The eviction of ISIS from the northern Iraqi town of Hawija in a military operation that began today will signify more than the extremist group losing a major stronghold in the country. Its recapture, delayed first for other military campaigns and then because of tensions over the planned Sept. 25 independence referendum in the nearby Kurdistan region, will pose a key test of whether Iraq can move peacefully into a post-ISIS era.

Kurdish peshmerga soldiers at a front-line position along the eastern edge of territory still held by Islamic State militants, near the city of Hawija, Iraq, Aug. 27, 2017.
Kurdish peshmerga soldiers at a front-line position along the eastern edge of territory still held by Islamic State militants, near the city of Hawija, Iraq, Aug. 27, 2017. Photo Courtesy of The New York Times/Ivor Prickett

The Iraqi government and its U.S.-led coalition supporters made Mosul and its surrounding areas a higher priority for liberation. Mosul was judged to have a greater symbolic and strategic importance, as Iraq’s second-largest city and the closest major urban hub to Syria.

Yet Hawija, a Sunni Arab city south of Mosul and located in the ethnic, sectarian and religious cauldron of oil-rich Kirkuk province, has its own importance. After the toppling of Saddam Hussein in 2003, Hawija became a focal point for the Sunni resistance to the new Baghdad government and the American occupation. As Sunnis felt increasingly marginalized, the area became a breeding ground for al-Qaida in Iraq, which began calling itself the Islamic State of Iraq as early as 2006, years before the ISIS onslaught in 2014.

In April 2013, the Hawija region’s anger at the government exploded after a violent crackdown on Sunni protesters exercising what they considered civil disobedience  left as many as 200 civilians dead and at least 150 injured. Such incidents fueled the surge of ISIS in the area the following year. By June 2014, ISIS had seized Hawija and much of southern Kirkuk, often with help from disaffected local residents.

Retaking Hawija will revive questions about the standing, loyalties and integration of Sunnis in the region. Kirkuk is populated by Arabs, Kurds, Turkmen and Christians. The entire province is part of territories under dispute by Baghdad and the country’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan region.

Tensions around that ethnic mix and the future of Kirkuk province have been heightened by the Kurdish government’s plans to hold a non-binding referendum on independence next week, a vote the U.S and other countries are urging be postponed.

In addition to the territorial issues, there will be questions for Hawija of how to establish conditions that will allow Iraqis to return home who fled the ISIS onslaught—or those who fled the current operation for fear of the fighting or retaliation against Sunnis by the largely Shia military units.

Hawija has one advantage in recovering from the three-year ISIS occupation: it is one of several areas where tribal, community and government leaders have entered a local peace agreement for when the area is recaptured. Supported by USIP and its Iraqi partners, Sanad for Peacebuilding and the Network of Iraqi Facilitators, the agreement was signed by more than 100 tribal sheikhs, aims to enable the return of those displaced and help lay the foundation for longer term political, economic, security and social stability.

Read Part 2: Iraq Faces New Tests After Hawija Offensive

Related Publications

How Do Everyday Iraqis Perceive the Possibilities for Peace?

How Do Everyday Iraqis Perceive the Possibilities for Peace?

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

By: Lee Tucker

This March was the 17th anniversary of the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. In the following 17 years, Iraq has continued to be wracked by conflict and instability, from the insurgency to ISIS to today’s anti-government protest movement. Needless to say, policymakers and analysts have paid much attention to Iraq during the past two decades. Yet there remains a knowledge gap, with a lack of reliable data on how everyday Iraqis perceive the possibilities for peace and stability. Understanding how Iraqis view the possibilities for peace is critical to policymakers, peacebuilding practitioners, and donor agencies working to bring stability to communities that have long been held under the grip of violence.

Type: Blog

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Using Smart Power to Counter Iran in Iraq

Using Smart Power to Counter Iran in Iraq

Tuesday, April 28, 2020

By: Dr. Elie Abouaoun; Molly Gallagher

Beginning with the early January killing of Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani, the first months of 2020 have seen a spike in long-simmering tensions between the U.S. and Iran. Those tensions have largely played out within the borders of Iran’s western neighbor, Iraq, just as they have for much of the last 17 years. Still bearing the battle scars from years of war, few in the region want to see an escalation to more overt conflict. And after nearly two decades, the American public has clearly demonstrated its own fatigue with endless wars. The question remains, then, how can the U.S. achieve its objectives in regard to Iran and Iraq without military action?

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

COVID-19 and Conflict: Iraq

COVID-19 and Conflict: Iraq

Thursday, April 16, 2020

By: Sarhang Hamasaeed

USIP is closely following the effects of the novel coronavirus around the world and we’re particularly concerned about its effects in fragile states and conflict zones, which are especially vulnerable to the impacts of these kinds of outbreaks. This week, our Sarhang Hamasaeed at three of the major ways this crisis is affecting Iraq: its politics, its security, and its relationships with Iran and the United States.

Type: Blog

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Democracy & Governance; Global Health

View All Publications