Through the successive regimes of Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Il, and Kim Jong Un, North Korea has maintained near-total control over the information that reaches its citizens. Now, as more and more North Koreans use networked devices such as smartphones, the regime is employing modern forms of censorship and surveillance to control information and curtail freedom of expression. This report argues that the United States and its allies need a new information strategy to end the social isolation of the North Korean people and improve their long-term welfare.

Visitors use computers at the Sci-Tech Complex, a repository for digital information located on Ssuk Island in Pyongyang. (Photo by Franck Robichon/ EPA/ Shutterstock)
Visitors use computers at the Sci-Tech Complex, a repository for digital information located on Ssuk Island in Pyongyang. (Photo by Franck Robichon/ EPA/ Shutterstock)

Summary

  • Since Kim Jong Un became its leader in 2011, North Korea has enacted an ambitious strategy to reestablish control of information flows into and within the country. The key to the strategy’s success is leveraging the government’s technological sophistication relative to that of citizens.
  • The most significant advances have been at the device level. The regime’s control over hardware and software has yielded perhaps the most complete national digital censorship and surveillance system in existence. The strategy seems well calibrated to complement the highly state-controlled economic marketization Pyongyang appears to be moving toward.
  • The single caveat to this strategy is that it allows citizens to connect with one another directly—beyond state control—and could lead to greater nonstate economic and social coordination.
  • Information operations could be an effective component of U.S. strategy, but current efforts remain inadequate. Factual outside information is not reaching enough of the North Korean population and current dissemination strategies are not keeping pace with technological change. An effective strategy will take into account the changing ways North Koreans receive information and consider what they might achieve with such information—such as establishing a shared sense of popular opinion or forming social or economic constituencies.
  • US policy needs to be grounded in theories of change that factor in the changing economic, technological, and social conditions on the ground and seek to leverage or catalyze those changes. It needs to counter the censorship and surveillance components of North Korean network devices to open communication channels and allow greater circulation of information within the country.

About the Report

Drawing on relevant literature, analysis of North Korean media and information control techniques, and interviews with refugees and defectors, this report argues that a new US information strategy is needed to alleviate the social isolation of the North Korean people and improve their long-term welfare. The report was supported by USIP’s Asia Center.

About the Author

Nat Kretchun is deputy director at the Open Technology Fund, a U.S. government–funded organization that supports global internet freedom technologies. Before that, he was associate director of InterMedia, where he was co-author of the reports A Quiet Opening: North Koreans in a Changing Media Environment and Compromising Connectivity: Information Dynamics between the State and Society in a Digitizing North Korea.


Related Publications

Increasing Information Access for the North Korean People

Increasing Information Access for the North Korean People

Monday, April 15, 2024

In recent years, North Korea has become more repressive, more impoverished and more allergic to the outside world. Already turning inward after the failure of diplomatic efforts in 2019, the North Korean government isolated itself further amid the global COVID-19 pandemic. North Korea has learned to operate, and Kim Jong Un has learned to rule, with greater levels of self-isolation than aggressive international sanctions regimes could ever hope to impose. Given North Korea’s current mode of rejecting even humanitarian assistance and its recent turn toward Russia, the chances for diplomatic breakthroughs with Pyongyang look like a wishful long-term hope at best.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

It’s Time to Resolve the Korean War

It’s Time to Resolve the Korean War

Monday, April 1, 2024

The greatest challenge to peaceful coexistence between North Korea and the United States is the technical state of war between the two countries. The United States and the Soviet Union may have been at ideological loggerheads, used proxies in regional conflicts and come close to direct superpower blows — but they were not in a state of war. Resolution of the Korean War should be set as a stated U.S. policy objective. This is a necessary Step Zero on the road to peaceful coexistence with North Korea today and could reduce the risk of deliberate or accidental conflict, nuclear or otherwise.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Three Conditions for Successful Engagement with North Korea

Three Conditions for Successful Engagement with North Korea

Monday, March 25, 2024

The September 13, 2023, meeting between Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un in Russia’s Amur Oblast marked a significant crippling of the decades-long U.S. pressure-based approach toward North Korea. The strategy of isolating and pressuring North Korea through United Nations Security Council resolutions to compel its nuclear disarmament in exchange for providing normalized relations, economic aid and sanctions relief may or may not ever have been a winning strategy, but now is no longer viable. The strategy required cooperation among the United States, South Korea, China and Russia, but this now seems a distant prospect.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Building Trust through Health Cooperation with North Korea

Building Trust through Health Cooperation with North Korea

Monday, March 18, 2024

The United States needs to address the existing trust deficit with North Korea if it wants to coexist peacefully with that country. Trust building through health cooperation may be the least contentious way politically and the most likely to succeed. However, engagement on health and humanitarian assistance with North Korea, like security negotiations, has been undermined by geopolitics.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

View All Publications