On November 28, USIP hosted a roundtable discssion with Afghan Deputy Minister of Mines Nasir Ahmad Durrani and violence prevention expert Sadaf Lakhani, along with representatives from U.S. government agencies, international organizations and nongovernmental organizations.

December 10, 2012

USIP, on Nov. 28, hosted a roundtable discussion on ways that the Afghan government can empower civil society to play a meaningful role in the country’s oil, gas and mineral industries. Afghan Deputy Minister of Mines Nasir Ahmad Durrani and violence prevention expert Sadaf Lakhani participated in the roundtable, along with representatives from U.S. government agencies, international organizations and nongovernmental organizations. USIP’s Scott Smith, Deputy Director of USIP’s Afghanistan Program, moderated the discussion, which was organized by Rebecca Kullman, Program Specialist in the Center for Sustainable Economies.

Transitions from conflict to peace in general are difficult, long-term processes. These transitions are especially challenging for resource-rich countries like Afghanistan. If extractive sector opportunities are not well-managed, they could reignite conflict by exacerbating inequalities, creating environmental damage, or generating social friction from the displacement of populations.

Civil society engagement, however, has the potential to mitigate violence and benefit Afghanistan in several ways. First, it can facilitate resource management and help address grievances before they devolve into violent conflict. Second, engagement between the government and civil society can enhance social accountability and lead to improved relations between people and the state, a key aspect of strengthening democratic processes and stability over the long-term.


Related Research & Analysis

Understanding the Implications of the Taliban’s Opium Ban in Afghanistan

Understanding the Implications of the Taliban’s Opium Ban in Afghanistan

Thursday, December 12, 2024

The Taliban’s opium ban, coupled with Afghan farmers’ replacement of poppy largely with low-value wheat, is likely to worsen dissatisfaction and political tensions. The Taliban’s persistence in enforcing the ban has been notable, especially in 2024. If the ban remains in place, it would demonstrate the regime’s strength but also worsen rural poverty, increase dissatisfaction among landholders and spur political instability. This will likely lead to increased humanitarian needs and more pressures for outmigration to nearby countries and beyond, both of which are of interest to the U.S. and other Western countries. Conversely, if the ban weakens in response to pressures and resistance, a revival of widespread poppy cultivation could undermine the regime’s authority. Aid alone will not offset the economic shock of the ban, nor stimulate the long-term growth needed to effectively combat the opium problem.

Type: Analysis

How Afghanistan’s Economy Can Survive Shrinking Shipments of U.N. Cash Aid

How Afghanistan’s Economy Can Survive Shrinking Shipments of U.N. Cash Aid

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Afghanistan’s precarious economy is facing a new set of multidimensional risks as humanitarian aid — delivered in massive shipments of U.S. cash dollars — shrinks rapidly amid competing demands from other crises around the world. The dollar inflows, moved under U.N. auspices, have helped stabilize the Afghan economy, cover its mammoth trade deficit, and inject monetary liquidity into commerce. With much smaller cash infusions, in line with a general reduction in aid, the suffering of Afghanistan’s poverty-stricken population is likely to increase.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis