A Filipino activist fighting human trafficking, a member of a watchdog group in Uruguay, an Egyptian peacebuilder, an anti-corruption campaigner from Ghana, a Dutch freedom-of-expression activist and an American tech- and civic-engagement guru – these are just a few of 47 civic leaders who met in Turkey this month to discuss ways of supporting civil society in an era of increasing government repression.

Pro-democracy protesters stand in a formation after coming under assault in the Mong Kok neighborhood of Hong Kong, Oct. 3, 2014. Photo Credit: The New York Times/Adam Ferguson
Photo courtesy of The New York Times/Adam Ferguson

The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Swedish International Development Agency (Sida) gathered us in a make-shift classroom in central Istanbul to brainstorm innovations that could help active citizens defend and reclaim civic space. The forum was a result of the multinational Stand With Civil Society initiative, announced by President Barack Obama during a United Nations General Assembly meeting in 2013 to address the worrisome crackdowns against civil society in countries around the world.

The precise roles for governments and businesses in the regional hubs were hotly debated.

The President, together with other heads of state and leaders from civil society and private foundations, called for a global effort to improve the enabling environment for active civic engagement. This includes challenging legal and bureaucratic restrictions on activism, prohibitions on foreign funding, active criminalization of dissent, sophisticated cyber-repression and off-line targeting of nonviolent activists. 

This September, at the Clinton Global Initiative forum on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, Obama called for the development of new “tools and platforms” to support non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and non-traditional civil society. The President was surrounded by activists and civic leaders from around the world, including some who had just received a two-day course on civic mobilization at USIP in Washington.

To help drive the effort, USAID and Sida, through their joint Civil Society Innovation Initiative, launched a “co-creation” process that brought civil society and donors together to hash out what those tools and platforms should look like.  That was the process at work in Istanbul.   

The vision guiding the meeting was a “vibrant, pluralistic and rights-based civil society in developing countries using new and innovative funding mechanisms, working methods and means of cooperation through the establishment of demand-driven and cutting-edge civil society hubs.”  

Designing regional hubs

The central aim of the Nescafe-fuelled workshop, facilitated by the social-impact firm, Reboot, and the global civil society network, CIVICUS, was to develop blueprints for a number of interlinking regional “hubs” around the world. The hubs would support digital and/or physical peer-to-peer learning; create platforms for traditional and non-traditional civil society groups to access the latest approaches as well as information and communication technologies (ICT)  to address their most pressing issues; and amplify civil society voices around the world.  

After three days of intense discussions, creative problem-solving activities and concerted planning, blueprints for the “hubs” surfaced.   First the participants identified the most pressing challenges faced by civil society around the world.  In addition to the closing-space phenomenon, these included:

  • Legitimacy crises faced by many traditional NGOs.
  • Growing gaps between donors, NGOs and grassroots activists and movements.
  • Difficulty integrating ICT tools and combining on-line and off-line activism.
  • Donor approaches that weren’t sustainable because their focus was limited to discrete projects rather than a longer-term result.

The civil society participants strongly urged the donors to rethink their approaches so they could support initiatives lasting no less than a decade.           

The workshop also developed concepts for the regional civil society hubs.  After discussing attributes that would make the hubs most valuable, participants self-selected into regional teams that focused on Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, the Middle East and North Africa, Asia, and Europe/Eurasia.  The task of each team was to develop hub blueprints that included mission, objectives, stakeholders, governance framework and a business plan.  The daylong planning process, which generated no shortage of exuberance, exasperation and inventive thinking, concluded with briefings by each of the teams for the full group.    

'Movement Building' vs. Top-Down

Although each hub blueprint featured region-specific characteristics, the commonalities were striking.  All of the regional teams agreed that the hubs should build on existing national and regional civil society campaigns and networks.  Common suggestions included peer-to-peer capacity building, connecting civic groups to resources, and supporting locally-generated data and analyses.

All the groups emphasized the critical importance of engaging grassroots, non-traditional civil society and those outside of capital cities. My research partner, Erica Chenoweth, and I have documented how these players historically have driven social and political transformations, even in the most repressive environments. One participant reflected that “movement building” rather than top-down advocacy should be the ethos guiding the effort.    

