North Korea on February 12 conducted a third nuclear test blast, drawing immediate global condemnation. USIP has several recent resources discussing the North's proliferation activities.

north-korea-flag.jpg

North Korea today (February 12) conducted its third nuclear test explosion, a long-anticipated move that prompted immediate global condemnation and runs afoul of United Nations Security Council resolutions. The test blast was the first during the rule of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, a son of the previous leader Kim Jong-il. Previous tests were conducted in 2006 and 2009, and the North said today that the new test produced "greater explosive force" and relied on a miniaturized nuclear device. Analysts are watching closely for signs that North Korea is making progress toward a lighter, smaller nuclear device that could be mounted on a long-range ballistic missile. In December, North Korea conducted what was seen as a successful ballistic rocket launch. That move also led to U.N. Security Council sanctions and condemnation.

The North is locked in a years-long diplomatic standoff with several other countries, including the United States, over its defiant nuclear program. Six-party nuclear talks that earlier considered the North's denuclearization in return for economic and diplomatic incentives are currently dormant.

President Barack Obama called the new test "highly provocative" and urged additional international sanctions. The U.N. Security Council is to meet on Tuesday in an emergency meeting to discuss the North Korean action.

Explore Further

USIP has several recent resources that examine North Korean weapons proliferation.

  • One looks at challenges to the global nuclear nonproliferation system on the website's "2013 sleeper risks" series.
  • A recent Olive Branch blog looks at North Korea's pattern of threats.
  • An "On the Issues" by Michael Lekson, an arms control expert and the director of gaming for USIP's Academy for International Conflict Management and Peacebuilding, examines the recent North Korean missile test and related issues.
  • And a new book on IAEA verification efforts.

 


Related Research & Analysis

The Current Situation in North Korea

The Current Situation in North Korea

Thursday, February 13, 2025

In 2018, reinvigorated diplomacy and reduced tensions generated hope for a more secure and peaceful Korean Peninsula. At a historic summit in Singapore in June, the United States and North Korea committed to establish “new U.S.-DPRK relations” while North Korea also committed to work toward the “complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.” However, the two countries disagreed about what each side should concede and when, leading to a diplomatic failure at a subsequent summit in Hanoi in February 2019. Today, the United States and North Korea coexist in an antagonistic, high-risk stalemate.

Type: Fact Sheet

The Risks of South Korea’s Nuclear Armament Under a Troubled Democracy

The Risks of South Korea’s Nuclear Armament Under a Troubled Democracy

Monday, February 10, 2025

On President Donald Trump’s first day in office, he referred to North Korea as a “nuclear power.” Just a few months before, North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un said he would “exponentially” increase his country’s nuclear weapons arsenal, which he followed by testing a new intercontinental ballistic missile and a new hypersonic missile. Additionally, there are concerns that Moscow may transfer sensitive military technologies to North Korea in exchange for Pyongyang supplying weaponry and troops for Russia’s war on Ukraine. These developments inject new urgency into a key question that will have major ramifications for stability and security on the Korean Peninsula and beyond: Should South Korea go nuclear?

Type: Analysis

To Build Peaceful Coexistence with North Korea, Focus on Ordinary North Koreans

To Build Peaceful Coexistence with North Korea, Focus on Ordinary North Koreans

Wednesday, January 29, 2025

For any peaceful coexistence between the United States and North Korea to take root, there will need to be multiple levels of dialogue, engagement and cooperation. Given the historic distrust between the two countries, this is easier said than done. But “people-focused” engagement — that is, engagement that centers North Korean people’s wellbeing — could allow Americans to establish working relationships with North Korean counterparts while also demonstrating U.S. commitment to improving the lives of ordinary North Koreans.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis