump administration “got off to a decent start” with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Washington, D.C., last week, says USIP’s Daniel Markey, who added that while there is some friction over looming tariffs, the U.S. approach to trade and defense seemed to be “music to India’s ears.”

Type: Podcast

I2U2: India’s Diplomatic Tool for a Changing World Order

I2U2: India’s Diplomatic Tool for a Changing World Order

Monday, February 3, 2025

Using I2U2 as its main case study, this discussion paper looks specifically at New Delhi’s rationale for pursuing minilaterals that extend beyond bilateral ties and avoid the rigidities associated with formal multilateral groupings. I2U2 is the first minilateral involving India and the United States in the Middle East and also offers an example of how the two countries may work cooperatively on regional initiatives that complement one another’s strategic and economic interests.

Type: Discussion Paper

View All Research & Analysis