Scholars and policy analysts increasingly seem to agree that building effective and legitimate states lies at the core of successful peacebuilding. But is this true? Is a state-building approach the surest way to peace in places like Afghanistan, Iraq and Somalia? Some analysts think that state-building efforts risk aggravating violence or empowering unaccountable and corrupt regimes. Others believe that effective state institutions are the only hope for self-sustaining stability.

Please join us to for a discussion of the new state-building approach with contributors to a recently published book, Building States to Build Peace, edited by USIP Senior Fellow Charles Call. Panelists will discuss the tensions that may exist between state-building and peacebuilding, and the circumstances under which legitimate and sustainable states may be established in the aftermath of civil wars. They will also address what changes are needed for international actors to be more effective in their endeavors.

 

Archived Audio

To listen to audio or to view video, please click on the links provided below. You also can right click on the links and choose "Save Target As" or "Download Linked File." This will save the file to your computer and then allow you to play it in your media player directly. More Audio Help.

Speakers

  • Sarah Cliffe
    Director of Strategy and Operations for the East Asia and Pacific Region at the World Bank
  • Kenneth Menkhaus
    Expert on Somalia and Professor of Political Science, Davidson College
  • Charles T. Call
    Jennings Randolph Senior Fellow, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Karin von Hippel
    Co-Director, Post-Conflict Reconstruction Project, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)
  • Daniel P. Serwer, Moderator
    Vice-President, Center for Post-Conflict Peace and Stability Operations, U.S. Institute of Peace

Related Publications

The Latest @ USIP: Preventing Conflict Over Critical Minerals

The Latest @ USIP: Preventing Conflict Over Critical Minerals

Tuesday, April 23, 2024

Critical minerals underpin the world economy, powering everything from batteries and computers to the global energy transition. But, as a new USIP senior study group report reveals, competition over securing critical mineral supply lines can also upend stability and security in developing countries. Ambassador Dave Miller, president of the U.S. Diplomatic Studies Foundation, discusses how peace games offer U.S. and international policymakers a chance to practice strategies for preventing conflict — a skillset that will only become more valuable as demand for critical minerals increases.

Type: Blog

EnvironmentEconomics

How ‘Traumatic Decarbonization’ Can Impact Political Stability and Peace

How ‘Traumatic Decarbonization’ Can Impact Political Stability and Peace

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

The process of decarbonization — that is, the replacement of fossil fuels with non-hydrocarbon-based forms of energy — is essential for the world to meet its climate goals. But in many fragile oil-producing states, hydrocarbon revenues are not just central to national economies. They also bind together the political system through elite revenue-sharing pacts. The rapid, unplanned decarbonization of these countries would spark political crisis, a process known as “traumatic decarbonization.”

Type: Question and Answer

EnvironmentFragility & Resilience

Critical Minerals in Africa: Strengthening Security, Supporting Development, and Reducing Conflict amid Geopolitical Competition

Critical Minerals in Africa: Strengthening Security, Supporting Development, and Reducing Conflict amid Geopolitical Competition

Tuesday, April 9, 2024

The United States Institute of Peace convened a senior study group to explore the role Africa plays in the United States’ efforts to diversify US critical mineral supply chains and how new investment in partnerships with African countries could help drive economic development and strengthen peace and security on the African continent. Based on meetings and interviews with relevant technical, operational, and policy experts, the study group developed multiple recommendations for the United States to support mutually beneficial public and private partnerships with African nations.

Type: Report

EconomicsEnvironmentGlobal Policy

View All Publications