Truth Commission: Truth and Reconciliation Commission for Serbia and Montenegro
Duration: 2002 - 2003
Charter: Presidential decree 59/02
Commissioners: 15-19
Report: No report


Truth Commission: Truth and Reconciliation Commission for Serbia and Montenegro, also called the Yugoslav Truth and Reconciliation Commission (Komisija za istinu i pomirenje)

Dates of Operation: February 2002 – February 2003 (12 months; disbanded two years short of its mandate)

Background: The former Yugoslavia was established in 1918, federalizing an ethnic mix of Albanians, Bosnians, Croats, Kosovars, Montenegrins, Serbs, Slovenians and others. After longtime ruler Josef Broz Tito’s death in 1980, ethnic tensions began to rise and Yugoslavia started to disintegrate. Serbian leader Slobodan Milošević sought to restore pre-1974 Serbian sovereignty over the autonomous regions of Vojvodina and of Kosovo. Multi-party elections in 1991 led to the secession of Croatia and Slovenia from the Yugoslav state in June 1991. After unification negotiations failed, Milošević proceeded to lead the predominantly Serbian army of Yugoslavia in a campaign of ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, Croatia, and Slovenia between 1991 and 1995. Bosnian and Croat forces also took part in wartime atrocities.

The Dayton Peace Accords were brokered by the U.S. in November 1995 to stop the Yugoslav war. The resulting parliamentary and municipal elections in 1996 were largely against Milošević, but he continued to control the parliament and security forces. In 1998, Milošević began concerted efforts to suppress the ethnic Albanian population in Kosovo in the name of the Serbian minority. After additional monitoring and negotiation efforts failed, NATO led a military intervention in March 1999. When Serbian forces were defeated, Milošević lost power as president, and was succeeded by Vojislav Kostunica.

On February 22, 2002, Kostunica inaugurated the Yugoslav Truth and Reconciliation Commission to investigate war crimes committed in Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo.

Charter: Presidential Decree (PDF-123KB) issued by President Kostunica on March 30, 2001 (Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Official Gazette No. 15/01, 59/02).

Mandate: The Yugoslav Truth and Reconciliation Commission was mandated to research the social, inter-communal and political conflicts in the period from 1980 to 2000, document its own work and establish cooperation with related commissions in neighboring countries.

Commissioners and Structure: Members of the Yugoslav Truth and Reconciliation Commission were appointed by the President. The commission was originally comprised of fifteen members: twelve men and three women. Four members were added to increase ethnic diversity but the ideological, ethnic, and political homogeneity of the commissioners still prevented it from being seen as an impartial body. Two members later resigned because of disagreements over the Commission’s composition and mandate; another resigned due to obligations with a government post, and one passed away.

Report: No report was issued because the commission ultimately disbanded in early 2003 because of a lack of agreement on essential aspects of the mandate, a lack of political will, funding and civil society support.

Special Notes: The commission was not perceived as an impartial body within the country and even less across the region. While members included persons from different political perspectives within Serbia, ethnic and religious minorities were underrepresented. The work of the commission was complicated by the fact that the former Yugoslavia has broken up into multiple independent countries. As a national truth commission, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission for Serbia and Montenegro attempted to examine the causes and consequences of a region-wide conflict exclusively from the Serbian perspective. Several civil society groups from Serbia, Croatia as well as Bosnia and Herzegovina are currently calling for a new, regional, truth commission to establish and publicly disclose the facts about the war crimes committed throughout the former Yugoslavia.


Dimitrijevic, Nenad. "Serbia After the Criminal Past: What Went Wrong and what should be done." International Journal of Transitional Justice 2, no. 1 (March 1, 2008): 5-22.

Freeman, Mark. Serbia and Montenegro: Selected Developments in Transitional Justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, 2004. 

Garton Ash, Timothy. "A Nation in Denial." The Guardian, March 7, 2002, 2002. Available at (accessed June 10, 2008).

Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia. Annual Report Serbia 2007: Self-Isolation: Reality and the Goal. Belgrade: 2008. Available at (accessed February 9, 2011).

Humanitarian Law Center, Documenta, Research and Documentation Center. Civil Society Consultation on truth-seeking and truth-telling mechanisms about war crimes committed in the former Yugoslavia. Belgrage, Zagreb, Sarajevo: February 11, 2008. Available at (accessed accessed October 26, 2011).

Ilic, Dejan. "The Yugoslav Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Overcoming Cognitive Blocks." Eurozine, April 23, 2004. Available at (accessed June 10, 2008).

Pejic, Jelena. "The Yugoslav Truth and Reconciliation Commission: A Shaky Start." Fordham International Law Journal, 25, (2001): 1-22.

Peric, Tatjana. Facing the Past: Religious Communities, Truth and Reconciliation in Post-Milošević Serbia, Harvard University Kokkalis Program, 2004. Available at (accessed July 3, 2008).

Simic, Jelena and Humanitarian Law Center. E-Mail Correspondence, July 2, 2008.

Vasovic, Mirjana. "Commission for Truth and Reconciliation in FRY: Projects and Limitations." Lausanne, University of Lausanne, 2006. Available at (accessed July 3, 2008).


Related Publications

Education and Training in Nonviolent Resistance

Education and Training in Nonviolent Resistance

Wednesday, October 5, 2016

By: Nadine Bloch

Civil society around the world has demonstrated the ability to bring about change without violence. Critical to civil society’s success is preparing communities to undertake safe and strategic nonviolent action (NVA) movements. Previous research on NVA has focused on three broad methodologies: protest and persuasion, noncooperation, and intervention. This Report contributes to the knowledge on NVA by highlighting key strategic functions and outcomes of education and training–a fourth and crit...

Education & Training; Nonviolent Action

Security and Justice in Post-Revolution Libya

Security and Justice in Post-Revolution Libya

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

By: Fiona Mangan; Christina Murtaugh with support from Ferdaouis Bagga

Three years after the death of Muammar Qaddafi and the end of the revolution in Libya, security and justice are stalled and elusive despite the proliferation of security providers. The power of the gun prevails over the rule of law. Many see no end in sight. Based on a nationwide survey and drawn from interviews and focus group sessions, this report—supported by the USIP and the Small Arms Survey—tracks security and justice in Libya from before the revolution through today, its realities, and...

Justice in Transition in Yemen

Justice in Transition in Yemen

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

By: Erica Gaston with Nadwa al-Dawsari

This research is part of a three-year United States Institute of Peace (USIP) project that explores how Yemen’s rule of law and local justice and security issues have been affected in the post-Arab Spring transition period. A complement to other analytical and thematic pieces, this large-scale mapping provides data on factors influencing justice provision in half of Yemen’s governorates. Its goal is to support more responsive programming and justice sector reform. Field research was managed b...

View All Publications