USIP's Tim Lucarro writes from USIP's field office in Kabul about what some of the city's big homes say about corruption in Afghanistan.

What Kabul's Chic Homes Say About Corruption and Governance
Photo courtesy of NY Times

Each day, the daily commute to USIP’s office in the Wazir Akbar Khan neighborhood of Kabul is punctuated with an unseemly five-minute passage through one of the most horrible sections of the city.

It is not rampant poverty or the scars from the nation’s four generations of war that mar the landscape. Instead it is the opulence and saccharine palaces built by some of Afghanistan’s most notorious warlords, narco-traffickers, and political elite that rise from the frozen streets like twisted gingerbread houses that taint the city. Their presence is a constant reminder of the systemic abuse of power, the inequity of the justice system and endemic corruption that has forged itself into so many areas of the nation since the Taliban’s fall in 2001.

Click here to learn more about USIP's programs in Afghanistan.

Twelve years ago, the Sher Pur area of Kabul was home to tangled blocks of single-story mud homes. These houses had been passed down over generations, often through systems of unregistered and informal titling.

In a nation that has been marked by decades of regime changes, the system of land titling and records of ownership are notoriously convoluted or missing. In 2004, some of the country’s most powerful families and political operatives recognized the expanding value of urban land and they began a systemic campaign to force families from their land and take it as their own. In many instances their actions were considered legal, as all land not formally registered or titled is considered government property – convenient for the government since nearly 75% of all land in Afghanistan is without official title.

Today, Sher Pur is home to some of the most gaudy, poorly-designed homes in all of Kabul. Like most things in town, the styles have been imported from Pakistan and various Gulf states. They are designs meant to be cool during the hot summers of South Asia and the Middle East, but are not built to retain heat well in the high altitude winters of Kabul.

Form over function is their trademark. These homes offer a daily reminder of how a few powerful families and individuals have thrived since 2001, using donor aid, military interventions and perpetually weak governance to their own advantage and to the detriment of Afghanistan’s poorest and most vulnerable. It is a reminder not only to those of us who commute past each day, but to all those who live in Kabul who have born witness to the inequitable growth of a few politically connected families.

Many of those families have ties to former warlords and war criminals who have been allies of NATO forces since 2001. The new bourgeoisie of Afghanistan use their influence within the government to quasi-legally grab land and further entrench their wealth. This happens not just in Sher Pur, but in other sections of the city and throughout the country.

The international community’s support for these leaders and the government system they control is repeatedly cited by the Afghan public as evidence of the international community’s self-interest and indifference to the Afghan people. Whether or not this is true is irrelevant because the perception is real. Partnerships and strategies that were first born of political expediency over a decade ago have led to the long-term de-legitimacy of the state and the international community’s efforts in Afghanistan in the eyes of the general citizenry. The state has come to be seen as serving its own interests, protecting the benefits and windfalls that have been captured by a small elite, at the sacrifice of the genuine protection and support for the rest of the Afghan populace.

Sadly, the daily trip past the houses of Sher Pur, dripping with their external refinement and plastered in a veneer of legitimacy, belies the foundation upon which they have been built. Beside the new mansions, you can see the shattered remains of previous homes, the broken hopes of many Afghans for a government that puts the needs of the people above its own greed.

Click here to read a Q&A with Tim Luccaro about Afghan President Hamid Karzai's call to discuss the U.S.-Afghanistan relationship.

 

Related Publications

Johnny Walsh on Election Season in Afghanistan

Johnny Walsh on Election Season in Afghanistan

Wednesday, November 14, 2018

By: Johnny Walsh

As Afghans wait for official results from the parliamentary polls, Johnny Walsh says that the country is already entering “high political season” in preparation for the critical April 2019 presidential election. Although the Taliban continues to carry out high-profile attacks across the country, Walsh says that many Afghans are focused on the presidential polls and its implications for the peace process.

Democracy & Governance

James Mattis: Yemen Needs a Truce Within 30 Days

James Mattis: Yemen Needs a Truce Within 30 Days

Wednesday, October 31, 2018

By: USIP Staff

Secretary of Defense James Mattis yesterday urged combatants in Yemen, including Saudi Arabia and Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi faction, to negotiate a cease-fire in that war within 30 days while speaking to diplomats, military officers and conflict-resolution specialists at the U.S. Institute of Peace. In a webcast conversation moderated by former national security advisor and USIP Chair Stephen J. Hadley, Mattis also discussed global security challenges facing the United States—from Russia and China, to North Korea—cybersecurity and the need for the developed world to help fragile states improve their governance and address the root causes of extremism.

Civilian-Military Relations; Global Policy

For the Afghan Peace Process to Work, Women Must be Involved

For the Afghan Peace Process to Work, Women Must be Involved

Monday, October 29, 2018

By: Belquis Ahmadi; Marjan Nahavandi

The bottom line is Afghan women want peace and they want to have a say in how it is negotiated. Without women at the negotiation table, a long-term and inclusive peace is dramatically less likely. Indeed, studies show that the inclusion of women in peace negotiations, leads to peace agreements that are representative of the needs of the people they affect and, therefore, more sustainable.

Gender; Peace Processes

View All Publications