One of the first things the Ukrainian parliament did after the ouster of President Viktor Yanukovych last month was to repeal a law that allowed regional authorities to adopt Russian as a second official language after Ukrainian. The acting president understood the potential of the repeal to inflame tensions and vetoed the measure, but the moves highlight a larger question: what is the precise role of language in ethnic and national conflicts? Is language a driver of conflict, or is that merely a symptom of political and economic grievances?

Demonstrators wave flags and banners during a "March for Peace" rally opposing President Vladimir Putin and war in Ukraine, in Moscow, March 15, 2014.
Demonstrators wave flags and banners during a "March for Peace" rally opposing President Vladimir Putin and war in Ukraine, in Moscow, March 15, 2014. Photo Credit: The New York Times/Dmitry Kostyukov

Specialists discussed the link between language, linguistics, human rights and peacebuilding in the Symposium on Language, Peace and Security, held at USIP on Feb. 21, the date that marks UNESCO's International Mother Language Day. USIP’s Academy for International Conflict Management and Peacebuilding hosted the forum with SIL International, the Center for Applied Linguistics, and the Alliance for Peacebuilding.

Panelists offered especially interesting ideas about using language differences to bridge identity-based conflict in recent instances. One example came from participants Suwilai Presrirat and Unian Samoh of Mahidol University in Thailand, who discussed Patani Malay. That’s the primary spoken language of the ethnic group of the same name in the southernmost provinces of Thailand along the border with Malaysia.

Since the area came under Thai rule in the beginning of the twentieth century, tension has often arisen between the Patani Malay, who are Muslims, and the Buddhist majority in Thailand. Periods of fighting and opposition to the central government in Bangkok have been common, the latest being an armed insurgency that began 2004.

But the situation in southern Thailand is not clear-cut. As in many places where there is ethnic and linguistic diversity, people get along quite well most of the time, and there are hybrid or mixed identities. Indeed, Patani Malay is used as a lingua franca by ethnic Thai who live in the border region.

The Patani Malay dialect has traditionally not been a written language; when written communication was needed, people utilized an old form of Malay that used Arabic script. This is in contrast to the majority of Malay speakers in Malaysia and Indonesia, who use Latin script. A phonetic rendering of Patani Malay using the Thai alphabet was also introduced by the Thai government when it took control over the region.  

Many Patani Malay have consistently opposed the phonetic Thai version of the language, arguing that it would dilute the Patani Malay identity and culture and force those who speak that language to assimilate into the Thai majority.

In 2007, local educators initiated a bold program to bridge these linguistic differences. With Thai government support, a decision was made to use all three forms of the written language and not appear to be favoring one. The use of the Arabic script links to their traditions and history, the Latin script symbolizes the ties to Malays in neighboring countries, and the phonetic Thai script serves as a visual bridge with ethnic Thais in their own country. All three versions of the language are taught in schools and are used on public buildings.

The exact approach taken by the Patani Malay community is not a panacea, and this measure alone has not ended armed conflict in the south of Thailand. But it is an outstanding example of the kind of creative thinking that is essential for successful peacebuilding.

Indeed, this kind of reframing may further inspire new means to address deeply entrenched political and economic grievances. People have multiple identities in which they might find commonalities with their neighbors. But during conflict, especially when one of these identities becomes threatened or inflamed, people are more likely to focus on differences.

When there's too much division between primary identities, it is crucial to focus on secondary identities. Peacebuilders often work on a bridging identity, what is sometimes known as a third culture, to create or renew linkages between people. For example, a shared identity as mothers, or as grieving relatives, or as educational professionals, can be promoted to create dialogue between divided communities.

As participants in the Symposium on Language, Peace, and Security emphasized, the key is not for outsiders to try to impose a solution that bridges linguistic differences, but rather to bring motivated people together and help them find solutions that can be implemented in their communities.

For more information on ways for practitioners to work with local communities and find bridging solutions when there is identity-based conflict, see the following USIP Academy online course (currently offered at no charge): Engaging with Identity-Based Differences.

Peter Weinberger is a Senior Program Officer in USIP’s Academy for International Conflict Management and Peacebuilding.


Related Research & Analysis

Can India Advance Peace in Ukraine?

Can India Advance Peace in Ukraine?

Tuesday, January 14, 2025

Since the start of Russia’s war in Ukraine, India has worked to protect its strategic relationship with Russia while maintaining its burgeoning ties with the United States and Europe. India’s balancing act was on display earlier this year when Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Russia in July and made a historic trip to Ukraine the following month. Modi has portrayed a neutral stance on the Ukraine war and positioned India as a key player in any potential peace process.

Type: Question and Answer

Donald Jensen on the War in Ukraine’s Trajectory

Donald Jensen on the War in Ukraine’s Trajectory

Friday, January 3, 2025

As Ukraine considers the “politically loaded” question of whether to lower the age of military mobilization, Putin increasingly sees the war “not just as a land grab, but as a civilizational battle between Russia and the West,” says USIP’s Donald Jensen, adding: “We should not think that the war is anything close to being settled.”

Type: Podcast

Ukraine: The Inflection Point in the China-Russia Axis

Ukraine: The Inflection Point in the China-Russia Axis

Thursday, December 19, 2024

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has catalyzed a profound shift in global power dynamics: the deepening of the partnership between China and Russia. This relationship, while rooted in history, represents a significant departure from previous patterns of cooperation. China-Russia ties have evolved from a transactional relationship of convenience to a more durable strategic alignment, while continuing to fall short of a full-blown military alliance. This development challenges traditional Western assumptions about the limits of authoritarian cooperation and may signal the emergence of a new model of international partnership.

Type: Analysis

Protecting Water Infrastructure During War

Protecting Water Infrastructure During War

Friday, December 6, 2024

The weaponization of water resources is among the most devastating tools used in violent conflict. And while this tactic has been pervasive throughout history, it’s on the rise. State and non-state actors across the globe are increasingly exploiting the capture, control and outright destruction of water resources and related infrastructure to inflict indiscriminate human suffering and further their own strategic and military aims. To put this devastating trend into historical context: Out of all the recorded incidents targeting water infrastructure over the last 2,000 years, 41 percent have occurred since 2020.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis