For several years, Afghanistan’s economy and public finances have worsened, culminating in a full-blown fiscal crisis in 2014. Political uncertainties, the weakening Afghan economy, corruption in tax collection, stagnant government revenues, and increasing expenditures have contributed to the current fiscal impasse.  In the absence of bold actions by the Afghan government along with proactive international support to turn around the fiscal situation, the fiscal crisis and its insidious effects will continue. 

Summary

  • The fiscal crisis that has been building over several years in Afghanistan came to a head in 2014, with no abatement in recent months and limited potential for improvement in the current year.
  • Political uncertainty, the weakening Afghan economy, corruption in tax collection, and stagnant government revenues, as well as increasing security and other expenditures, all contributed to the current fiscal crisis.
  • Massive ongoing international assistance (especially for Afghan National Security Forces) and stopgap measures by the Afghan government have averted an outright fiscal collapse.
  • The crisis is having deeply insidious effects, however: The apparent political gridlock in the National Unity Government is being paralleled by financial gridlock.
  • A combination of bold, coordinated actions would be required to break out of the current fiscal impasse, but it seems doubtful whether the Afghan government and its international partners are prepared to do this.

About this Brief

William A. Byrd is a senior expert at the U.S. Institute of Peace, who has been following fiscal and other developments in Afghanistan. He has published extensively on Afghanistan’s economy and related topics. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Institute of Peace, which does not take policy positions.


Related Research & Analysis

Understanding the Implications of the Taliban’s Opium Ban in Afghanistan

Understanding the Implications of the Taliban’s Opium Ban in Afghanistan

Thursday, December 12, 2024

The Taliban’s opium ban, coupled with Afghan farmers’ replacement of poppy largely with low-value wheat, is likely to worsen dissatisfaction and political tensions. The Taliban’s persistence in enforcing the ban has been notable, especially in 2024. If the ban remains in place, it would demonstrate the regime’s strength but also worsen rural poverty, increase dissatisfaction among landholders and spur political instability. This will likely lead to increased humanitarian needs and more pressures for outmigration to nearby countries and beyond, both of which are of interest to the U.S. and other Western countries. Conversely, if the ban weakens in response to pressures and resistance, a revival of widespread poppy cultivation could undermine the regime’s authority. Aid alone will not offset the economic shock of the ban, nor stimulate the long-term growth needed to effectively combat the opium problem.

Type: Analysis

How Afghanistan’s Economy Can Survive Shrinking Shipments of U.N. Cash Aid

How Afghanistan’s Economy Can Survive Shrinking Shipments of U.N. Cash Aid

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Afghanistan’s precarious economy is facing a new set of multidimensional risks as humanitarian aid — delivered in massive shipments of U.S. cash dollars — shrinks rapidly amid competing demands from other crises around the world. The dollar inflows, moved under U.N. auspices, have helped stabilize the Afghan economy, cover its mammoth trade deficit, and inject monetary liquidity into commerce. With much smaller cash infusions, in line with a general reduction in aid, the suffering of Afghanistan’s poverty-stricken population is likely to increase.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis