The Iranian president arrived in Cairo today, the latest in a series of exchanges that suggest mending ties. An analysis on USIP’s Iran Primer website explains why the relationship still has its limits.

President Mohamed Morsi of Egypt before meeting with his counterpart from Iran, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in Cairo

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s arrival in Egypt today marked the first visit by an Iranian president since his country’s 1979 revolution. He was in Cairo to attend a two-day summit starting tomorrow of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. The president of predominantly Shiite Muslim Iran met today with Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, whose Muslim Brotherhood is a mainstream Sunni Islamist group. Ahmadinejad also met with a grand sheikh who is considered Egypt’s top scholar of Sunni Islam.

Morsi visited Iran shortly after taking office in June 2012 for a conference of the Non-Aligned Movement. Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi has been to Egypt three times during that period. The contacts indicate a mending of relations between the two countries that were broken off after Egypt’s decision to recognize Israel and sign the Camp David Accords.

But the exchanges aren’t likely to portend a new alliance between Egypt and Iran, according to Joshua Stacher, a fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, DC. Morsi illustrated that when he took the occasion of his August visit to Tehran to denunciate Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, an ally of Iran.

In an interview with USIP’s Garrett Nada for the Iran Primer website, Stacher outlines why there is still more that separates these two countries than brings them together. Stacher, who is on leave from his post as assistant professor of political science at Kent State University, is author of Adaptable Autocrats: Regime Power in Egypt & Syria.

What do you think the effects might be of the new ties between Egypt and Iran?

Viola Gienger is a senior writer at USIP.


Related Publications

USIP Explains: Community Dialogue in Northern Sinjar

USIP Explains: Community Dialogue in Northern Sinjar

Thursday, April 11, 2024

Ten years after ISIS’ genocide against them, the wounds of the Yazidi community in Iraq’s Sinjar district remain fresh as thousands remain displaced and even more await justice for the crimes perpetrated against them. Meanwhile, despite living in peaceful coexistence prior to ISIS’ campaign, the conflict planted seeds of division among Sinjar’s various tribes and communities — resulting in tensions that threatened to tear the district apart even after ISIS’ defeat.

Type: Blog

Mediation, Negotiation & DialoguePeace Processes

Report of the Expert Study Group on NATO and Indo-Pacific Partners

Report of the Expert Study Group on NATO and Indo-Pacific Partners

Monday, February 19, 2024

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and its four partner countries in the Indo-Pacific—Australia, Japan, the Republic of Korea (ROK), and New Zealand—have entered a period of increased engagement. This engagement is taking shape in the context of the war waged by the Russian Federation (Russia) against Ukraine, NATO’s growing awareness of the security challenges posed by the People’s Republic of China (China), and important structural changes in the international system, including the return of strategic competition between the United States and China and Russia. It is occurring not only in bilateral NATO-partner relations but also between NATO and these Indo-Pacific countries as a group.

Type: Report

Conflict Analysis & PreventionCivilian-Military RelationsGlobal PolicyMediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

Why Now? The Tortured History of Iran’s Hostage Seizures

Why Now? The Tortured History of Iran’s Hostage Seizures

Wednesday, September 20, 2023

In January 1981, I stood at the foot of the Air Algerie flight that flew 52 American diplomats to freedom after 444 days as hostages in Iran. Some of them were my friends. I still remember their gaunt appearances after being caged and cut off from the world for so long as they quietly disembarked. That original hostage crisis was a turning point in U.S. history in the 20th century — and has shaped angry American views of the Islamic republic ever since.

Type: Analysis

Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

70 Years After the Armistice, the Korean Peninsula Still Struggles for Peace

70 Years After the Armistice, the Korean Peninsula Still Struggles for Peace

Monday, September 11, 2023

On July 27, 1953, military commanders from the United States, North Korea and China signed an armistice agreement that ended the hostilities of the Korean War. The parties agreed to a “complete cessation of hostilities and of all acts of armed force until a final peaceful settlement is achieved.” They also recommended holding a “political conference” within three months for “the peaceful settlement of the Korean question.” After 70 years of truce, however, peace on the Korean Peninsula is still elusive.

Type: Analysis

Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

View All Publications