Ukraine must not remain a country of great but unrealized potential. The International Monetary Fund package and other foreign assistance are helping stabilize Ukraine’s economy, but only an attractive business climate can result in the level of investment that will truly transform the country for the long term.

The Pretrivka market in Kiev, Ukraine, May 6, 2015. As the rest of Europe tries desperately to shrug off low inflation, Ukraine has added rapidly rising prices — officially up 61 percent, and perhaps more — to its long list of problems during its civil war with Russian-backed rebels. (Brendan Hoffman/The New York Times)
Photo Courtesy of The New York Times/Brendan Hoffman

Ukraine has the makings of a prosperous and diversified economy. Even under the present difficult conditions, Ukraine’s agricultural exports are booming – and the potential for expansion is tremendous. With the right investment climate, Ukraine can become a major information technology hub. It can also become energy independent and perhaps an energy exporter. Favorable wage levels and a central geographic location make Ukraine a highly attractive location for manufactures of all types. The tourism, consumer products, transportation and financial sectors all have great promise.

But much work remains to be done. The World Bank put Ukraine at 83rd place among 189 countries surveyed in its Ease of Doing Business report for 2016. This is lower than Belarus (44) or even Kyrgyzstan (67).

Despite the EuroMaidan Revolution, Ukraine -- fairly or not -- is seen as about as corrupt as it was during the Viktor Yanukovych kleptocracy. Transparency International’s 2014 Corruption Perception Index put Ukraine at 142nd of 175 countries surveyed, compared with a 144 ranking in 2013.

Direct foreign investment has fallen since the Maidan events. Investors don’t like uncertainly and that is what the Russian annexation of Crimea and assault on Donbas have wrought. But investors also don’t like a business climate characterized by insider deals, bribes and selective justice. And much of that remains in place.

The U.S. State Department’s 2015 report on Ukraine’s investment climate observed that “in practice, the court system is viewed as ineffectual, corrupt and in dire need of reform.” The lack of a proper legal system in Ukraine is the major reason why the U.S. share of direct foreign investment in Ukraine was only 1.9 percent in 2014.

Judicial reform is thus essential -- now. This must include the vetting, requalifying and, as needed, firing of existing judges and prosecutors -- and the hiring of new people untainted by the corruption of the past. Salaries of those who remain must be significantly increased to ward off bribery.

A level playing field – founded on rule of law -- will allow investors to compete based on who has the best product or service, not on who has the best political connections needed to obtain government contracts or concessions. Many of Ukraine’s tycoons are not businessmen at all. Rather, they obtained their fortunes from insider deals arranged with political actors and use their wealth to perpetuate privileged access to the state budget. Their influence corrupts the political and economic system and must end.

Investment is a vote of confidence; that vote remains elusive today for Ukraine. By focusing on reforms that foster an attractive investment climate, Ukraine’s leaders can set the stage for an era of sustained growth. Actions not words are needed for Ukraine to reach the tipping point -- when investors let the funds flow.

William B. Taylor is executive vice president of the U.S. Institute of Peace and former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine. Colin Cleary is a fellow at the United States Institute of Peace and former political counselor at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. government. The Russian version was published by Novoye Vremya. Reposted with permission from Kyiv Post. This article was first published on Nov. 18, 2015.

Related Publications

Charles North on Russia in Ukraine

Charles North on Russia in Ukraine

Thursday, November 1, 2018

By: Charles North

“In its fifth year, Russia's armed aggression in Ukraine's Donbas region has become a costly burden with little strategic benefit,” says Charles North. One possible exit ramp has emerged from recent negotiations: a U.N.-mandated peacekeeping operation to facilitate a peace process resulting in Russia’s departure from Donbas and the return of control to Ukraine.

Global Policy

Ambassador Bill Taylor on Russia and NATO

Ambassador Bill Taylor on Russia and NATO

Thursday, July 5, 2018

By: William B. Taylor

Ahead of the highly anticipated Trump-Putin meeting and the NATO summit in Europe later this month, Ambassador Taylor discusses the key issues that will be on the agenda at both, including Russian meddling in U.S. elections and Moscow’s aggressive actions in Europe as well as NATO members’ progress as it relates to U.S. concerns over burden-sharing.

Global Policy

Can the Trump-Putin Summit Improve U.S.-Russian Relations?

Can the Trump-Putin Summit Improve U.S.-Russian Relations?

Thursday, June 28, 2018

By: William B. Taylor; USIP Staff

Following a meeting between U.S. National Security Advisor John Bolton and President Vladimir Putin this week, the White House announced that President Trump will sit down with his Russian counterpart for their first formal summit on July 16 in Helsinki, Finland. While both presidents Trump and Putin have repeatedly emphasized the need for improved ties, there are a host of contentious issues—such as the invasion of Ukraine and subsequent U.S. sanctions, Russia’s interference in U.S. and European elections, and the Syrian civil war—that could derail the effort to improve the bilateral relationship.

Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

View All Publications