President Donald Trump, in his recent press conference with visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, said he would support a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict “that both parties like.” The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations has since affirmed administration support for the two-state solution that long has been the stated goal of the U.S., the international community and the two sides. But the president said he’s “looking at two-state and one-state.” On March 7, the U.S. Institute of Peace hosted a discussion with analysts and former diplomats about the viability of the two-state model, and the possibility of alternatives for a sustainable peace.

President Trump expressed an early interest in making “the ultimate deal” between the Israelis and Palestinians, but it remains unclear how the administration plans to engage on this conflict. Polls of Israelis and Palestinians consistently suggest that while support is shrinking for the two-state solution, it remains the preferred outcome. So what are the alternatives, and how politically and logistically feasible are they?

The conversation included Dahlia Scheindlin, who recently proposed a confederal approach as a “Third Way for Israel-Palestine.”  She was joined by Khaled Elgindy, a former advisor on permanent status negotiations to the Ramallah-based Palestinian leadership, and by USIP’s Mike Yaffe, formerly the senior advisor to the special envoy for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations at the Department of State.

Speakers

Mr. Khaled Elgindy
Fellow, Center for Middle East Policy, Brookings Institution
 
Dr. Dahlia Scheindlin
Public Opinion Expert, Mitvim Institute
 
Dr. Mike Yaffe 
Vice President, Center for the Middle East and Africa, U.S. Institute of Peace
 
Mr. Keith Mines, Moderator
State Department Interagency Professional in Residence , U.S. Institute of Peace

Related Publications

Regime Offensive Aims to Retake Southwest Syria, Displaces Thousands

Regime Offensive Aims to Retake Southwest Syria, Displaces Thousands

Monday, July 2, 2018

By: Mona Yacoubian

Over the past two weeks, the Syrian government has embarked on a military offensive across Syria’s southwest, focused on retaking the city of Dara’a. Russia has played a critical role, backing the operations with airstrikes. The United Nations estimates that at least 160,000 Syrian civilians have been displaced by the fighting, and the number could increase as the battle intensifies.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Iran and Israel Are Racing Toward Confrontation in Syria

Iran and Israel Are Racing Toward Confrontation in Syria

Monday, May 21, 2018

By: USIP Staff; Mona Yacoubian

Ties between Tehran and Damascus have been close since the 1979 revolution, but the relationship deepened after Syria’s civil war erupted in 2011. With the Assad regime’s survival at stake, Tehran doubled down on its support, providing critical military assistance—fighters and strategists—and economic aid estimated to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Lucy Kurtzer-Ellenbogen on the Tumult Between Israelis and Palestinians

Lucy Kurtzer-Ellenbogen on the Tumult Between Israelis and Palestinians

Thursday, May 17, 2018

By: Lucy Kurtzer-Ellenbogen

A confluence of factors this week led to heightened tensions in Israel and the Palestinian territories. Israel celebrated its 70th anniversary, the United States officially moved its embassy to Jerusalem, and protests in Gaza led to levels of violence not seen in several years. Lucy Kurtzer-Ellenbogen shares her analysis and discusses the perfect storm of events leading to the tumult between Israelis and Palestinians and explains why Middle East peace remains a generational goal.

View All Publications