The eviction of ISIS from the northern Iraqi town of Hawija in a military operation that began today will signify more than the extremist group losing a major stronghold in the country. Its recapture, delayed first for other military campaigns and then because of tensions over the planned Sept. 25 independence referendum in the nearby Kurdistan region, will pose a key test of whether Iraq can move peacefully into a post-ISIS era.

Kurdish peshmerga soldiers at a front-line position along the eastern edge of territory still held by Islamic State militants, near the city of Hawija, Iraq, Aug. 27, 2017.
Kurdish peshmerga soldiers at a front-line position along the eastern edge of territory still held by Islamic State militants, near the city of Hawija, Iraq, Aug. 27, 2017. Photo Courtesy of The New York Times/Ivor Prickett

The Iraqi government and its U.S.-led coalition supporters made Mosul and its surrounding areas a higher priority for liberation. Mosul was judged to have a greater symbolic and strategic importance, as Iraq’s second-largest city and the closest major urban hub to Syria.

Yet Hawija, a Sunni Arab city south of Mosul and located in the ethnic, sectarian and religious cauldron of oil-rich Kirkuk province, has its own importance. After the toppling of Saddam Hussein in 2003, Hawija became a focal point for the Sunni resistance to the new Baghdad government and the American occupation. As Sunnis felt increasingly marginalized, the area became a breeding ground for al-Qaida in Iraq, which began calling itself the Islamic State of Iraq as early as 2006, years before the ISIS onslaught in 2014.

In April 2013, the Hawija region’s anger at the government exploded after a violent crackdown on Sunni protesters exercising what they considered civil disobedience  left as many as 200 civilians dead and at least 150 injured. Such incidents fueled the surge of ISIS in the area the following year. By June 2014, ISIS had seized Hawija and much of southern Kirkuk, often with help from disaffected local residents.

Retaking Hawija will revive questions about the standing, loyalties and integration of Sunnis in the region. Kirkuk is populated by Arabs, Kurds, Turkmen and Christians. The entire province is part of territories under dispute by Baghdad and the country’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan region.

Tensions around that ethnic mix and the future of Kirkuk province have been heightened by the Kurdish government’s plans to hold a non-binding referendum on independence next week, a vote the U.S and other countries are urging be postponed.

In addition to the territorial issues, there will be questions for Hawija of how to establish conditions that will allow Iraqis to return home who fled the ISIS onslaught—or those who fled the current operation for fear of the fighting or retaliation against Sunnis by the largely Shia military units.

Hawija has one advantage in recovering from the three-year ISIS occupation: it is one of several areas where tribal, community and government leaders have entered a local peace agreement for when the area is recaptured. Supported by USIP and its Iraqi partners, Sanad for Peacebuilding and the Network of Iraqi Facilitators, the agreement was signed by more than 100 tribal sheikhs, aims to enable the return of those displaced and help lay the foundation for longer term political, economic, security and social stability.

Read Part 2: Iraq Faces New Tests After Hawija Offensive

Related Publications

Iraq’s Election Takes a Tone That’s Hopeful for Democracy

Iraq’s Election Takes a Tone That’s Hopeful for Democracy

Friday, May 11, 2018

By: Sarhang Hamasaeed; James Rupert

As Iraq prepares to vote on May 12, the public debate has been just a bit unusual. Following the country’s war against the Islamic State extremists, candidates are seeking votes with appeals across sectarian lines and more discussion of issues than in any other election campaign. This change is incremental but is one of several that make this a moment to step back and measure Iraq’s evolution since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion. Despite what Iraqis have suffered over 15 years—or perhaps because of it—the will to democratize is alive and growing. A real meaning of these elections is this: If the United States and the international community can sustain their engagement, Iraq has a chance to stabilize, and to turn back the inevitable future attempts to revive extremist violence.

Democracy & Governance

Kurdistan Region’s Debt Crisis Threatens Iraq’s Economy

Kurdistan Region’s Debt Crisis Threatens Iraq’s Economy

Wednesday, May 9, 2018

By: Andrew Snow

As Iraq’s parliamentary elections approach this weekend, destabilizing disputes with the Kurdistan Region remain unresolved. Perhaps the most intractable, and least discussed, is how to address the insolvency of the semi-autonomous Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). It’s a simmering crisis that threatens Iraq’s economic future and political unity, and one that the central government needs to step up and help defuse.

Economics & Environment

As Iraq Prepares for Elections, Iran's Influence Looms Large

As Iraq Prepares for Elections, Iran's Influence Looms Large

Monday, May 7, 2018

By: Sarhang Hamasaeed; Dr. Elie Abouaoun; Garrett Nada

Tehran’s interventions in conflicts throughout the Middle East have become a particular point of contention for detractors of the Iran Deal, which placed constraints on the country's nuclear program without addressing its role in Syria, Yemen, and across the region. There is no place Iranian influence has played a more conspicuous role than in neighboring Iraq.

Democracy & Governance; Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications