As Vice President Joe Biden visits Ukraine this week, former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor underscores that domestic corruption—in the economy and government—remains the key weakness in that country’s efforts to build long-term stability. Taylor, who is USIP’s executive vice president, returned recently from a trip to Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, right, and Vice President Joe Biden talk during a meeting in Kiev, Ukraine, Dec. 7, 2015. Biden assured Ukrainian leaders that Russian cooperation in Syria would not change America’s position, and also pressed them to do more to battle corruption.
Photo courtesy of NY Times/Mikhail Palinchak

On Dec. 10, USIP is co-hosting, with the U.S. Department of State, a discussion of the danger that corruption poses worldwide and possible ways to make progress against the scourge. The event, which is open to the public, features Ukraine as a case study, with a panel that includes Daria Kaleniuk, a co-founder and executive director of the Anticorruption Action Centre in Ukraine, and Ambassador William Brownfield, assistant secretary for the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs at the State Department. In an interview at USIP, Taylor says:

  • Ukraine’s civil society remains one of the country’s strengths. In the two years since the Euromaidan demonstrations that toppled President Viktor Yanukovych, that movement “has invigorated the politics [and] the demand for economic reform and political reform,” Taylor said.
  • More reforms are needed. “What’s not working yet is the implementation of the depth of reform that is necessary. Corruption in government and the economy remains entrenched and is holding back economic growth.
  • International sanctions on Russia are working.  “Economic sanctions have turned out to be the most effective tool that the West … has against this invasion” of Ukraine by Russia, he said. They “are having a real effect on the Russian economy … that is responsible for the relative backing-off of the Russians in Donbas.” While Russian-backed separatists in the Donbas region are not fully respecting the ceasefire agreement, their attacks and the deaths of Ukrainian troops “are way down.” A continuation of those sanctions may force Russian President Vladimir Putin to remove Russian forces that are supporting those separatists in Donbas, he said. The sanctions should be sustained until Russia withdraws from Crimea, which it declared annexed last year, or otherwise resolves the Crimea issue to Ukraine’s satisfaction, Taylor said
  • The United States and its partners have delivered too little support to Ukraine so far. Despite widespread support in the United States for Ukraine, “we have not provided the magnitude of economic support that the Ukrainians need,” Taylor said.
  • Vice President Biden’s visit “is another demonstration” of U.S. political support for Ukraine. “Vice President Biden, to his credit, has really put his back into support for Ukraine,” Taylor said.

Related Publications

Whither NATO at 75?

Whither NATO at 75?

Thursday, April 11, 2024

By: Ambassador William B. Taylor;  Mirna Galic

NATO marked its 75th anniversary last week at a celebration in Brussels. While Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has injected the alliance with new life and resolve, the 32-member collective security pact is also wrestling with its future in a world of growing great power competition. In 2022, NATO formally identified for the first time China as a challenge to its interests and collective security. As NATO continues to support Ukraine and look to future global challenges, it also has internal issues to address, ranging from individual member defense spending to the problems posed by the need for collective decision-making among 32 members.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

Angela Stent on the Terror Attack in Moscow

Angela Stent on the Terror Attack in Moscow

Monday, March 25, 2024

By: Angela Stent

While ISIS has claimed responsibility for the devastating terror attack in Moscow, Putin has baselessly tried to shift the blame to Ukraine, says USIP’s Angela Stent: “[Putin] wants to use this to increase repression at home … and also to pursue a more aggressive path in Ukraine.”

Type: Podcast

War and the Church in Ukraine

War and the Church in Ukraine

Thursday, March 14, 2024

By: Peter Mandaville, Ph.D.

Vladimir Putin’s war to reverse Ukraine’s independence includes religion. For centuries, the Russian Orthodox Church bolstered Moscow’s rule by wielding ecclesiastical authority over Ukrainian churches. Since early 2019, Ukraine has had a self-governing Orthodox Church of Ukraine. Russia’s invasion has sharpened tensions between it and the rival branch historically linked to Moscow. Any conciliation between them could shrink areas for conflict — and the Kremlin’s ability to stir chaos — in a postwar Ukraine. It would bolster Ukraine’s future stability and reinforce a decline in Russia’s historically massive influence across the Orthodox Christian world. But can Ukrainians make that happen?

Type: Analysis

Religion

Lauren Baillie on the ICC’s Latest Warrants for Russian War Crimes

Lauren Baillie on the ICC’s Latest Warrants for Russian War Crimes

Wednesday, March 13, 2024

By: Lauren Baillie

For the first time, the International Criminal Court has charged high-level Russian commanders with crimes against humanity — showing that Russia’s assault on civilians and civilian infrastructure in Ukraine is “not sporadic, it’s systematic, it’s purposeful, it’s part of a policy,” says USIP’s Lauren Baillie.

Type: Podcast

View All Publications