The United States needs to combine firm backing for democratic progress and human rights in Burma with a rigorous understanding of the country’s many divisions, to help ensure its development stays on track, says Derek Mitchell, a former U.S. ambassador there and now a senior advisor at USIP. He spoke in a videotaped conversation with USIP President Nancy Lindborg. They were wrapping up a week-long visit that included a meeting with now-State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi, whose party took power in March 2016 after 50 years of military rule.

Mitchell served from 2012 to 2016 as the first U.S. ambassador to Burma since diplomatic relations were downgraded in 1990. On this visit, he and Lindborg met with dozens of representatives from government, the military, civil society organizations, religious institutions and ethnic groups, and examined USIP programs in the country. They saw signs of progress: Mitchell cites citizens demanding freedom of the press; Lindborg notes that monks talked of using Facebook for rapid response to inflammatory rumors.

But Burma’s array of ethnic armed conflicts and communal tensions and its tradition of military rule complicate any endeavor at development.

The international community has “defined this country as a democratic challenge, for good reason,” Mitchell says. “But I don’t think many people understand that the defining challenge of this country is a unifying identity—in essence, ending the civil war, and building mutual respect.”

USIP is hosting a daylong conference on Burma on March 16.

Lindborg and Mitchell discuss the pace of Burma’s democratic change, the challenge of working toward peace among armed ethnic groups and the conflict between Buddhists in the country’s majority and the minority Muslim Rohingya in Rakhine State.

Related Publications

South Sudan’s Pitfalls of Power Sharing

South Sudan’s Pitfalls of Power Sharing

Friday, February 16, 2018

By: USIP Staff; Susan Stigant; Aly Verjee

This week, a new proposal for a power sharing government was tabled at the ongoing Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) High Level Revitalization Forum (HLRF) peace talks for South Sudan. An earlier, 2015 peace deal also contained a formula for power sharing; that arrangement failed and the civil war re-ignited a year later. Power sharing arrangements are appropriate if certain conditions are met, but not enough has been done to ensure the latest proposal will overcome the obstacles present in South Sudan, according to Susan Stigant, USIP’s director for Africa programs and Aly Verjee, a visiting expert at USIP and a former senior advisor to the IGAD mediation, who comment on the proposal and suggest how it could be improved.

Democracy & Governance; Fragility and Resilience; Global Policy

Understanding China’s Response to the Rakhine Crisis

Understanding China’s Response to the Rakhine Crisis

Thursday, February 8, 2018

By: Adrienne Joy

Following attacks on police posts by an armed Rohingya militia in August 2017, reprisals by the Burmese government have precipitated a humanitarian crisis. More than six hundred thousand Rohingya have fled to Bangladesh, where they face an uncertain future. Publicly stating that the root cause of conflict in Rakhine is...

Global Policy

Reframing the Crisis in Myanmar’s Rakhine State

Reframing the Crisis in Myanmar’s Rakhine State

Monday, January 22, 2018

By: Gabrielle Aron

In the aftermath of attacks by the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army and subsequent military clearance operations, two competing narratives have emerged. One frames the attacks as a critical threat to national security and the majority cultural-religious status quo. The second focuses on the human cost...

Global Policy; Human Rights

View All Publications