Ukraine must not remain a country of great but unrealized potential. The International Monetary Fund package and other foreign assistance are helping stabilize Ukraine’s economy, but only an attractive business climate can result in the level of investment that will truly transform the country for the long term.

The Pretrivka market in Kiev, Ukraine, May 6, 2015. As the rest of Europe tries desperately to shrug off low inflation, Ukraine has added rapidly rising prices — officially up 61 percent, and perhaps more — to its long list of problems during its civil war with Russian-backed rebels. (Brendan Hoffman/The New York Times)
Photo Courtesy of The New York Times/Brendan Hoffman

Ukraine has the makings of a prosperous and diversified economy. Even under the present difficult conditions, Ukraine’s agricultural exports are booming – and the potential for expansion is tremendous. With the right investment climate, Ukraine can become a major information technology hub. It can also become energy independent and perhaps an energy exporter. Favorable wage levels and a central geographic location make Ukraine a highly attractive location for manufactures of all types. The tourism, consumer products, transportation and financial sectors all have great promise.

But much work remains to be done. The World Bank put Ukraine at 83rd place among 189 countries surveyed in its Ease of Doing Business report for 2016. This is lower than Belarus (44) or even Kyrgyzstan (67).

Despite the EuroMaidan Revolution, Ukraine -- fairly or not -- is seen as about as corrupt as it was during the Viktor Yanukovych kleptocracy. Transparency International’s 2014 Corruption Perception Index put Ukraine at 142nd of 175 countries surveyed, compared with a 144 ranking in 2013.

Direct foreign investment has fallen since the Maidan events. Investors don’t like uncertainly and that is what the Russian annexation of Crimea and assault on Donbas have wrought. But investors also don’t like a business climate characterized by insider deals, bribes and selective justice. And much of that remains in place.

The U.S. State Department’s 2015 report on Ukraine’s investment climate observed that “in practice, the court system is viewed as ineffectual, corrupt and in dire need of reform.” The lack of a proper legal system in Ukraine is the major reason why the U.S. share of direct foreign investment in Ukraine was only 1.9 percent in 2014.

Judicial reform is thus essential -- now. This must include the vetting, requalifying and, as needed, firing of existing judges and prosecutors -- and the hiring of new people untainted by the corruption of the past. Salaries of those who remain must be significantly increased to ward off bribery.

A level playing field – founded on rule of law -- will allow investors to compete based on who has the best product or service, not on who has the best political connections needed to obtain government contracts or concessions. Many of Ukraine’s tycoons are not businessmen at all. Rather, they obtained their fortunes from insider deals arranged with political actors and use their wealth to perpetuate privileged access to the state budget. Their influence corrupts the political and economic system and must end.

Investment is a vote of confidence; that vote remains elusive today for Ukraine. By focusing on reforms that foster an attractive investment climate, Ukraine’s leaders can set the stage for an era of sustained growth. Actions not words are needed for Ukraine to reach the tipping point -- when investors let the funds flow.

William B. Taylor is executive vice president of the U.S. Institute of Peace and former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine. Colin Cleary is a fellow at the United States Institute of Peace and former political counselor at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. government. The Russian version was published by Novoye Vremya. Reposted with permission from Kyiv Post. This article was first published on Nov. 18, 2015.


Related Research & Analysis

Can India Advance Peace in Ukraine?

Can India Advance Peace in Ukraine?

Tuesday, January 14, 2025

Since the start of Russia’s war in Ukraine, India has worked to protect its strategic relationship with Russia while maintaining its burgeoning ties with the United States and Europe. India’s balancing act was on display earlier this year when Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Russia in July and made a historic trip to Ukraine the following month. Modi has portrayed a neutral stance on the Ukraine war and positioned India as a key player in any potential peace process.

Type: Question and Answer

Donald Jensen on the War in Ukraine’s Trajectory

Donald Jensen on the War in Ukraine’s Trajectory

Friday, January 3, 2025

As Ukraine considers the “politically loaded” question of whether to lower the age of military mobilization, Putin increasingly sees the war “not just as a land grab, but as a civilizational battle between Russia and the West,” says USIP’s Donald Jensen, adding: “We should not think that the war is anything close to being settled.”

Type: Podcast

Ukraine: The Inflection Point in the China-Russia Axis

Ukraine: The Inflection Point in the China-Russia Axis

Thursday, December 19, 2024

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has catalyzed a profound shift in global power dynamics: the deepening of the partnership between China and Russia. This relationship, while rooted in history, represents a significant departure from previous patterns of cooperation. China-Russia ties have evolved from a transactional relationship of convenience to a more durable strategic alignment, while continuing to fall short of a full-blown military alliance. This development challenges traditional Western assumptions about the limits of authoritarian cooperation and may signal the emergence of a new model of international partnership.

Type: Analysis

Protecting Water Infrastructure During War

Protecting Water Infrastructure During War

Friday, December 6, 2024

The weaponization of water resources is among the most devastating tools used in violent conflict. And while this tactic has been pervasive throughout history, it’s on the rise. State and non-state actors across the globe are increasingly exploiting the capture, control and outright destruction of water resources and related infrastructure to inflict indiscriminate human suffering and further their own strategic and military aims. To put this devastating trend into historical context: Out of all the recorded incidents targeting water infrastructure over the last 2,000 years, 41 percent have occurred since 2020.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis