Political parties in Afghanistan are often dismissed by international and Afghan observers as unruly and highly personalized organizations that contribute little to the democratic process. Yet they continue to play a part in shaping the political landscape, albeit in what might be considered unorthodox ways. This report assesses their history, role, and activities over the last decade and how their future might unfold under and contribute to the country’s new unity government.

Summary

  • Political parties in Afghanistan have no historical precedent of a legal, formalized role within the political system. Since 2001, however, they have been able to register officially as organizations.
  • Elections in Afghanistan, particularly those in 2014, have provided a stimulus for change within parties that has the potential to offer more than the simple collectivity of a common cause.
  • Changes in party behavior include greater outreach to urban educated Afghans through greater use of communications technologies, greater influence among young people generally, more parliamentarians aligning themselves openly with parties, consolidated voting blocs, more space for women, more and earlier preparation for elections, and greater engagement in national-level debate.
  • These changes, however, are opportunistic rather than strategic and do not look beyond 2015.
  • Institutionalization of the changes taking place within parties will depend on the availability of resources and the political will of party leadership but also critically the new administration’s approach and incentives created for parties’ consolidation as political actors.
  • A constitutional loya jirga apparently scheduled for some point before the end of 2016 may provide the necessary opportunity for parties to lobby for greater involvement in government.
  • For lobbying to prove successful, parties will need to ensure that their voice is heard, possibly by gaining influence in the lower house of parliament in the 2015 elections.

About the Report

This report assesses the contributions of political parties to, and their place within, the Afghan political landscape through transition and beyond and how they continue to navigate the limitations of their lack of formal political role. Part of broader United States Institute of Peace research on the 2014 Afghan elections, the report is based on more than fifty interviews conducted in 2014 with members of twelve political parties both before and after the presidential and provincial council elections.

About the Author

Anna Larson is a research associate at the Centre of Contemporary Central Asia and the Caucasus at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. She is coauthor with Noah Coburn of Derailing Democracy in Afghanistan.


Related Research & Analysis

Understanding the Implications of the Taliban’s Opium Ban in Afghanistan

Understanding the Implications of the Taliban’s Opium Ban in Afghanistan

Thursday, December 12, 2024

The Taliban’s opium ban, coupled with Afghan farmers’ replacement of poppy largely with low-value wheat, is likely to worsen dissatisfaction and political tensions. The Taliban’s persistence in enforcing the ban has been notable, especially in 2024. If the ban remains in place, it would demonstrate the regime’s strength but also worsen rural poverty, increase dissatisfaction among landholders and spur political instability. This will likely lead to increased humanitarian needs and more pressures for outmigration to nearby countries and beyond, both of which are of interest to the U.S. and other Western countries. Conversely, if the ban weakens in response to pressures and resistance, a revival of widespread poppy cultivation could undermine the regime’s authority. Aid alone will not offset the economic shock of the ban, nor stimulate the long-term growth needed to effectively combat the opium problem.

Type: Analysis

How Afghanistan’s Economy Can Survive Shrinking Shipments of U.N. Cash Aid

How Afghanistan’s Economy Can Survive Shrinking Shipments of U.N. Cash Aid

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Afghanistan’s precarious economy is facing a new set of multidimensional risks as humanitarian aid — delivered in massive shipments of U.S. cash dollars — shrinks rapidly amid competing demands from other crises around the world. The dollar inflows, moved under U.N. auspices, have helped stabilize the Afghan economy, cover its mammoth trade deficit, and inject monetary liquidity into commerce. With much smaller cash infusions, in line with a general reduction in aid, the suffering of Afghanistan’s poverty-stricken population is likely to increase.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis