This year’s U.N. General Assembly came amid a host of interconnected global challenges, like the war in Ukraine, global food insecurity and climate change. Indeed, the theme of the General Assembly was to find “transformative solutions to interlocking challenges.” As the world’s premier multilateral body, the United Nations’ recognition of the interconnected nature of today’s vexing challenges is vital to building consensus and devising solutions. But regional multilateral bodies — like the African Union (AU) or the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) — also have a key role to play. Despite regional organizations’ shortcomings, their member countries are bound together by geography and similar challenges and therefore more likely to find more common ground than the 193 countries in the United Nations.

Leaders of Southeast Asian nations at the U.S-ASEAN special summit at the White House in Washington, May 12, 2022. Regional institutions like ASEAN are play a vital role in how states respond to conflict and crisis. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)
Leaders of Southeast Asian nations at the U.S-ASEAN special summit at the White House in Washington, May 12, 2022. Regional institutions like ASEAN are play a vital role in how states respond to conflict and crisis. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)

Amid intensifying strategic rivalry between the United States, Russia and China, regional actors can mobilize for more effective action to prevent or resolve violent conflict even when great powers are not aligned. Peacebuilding organizations — with their local, regional and, in some cases, global reach — are well positioned to partner with regional multilateral institutions in tackling regional and local problems. They have local networks and familiarity with the local contexts in which they work. In today’s complex, interdependent world, how can peacebuilding organizations work effectively with regional organizations to build peace and stability?

Regional Institutions Take on the Big Challenges

Regional multilateral institutions are instrumental in shaping the ways in which states respond to crises like climate change and violence. The response to the COVID pandemic serves as a particularly poignant example. In collaboration and coordination with the World Health Organization, ASEAN and the AU mobilized to create a cohesive plan and strategy to combat the virus. Similarly, the climate crisis — and its compounding effects on wide-ranging issues like migration and conflict — has been a key area where the buy-in of regional multilateral actors has been critical. As the 2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference hosted by Egypt approaches, it is worth noting that this year witnessed the conference’s first regional climate week for the Middle East and North Africa.

Partnerships between peacebuilding organizations and regional multilateral actors are relatively new to the field of peacebuilding, but there are examples that show why more research into their collaboration is needed. For example, the West Africa Network for Peacebuilding (WANEP) — a network of local civil society actors — connects local partners and organizations to the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in order to enhance its efforts to respond early to conflict and violence. Peacebuilding organizations like Fund for Peace and USIP engage with regional multilateral organizations directly or through the civil society networks they build and maintain with local actors.

Can Peacebuilding Organizations Help?

Still, there is limited knowledge of how peacebuilding organizations can enhance regional bodies’ efforts to promote stability and prevent conflict. As such, USIP has commissioned a study examining the ways in which peacebuilding organizations engage with multilateral organizations. In partnership with Fund for Peace, this project aims to further explore the role of regional organizations in peacebuilding and the entry points they afford peacebuilding actors. In mid-2023, this research will result in recommendations for how peacebuilding organizations could most effectively collaborate with regional multilateral institutions based on their respective strengths.

Some of the key questions that will guide this project include:

  • Do multilateral actors create openings for peacebuilding organizations and to what extent?
  • What are the most common types of engagement that peacebuilding actors adopt? In other words, in what way could WANEP’s entry point into ECOWAS offer a model to other regions in Africa or beyond?
  • Should peacebuilding organizations seek agreements that allow them to bring their expertise and well-developed methodologies to regional organizations?
  • What drives peacebuilding actors to seek engagement with regional multilateral organizations?
  • Does the level of engagement matter?
  • How and when can peacebuilding organizations leverage their local advantages when considering regional multilateral actors?
  • Where such regional engagement currently does not exist, can and should peacebuilding organizations invest “diplomatic” efforts to nurture those ties? 

Ultimately, this research project can only answer some of the questions outlined above. Nonetheless, USIP’s study seeks to further explore these important and critical areas for a better understanding of how peacebuilding organizations play a role in the multilateral system, and how they can collaborate with regional bodies to build a more peaceful world.

Ignatius Onyekwere is a conflict sensitivity advisor and senior consultant for Fund for Peace.

Emily Sample is a program director at Fund for Peace.

Related Publications

What a Transitional Government in Haiti will Require to Succeed

What a Transitional Government in Haiti will Require to Succeed

Thursday, March 28, 2024

By: Nicolás Devia-Valbuena;  Keith Mines

After weeks of consultations, and amidst a near total breakdown of law and order in Haiti, a Caribbean Community (CARICOM)-led effort to create a new transitional governing council may be nearing completion. The council’s establishment would allow for the entry of a multinational security force that would then be able to join with the Haitian National Police and restore order. Some have suggested the inclusion of “enablers” for the new security force — air support, drones, intelligence. But to gain the trust of the Haitian people, the new governing council will need its own popular “enablers,” a systematic way to include many more sectors of Haitian society that are currently ignored or deliberately excluded from governance.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Moscow Concert Hall Attack Will Have Far-Reaching Impact

Moscow Concert Hall Attack Will Have Far-Reaching Impact

Wednesday, March 27, 2024

By: Mary Glantz, Ph.D.;  Gavin Helf, Ph.D.;  Asfandyar Mir, Ph.D.;  Andrew Watkins

On Friday, terrorists attacked the Crocus City Hall outside Moscow leaving 140 people dead and 80 others critically wounded. Soon after, the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attack. The terrorist group, which is headquartered in Iraq and Syria, has several branches, including in South and Central Asia. Press reports suggest the U.S. government believes the Afghanistan-based affiliate of the Islamic State, ISIS-Khorasan (ISIS-K), was behind the attack. The Biden administration has publicly noted that it had warned the Russian government of the terrorism threat in early March in line with the procedure of “Duty to Warn.”

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

What Does the U.N. Cease-Fire Resolution Mean for the Israel-Gaza War?

What Does the U.N. Cease-Fire Resolution Mean for the Israel-Gaza War?

Tuesday, March 26, 2024

By: Robert Barron

On March 25, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) passed Resolution 2728, calling for an “immediate” cease-fire in Gaza. The motion’s passage came after weeks of back and forth and posturing among the UNSC’s permanent and rotating members. The exact phrasing of the resolution and its relevance to the situation on the ground, as well as bilateral and multilateral relations — particularly U.S.-Israel ties — have been the subject of heavy public and media attention since Monday, raising questions about the resolution’s subtext, intent and limitations. USIP’s Robert Barron looks at these questions.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyPeace Processes

What’s Driving India-China Tensions?

What’s Driving India-China Tensions?

Monday, March 25, 2024

By: Dean Cheng;  Sameer P. Lalwani, Ph.D.;  Daniel Markey, Ph.D.;  Nilanthi Samaranayake

Since deadly clashes between India and China on their 2,100-mile disputed border — known as the Line of Actual Control (LAC) — nearly four years ago, the two countries have remained in a standoff and amassed an increasing number of troops on either side of the LAC. While India and China have held regular exchanges at the corps commander level since 2020, each side has also continued to militarize and invest in infrastructure in the high-altitude border regions, which may exacerbate risks of clashes or escalation. India-China competition has also deepened beyond the land border, particularly in the Indian Ocean region.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications