Ambassador William Taylor shares his review of the relationship between Afghanistan and Pakistan in 2010 and provides a glimpse into what we can expect from these two countries in 2011.

c

Looking back at Afghanistan and Pakistan in 2010, what are the key issues that stand out from the year in terms of U.S. policy?

The two standouts in U.S. policy are the relationships with the two governments. The relationship with the government of President Karzai went through ups and downs: tensions after the disputed presidential election and other official corruption lingered; good feelings from a successful Karzai visit to Washington in the spring improved the mood; questions about the durability of U.S. support generated by Bob Woodward’s book didn’t help; uncertainty about the meaning of the July 2011 date detracted from the U.S. effort; and the emergence of 2014 as the new target date for full hand-off of security to Afghan forces reassured the Afghans and worried their enemies. The relationship with the Pakistani government was strained over continued Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) support for insurgents killing Afghans, Americans and Indians.

Back to Top

What should we be looking to in 2011?

In 2011 we should watch these same two relationships. If U.S.-Afghan relations are going well - more consistency from the Americans, less corruption from the Afghans - we could see real progress toward stability in Afghanistan. If Afghans, Pakistanis and insurgents all come to believe that U.S. and coalition forces will be pressing the enemy for four more years as NATO leaders promised this fall, the game could change. Afghans could swing to turn their own army and ISAF forces away from the Taliban; confidence in the ability of Afghan security forces to control their territory could grow; Pakistanis could gain confidence that the U.S. would not abandon them again - like we did in 1989 - and begin to reign in the terrorist groups they have been supporting as a hedge; and the Taliban could lose support, recruits and the will to fight. But, none of this is guaranteed - it could go badly as well. It will be an interesting year.

Back to Top

Explore


Related Publications

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Thursday, May 9, 2024

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant. Indeed, at the end of March, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of ISIS launched a devastating attack outside of Moscow, killing over 140 people.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyViolent Extremism

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

At midnight on the night of February 24-25, 2021, India and Pakistan reinstated a cease-fire that covered their security forces operating “along the Line of Control (LOC) and all other sectors” in Kashmir, the disputed territory that has been at the center of the India-Pakistan conflict since 1947. While the third anniversary of that agreement is a notable landmark in the history of India-Pakistan cease-fires, the 2021 cease-fire is fragile and needs bolstering to be maintained.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Days after Pakistan’s February 8 general election, the Election Commission of Pakistan released the official results confirming a major political upset. Contrary to what most political pundits and observers had predicted, independents aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) won the most seats at the national level, followed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). No party won an absolute majority needed to form a government on its own. The resultant uncertainty means the United States may have to contend with a government that is more focused on navigating internal politics and less so on addressing strategic challenges.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

Tamanna Salikuddin on Pakistan’s Elections

Tamanna Salikuddin on Pakistan’s Elections

Monday, February 12, 2024

Surprisingly, candidates aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan won the most seats in Pakistan’s elections. But while voters “have shown their faith in democracy,” the lack of a strong mandate for any specific leader or institution “doesn’t necessarily bode well for [Pakistan’s] stability,” says USIP’s Tamanna Salikuddin.

Type: Podcast

View All Publications