Members of the South Sudanese diaspora gathered at the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) last week to explore ways of fostering their national unity, supporting peace efforts in a conflict with tribal dimensions and countering online speech that disparages people of other tribes.

The South Sudanese joining in the USIP workshop also visited the nearby Lincoln Memorial.
The South Sudanese joining in the USIP workshop also visited the nearby Lincoln Memorial.

The February 6-7 workshop brought together 20 South Sudanese who are community leaders or activists in the United States and who maintain significant contacts with people in their homeland. Instructors from USIP identified participants and organized the conversations, and the group received a briefing from Ambassador Donald Booth, the U.S. special envoy to Sudan and South Sudan.

The South Sudanese, who come from a variety of tribal backgrounds and regions of South Sudan, as well as personal and professional experiences, expressed a desire to work together to encourage their countrymen to avoid rhetoric that triggers animosity, feeds polarizing stereotypes or blames those from other tribal backgrounds for their nation’s internal conflict. As one put it in the concluding session, “We ought to identify ourselves as South Sudanese rather than by tribe.”

“Each tribe has a pre-conceived idea of other tribes,” said one South Sudanese participant who lives in Virginia, Natalina Malwal. “Social media has been used to fuel it—using antagonistic language….The choice of words is very important right now. People need to think about it two or three times before they write it.”

South Sudan, the world’s newest independent nation, includes a patchwork of tribes spread across a large but impoverished land. A simmering political dispute involving the current president, Salva Kiir, and the former vice president, Riek Machar, broke into violence in mid-December, quickly leading to fighting between units of the national army and militia groups along with attacks and reprisals targeting specific ethnic groups, particularly between members of the Dinka and Nuer tribes.

More than 10,000 South Sudanese are believed to have died in the ensuing fighting, and about 770,000 have fled their homes. A ceasefire between representatives of Kiir and Machar was signed on January 23, but some of its terms have not been fulfilled and smaller-scale fighting has continued. Peace talks that were to have resumed on February 10 did not begin on schedule amid sharp tensions between the two camps.

The gathering of influential diaspora leaders—all of whom were recommended by other South Sudanese—was intended to help jumpstart awareness among South Sudanese at home and abroad about online comments that are propagating stereotypes, discrimination and blame of ethnic groups and about online opportunities to convey attitudes conducive to supporting unity and peace efforts. “We want them to disseminate this information back to their communities and share it,” said Jacki Wilson, a workshop organizer and senior program officer at USIP’s Academy for International Conflict Management and Peacebuilding. She was joined in guiding the workshop by two Institute colleagues—Linda Bishai and Alison Milofsky.

Bishai, a senior program officer in USIP’s Center for the Middle East and Africa, urged participants to re-examine any prejudices they and others might harbor and to be aware of intolerance. “This isn’t genetic—in your DNA. You can challenge it,” she said. “You have to question why you were taught that those people are less worthy than you.”

Milofsky, a senior program officer with the Academy, said it was important to be “thinking about how to phrase things in ways that reduce a person’s defensiveness,” adding later, “We’re talking about being open to multiple perspectives.”

USIP and other specialists watching social media and other online commentary about South Sudan’s conflict have spotted numerous instances of disparaging speech that reveal deep anger and stereotyping of other groups. The degree to which that online speech has encouraged specific violence in South Sudan is unclear, but there is a recent and tragic history to recall in which media messages helped foment tribal violence, including radio’s role in the 1994 Rwandan genocide and hate speech transmitted on radio and online after Kenya’s 2007 elections.

The group reviewed online comments to articles posted on the well-known news source “Sudan Tribune.”  Though the passages seemed relatively benign at first glance, the participants quickly identified racial slurs, “trigger” words that antagonize certain groups and convey superiority, polarizing and dividing rhetoric and even dehumanizing terms. The exercise seemed to be eye-opening for the group, stirring emotions but also providing a powerful learning opportunity.

By contrast, some online comments related to the South Sudan conflict have called for national unity and leadership. “Our leader should be like a Mandela,” said one. “It is time to unite, to work together, to reform ourselves and be a [sic] nationalists.” Said another message, “I don’t support war… this is not the time to blame or accuse one another.”

Wilson said that “dehumanizing” others online or elsewhere can fuel a “revenge mentality” and hatred, and South Sudanese should think about ways to counter it. “If you don’t confront [such speech], you’re a bystander,” she said. “The weight of responsibility is on you.”

Jok Madut Jok, a former official in the South Sudanese government and now chairman of the board of the USIP-supported and Juba-based Sudd Institute, urged the group to use social media and other online exchanges to promote peace and tolerance.  According to Jok, “we could hide behind the anonymity of the Internet and spew out nonsense about each other. …But there is still a voice of reason in all of us that can be harnessed.” He added, “It takes one person to change things.”

Jane Abucha, a South Sudanese nurse-practitioner who now lives in the Phoenix area, said the workshop will be helpful, but its themes “need to be expanded to other communities,” including to the many who lack Internet access in South Sudan.

Explore further

Related Publications

Conflict Management Training for Peacekeepers (French)

Conflict Management Training for Peacekeepers (French)

Friday, February 23, 2018

By: Alison Milofsky; Joseph Sany; Illana M. Lancaster; Jeff Krentel

Ce rapport examine le rôle de la Formation à la gestion des conflits dans la préparation des soldats de la paix aux missions des Nations Unies/de l’Union africaine, à travers une évaluation du programme de Formation à la gestion des conflits pour les soldats de la paix proposée par l’USIP. L’évaluation s’appuie sur des données collectées au travers de 137 entretiens semi-structurés avec des soldats de la paix formés par l’USIP et rentrés au pays, des membres de la communauté dans les zones où des soldats de la paix ont été déployés en mission, et des formateurs de pré-déploiement. Le rapport étudie les résultats de l’évaluation et propose des recommandations non seulement pour la formation de l’USIP à l’intention des soldats de la paix mais aussi pour élargir la portée des politiques et des pratiques en matière de maintien de la paix.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Education & Training

South Sudan’s Pitfalls of Power Sharing

South Sudan’s Pitfalls of Power Sharing

Friday, February 16, 2018

By: USIP Staff; Susan Stigant; Aly Verjee

This week, a new proposal for a power sharing government was tabled at the ongoing Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) High Level Revitalization Forum (HLRF) peace talks for South Sudan. An earlier, 2015 peace deal also contained a formula for power sharing; that arrangement failed and the civil war re-ignited a year later. Power sharing arrangements are appropriate if certain conditions are met, but not enough has been done to ensure the latest proposal will overcome the obstacles present in South Sudan, according to Susan Stigant, USIP’s director for Africa programs and Aly Verjee, a visiting expert at USIP and a former senior advisor to the IGAD mediation, who comment on the proposal and suggest how it could be improved.

Democracy & Governance; Fragility & Resilience; Global Policy

South Sudan’s Renewable Energy Potential

South Sudan’s Renewable Energy Potential

Thursday, January 4, 2018

By: David Mozersky; Daniel M. Kammen

The world’s newest country, South Sudan, is also the least electrified. A period of growth that began after a 2005 peace deal and continued after independence in 2011, saw billions of dollars in oil revenue and strong international support. This period was for powered by diesel generators and...

Economics & Environment

View All Publications