The United States Institute of Peace (USIP) and the Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) gathered experts and practitioners from across and outside the U.S. government earlier this spring to assess the lessons and challenges for overseeing aid distributed in active conflict areas such as Afghanistan. The highlights of those discussions are now available in a conference report released today by the two organizations.

Humanitarian, development, and oversight organiza­tions in Afghanistan are finding it progressively more difficult to access development and reconstruction project sites in many areas of the country due to dete­riorating security conditions. As a result of the volatile security environment in Afghanistan and other conflict areas, humanitarian and development organizations are increasingly turning to remote management and moni­toring approaches in order to continue providing assis­tance while safeguarding the security of their personnel.

Remote management poses particular challenges to conducting effective project monitoring and oversight, ensuring program effectiveness and accountability, and mitigating against fraud and corruption.

In a recent study, humanitarian and development orga­nizations raised the following issues and concerns with respect to the use of remote management: potential deterioration in program quality; deterioration in the potential to ensure effective and rigorous monitoring; reduced regularity of visits and access to project imple­mentation areas; inaccuracy of project data and report­ing; limited capacity of their own and partner personnel; deterioration in technical oversight of projects, particu­larly those with a complex focus such as infrastructure or engineering; poor communication between country and field offices; increased danger and risks to local or national personnel, communities, and beneficiaries; in­creased pressure and expectations (social and political) on local staff; and increased risk of the occurrence of fraud and corruption.

These are not new issues or challenges. In countries throughout the world, development experts have de­signed and implemented projects that provide for strong monitoring and evaluation despite the challenges. Good practices and innovative approaches to remote project management and monitoring need to be identified and shared in order to help ensure program quality and ac­countability in the complex, dynamic, and fluid operat­ing environment of reconstruction in Afghanistan.

For this reason,SIGAR and USIP partnered to present an international symposium on “Monitoring and Management in Insecure Environments: Applying Best Practices to Afghanistan.” The objective was to engage the U.S. agencies, international donor community, and think tanks involved in development and reconstruction work in Afghanistan in a focused discussion to identify and discuss past and current best practices, techniques and technologies, as well as limitations and challenges, of sustaining effective management and monitoring in insecure environments.

The symposium was held on February 12, 2014, at USIP headquarters in Washington, DC. To encourage candid discussion and the free exchange of ideas, SIGAR and USIP adopted a policy of non-attri­bution for the symposium. However, this report describes on a non-attribution basis the symposium discussions and the major themes that emerged from those discus­sions.


Related Research & Analysis

Understanding the Implications of the Taliban’s Opium Ban in Afghanistan

Understanding the Implications of the Taliban’s Opium Ban in Afghanistan

Thursday, December 12, 2024

The Taliban’s opium ban, coupled with Afghan farmers’ replacement of poppy largely with low-value wheat, is likely to worsen dissatisfaction and political tensions. The Taliban’s persistence in enforcing the ban has been notable, especially in 2024. If the ban remains in place, it would demonstrate the regime’s strength but also worsen rural poverty, increase dissatisfaction among landholders and spur political instability. This will likely lead to increased humanitarian needs and more pressures for outmigration to nearby countries and beyond, both of which are of interest to the U.S. and other Western countries. Conversely, if the ban weakens in response to pressures and resistance, a revival of widespread poppy cultivation could undermine the regime’s authority. Aid alone will not offset the economic shock of the ban, nor stimulate the long-term growth needed to effectively combat the opium problem.

Type: Analysis

How Afghanistan’s Economy Can Survive Shrinking Shipments of U.N. Cash Aid

How Afghanistan’s Economy Can Survive Shrinking Shipments of U.N. Cash Aid

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Afghanistan’s precarious economy is facing a new set of multidimensional risks as humanitarian aid — delivered in massive shipments of U.S. cash dollars — shrinks rapidly amid competing demands from other crises around the world. The dollar inflows, moved under U.N. auspices, have helped stabilize the Afghan economy, cover its mammoth trade deficit, and inject monetary liquidity into commerce. With much smaller cash infusions, in line with a general reduction in aid, the suffering of Afghanistan’s poverty-stricken population is likely to increase.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis