The U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) is continuing a series of courses organized by its Academy for International Conflict Management and Peacebuilding on the challenges of nuclear nonproliferation and arms control in the 21st century. The most recent course focused on Iran and Pakistan.

March 6, 2012

The U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) is continuing a series of courses organized by its Academy for International Conflict Management and Peacebuilding on the challenges of nuclear nonproliferation and arms control in the 21st century. The most recent course focused on Iran and Pakistan.

The series grows out of USIP’s role as the institutional convener of two key assessments of U.S. national security policy: the 2008-09 Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States and the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) Independent Panel. The Strategic Posture report, published by USIP, became the blueprint for the U.S. government’s 2010 Nuclear Posture Review.

“Nuclear issues cast long shadows that can affect, and even disrupt, relations with other countries, and they certainly have an impact on non-nuclear allies, such as Japan and South Korea,” said Bruce W. MacDonald, an instructor who is senior director of USIP’s Nonproliferation and Arms Control Program.

Added MacDonald, “Teaching and training are an important part of USIP’s raison d’etre.” MacDonald’s colleague and co-instructor at USIP, Michael Lekson, said the instructional topics “fit the broad rubric of conflict prevention”—a core part of USIP’s mission. Lekson, an arms control specialist who spent 26 years with the State Department, is the director of gaming for the Academy’s training programs.

The course series is USIP’s response to help address the emerging shortfall in expertise on arms control and nonproliferation issues. “The United States has lost a generation of government officials and NGO experts who focus on the issues related to managing the nuclear threat--including deterrence, nonproliferation and arms control,” said Paul D. Hughes, a retired U.S. Army colonel and now USIP’s chief of staff. Hughes also served as executive director for both the Strategic Posture effort and independent panel on the QDR. “This field is a very complex conflict-prevention issue, requiring leadership and expertise both in government and the non-government arenas,” he said.

An Institute course on February 29 and March 1 covered the landscape of issues related to Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal and Iran’s disputed—and intensely watched—nuclear program. “In this course, we’re helping people develop a better appreciation of proliferation issues, primarily through the lens of Pakistan and Iran,” said MacDonald, a former White House and State Department official who was educated as an aerospace engineer.

The recent Academy course featured a simulation involving a dramatic nuclear weapons breakout scenario with Iran. Students were placed in the roles of staffers at the U.S. National Security Council and required—within 30 minutes--to clarify primary U.S. concerns and make recommendations for U.S. diplomatic and military moves in response.

The Pakistan portion of the course included discussions led by USIP’s own Moeed Yusuf, the Institute’s South Asia adviser and a leading specialist on Pakistan, which is increasing its nuclear arsenal amid internal Islamist terrorism and continuing tensions with regional rival India. The Iran portion of the class included a lengthy presentation by David Albright, a nuclear proliferation expert and president of the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security.

The Academy’s series on arms control and nonproliferation commenced in September 2010. The next course will be held March 20-22, and concentrate on U.S. national security issues related to the nuclear programs of China and North Korea. “These courses are part of our overall Academy curriculum,” said Lekson. “The Iran exercise involved conflict analysis, and the East Asian simulation will help strengthen participants’ negotiating skills.”

The courses aim to give students from government agencies or Congress, as well as civil society leaders, the tools to better understand and assess nonproliferation issues generally.

“The need for rebuilding America's knowledge base in nuclear matters could not be greater than it is today, especially in light of tensions with Iran and the proliferation activities by other international actors,” said Hughes. “We still need leaders who understand the complexities of nuclear weapons, strategies, arms control and the supporting infrastructure--and USIP is perfectly positioned to help the nation with part of that training.”


Related Publications

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

When announcing the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in April 2021, President Joe Biden identified counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan as an enduring and critical US national security interest. This priority became even more pronounced after the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, the discovery of al-Qaeda’s leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul less than a year later, and the increasing threat of the Islamic State of Khorasan (ISIS-K) from Afghanistan. However, owing to the escalating pressures of strategic competition with China and Russia, counterterrorism has significantly dropped in importance in the policy agenda.

Type: Report

Violent Extremism

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Thursday, May 9, 2024

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant. Indeed, at the end of March, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of ISIS launched a devastating attack outside of Moscow, killing over 140 people.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyViolent Extremism

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

At midnight on the night of February 24-25, 2021, India and Pakistan reinstated a cease-fire that covered their security forces operating “along the Line of Control (LOC) and all other sectors” in Kashmir, the disputed territory that has been at the center of the India-Pakistan conflict since 1947. While the third anniversary of that agreement is a notable landmark in the history of India-Pakistan cease-fires, the 2021 cease-fire is fragile and needs bolstering to be maintained.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Days after Pakistan’s February 8 general election, the Election Commission of Pakistan released the official results confirming a major political upset. Contrary to what most political pundits and observers had predicted, independents aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) won the most seats at the national level, followed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). No party won an absolute majority needed to form a government on its own. The resultant uncertainty means the United States may have to contend with a government that is more focused on navigating internal politics and less so on addressing strategic challenges.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

View All Publications