The exact functions and focus points for each hub, participants suggested, should be decided following more extensive local consultations with civic organizations and activists from each region.  Such consultations would shape decisions about the physical and/or virtual aspects of the hubs. 

Questions of funding

Most of the teams floated the idea of multiple hubs or “hublets” because no single hub could cover an entire region.  Teams also conceived of an international hub that could help coordinate between the regional hubs, liaise with donors and amplify the voices of local civic activists at the global level.  

There was rough agreement that membership in the hubs would determine the governance structure.  As for the business model, the teams came up with a number of creative options, which mostly included some combination of donor contributions, private funding, crowd-sourcing and investment funds. 

The precise roles for governments and businesses in the regional hubs were hotly debated.  Nothing resembling consensus emerged.  Such relationships would be worked out in region-specific ways following local consultations.   

The workshop concluded with expressions of gratitude that civic activists were involved in the development of the idea, and with sober realism about future steps.  One participant noted that she had never been worked so hard at a workshop but enjoyed the opportunity to interact with her cohorts, almost all of whom she had met for the first time.

The prospect of Turkish mezze and baklava that night intensified the warm feelings.  USAID and Sida emphasized that the Istanbul gathering was the beginning of the process, and that their respective governments were committed to the effort. 

Given the scale of the challenges in an era of closing space and democratic recession, one can only hope that this initiative will help gutsy activists and nonviolent change agents fight back and win. 

Related Publications

Five Factors Shaping the Future of Egypt-Israel Relations

Five Factors Shaping the Future of Egypt-Israel Relations

Thursday, June 13, 2024

The Gaza war has strained Egyptian-Israeli relations to an unprecedented level and raised questions about the future of their 1979 peace treaty that has been a cornerstone of Arab-Israeli peace. U.S. officials met recently in Cairo with their Israeli and Egyptian counterparts against a backdrop of mutually diminishing confidence between the two parties, particularly following Israel’s ground offensive in Rafah. This comes on the heels of a shooting incident between Israeli and Egyptian forces that left at least one Egyptian soldier dead, and Egypt joining South Africa’s case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Along with Qatar, Egypt is a key broker in the current Israel-Hamas cease-fire efforts and engages in extensive security cooperation with the U.S. and Israel.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Is China Eyeing a Second Military Base in Africa?

Is China Eyeing a Second Military Base in Africa?

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

For over three decades, every Chinese foreign minister’s first overseas trip of the year has been to Africa. This year continued the tradition with China’s foreign minister, Wang Yi, visiting Egypt, Tunisia, Togo and Côte d'Ivoire. Notably, every one of these countries is coastal. And yet, at a time of continued speculation over China’s next military installation in Africa, none of these countries has featured prominently as potential locations in previous analyses. We might, therefore, reasonably ask what China’s current considerations are around basing in Africa. Faced with an increasingly multipolar and assertive Africa at a time of domestic economic challenge, however, China’s long-term strategy remains unclear.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Six Dilemmas Facing Egypt

Six Dilemmas Facing Egypt

Thursday, January 18, 2024

Since Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007, Egypt has been heavily involved in efforts to end the military confrontations and wars that have periodically broken out in Gaza. However, the scope, scale and stakes of the current war is unlike any prior round of hostilities. In response to the massacre and hostage-taking of mostly Israeli civilians by Hamas and other militant armed groups during their devastating attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, Israel has launched one of the most destructive wars in its history. Indeed, this war will be transformational in numerous ways, with ramifications for several stakeholders beyond the parties themselves.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

How a Gaza Marine Deal Could Benefit Palestinians, Israelis and the Region

How a Gaza Marine Deal Could Benefit Palestinians, Israelis and the Region

Thursday, August 3, 2023

Amid today’s dismal Israeli-Palestinian context, positive developments have been in short supply. However, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s June announcement of preliminary approval for the development of the Gaza Marine gas fields provided a rare glimpse of a potential win-win opportunity. For the Palestinians, it could provide a much-needed boost to their lagging economy and the cash-strapped Palestinian Authority (PA). On the Israeli side, it allows the Netanyahu government to claim it is assisting in improving living conditions in Gaza and could lead to less U.S. pressure on issues like settlement expansion. In the big picture, this is another example of how energy is increasingly becoming a focus for potential win-win agreements in the East Mediterranean.

Type: Analysis


View All Publications